- posted
10 years ago
3D printing as alternative to traditional metalworking
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Now we're gettin somewhere as far as being practical for creating pieces of hardware. I'm no CNC/NC control or software writing geek, but with all aspects being open source, actual introduction to 3D printing probably won't get much easier than this approach.
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
You still need to know mechanical engineering principles to design parts that bear a load.
Since I built prototypes I tend to look at everything through the filter of 'how would I make one?', and for most moving and stationary machine parts the answer is that they need the precision of machine tools for hole alignment, parallelism and surface finish, unless they are toys (or demos) not expected to last. Only the outer packaging shape really lends itself to less precise 3D forming.
And if the part has to be clamped for drilling it's easier to start with parallel-sided stock than to support, clamp and locate an irregular shape.
At Segway I saw stressed moving parts successfully made by 3D printing but I don't think that was the best choice, just the quickest and easiest.
I don't like injection-molded plastic shafts and bearings either. I've replaced them on my extension-arm lamps with metal pins. jsw
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
"Wild_Bill" on Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:40:00
-0500 typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
For prototyping yes. But there are still some areas of production where "additive manufacturing" is going to have results less optimal than "traditional subtractive manufacturing."
-- pyotr filipivich "With Age comes Wisdom. Although more often, Age travels alone."
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
===============
More info on metal 3D printer
Has a bunch of links
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
I seen this thing where they make a small model, then they spray liquid steel at it, it hardenes in less than a millisecond. It grows to any size in seconds. then they heat it up and the core melts away.
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
You're correct Jim, and creating the files for parts, or learning how to, isn't something that I'd want to be doing. A CMM machine or laser scanner would be handy for others like myself, who don't have the capabilities to create files.. not practial for a home shop though.
For myself.. a sketch, measurements and conventional metalworking machines would be more practial.
Having a shop filled with metalworking machines makes the metal 3D machine less useful, but I'm fairly certain that building it would be enjoyable, and having it available would likely lead to more possibilities for using it.
The writer of one article George offered, used a brake drum as a hypothetical use.. which seems to be a poor example to me
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
Me too. But that has a learning curve and requires space and investment.
It seems to me that the 3D printer makers are trying to stir up a market among non-machinist hobbyists and crafters. I've acquired a wide range of fabrication skills from glassblowing through circuit board design and don't see many places where 3D printing is superior to the traditional methods of producing non-geometric shapes like sand or lost-wax casting. I wouldn't trust a home-made 3D hydraulic valve body or a high-speed pump impeller without a LOT of testing. jsw
- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
It's new technology,it will mature fairly rapidly.There was a time not too long ago that "traditional" methods of making moulds,ie hand made patterns and hydraulic pantographs was considered better than CAD/CNC. At that time both cad and cnc were slow,expensive and troublesome. The tech matured very quickly,and I doubt there are many people that can remember that method,or are even willing to brush up on the old skills.
3D printing is still very new and is evolving rapidly,it will be a long tim e it ever before it replaces all machining as we know it,but I think many o f the things we do now will be replaced by printing relatively soon. I'm just waiting of a Star Trek Replicator,still takes too long in the morn ing for my Earl Grey.- Vote on answer
- posted
10 years ago
software to create g code from stl files is in the public domain. download one at
many existing cad/cam programs can create/export .stl files.
POV-ray (excellent tutorials here), FreeCAD, HeeksCAD, and Art of Illusion also have serious fans in the 3D printing world, too, but we haven't done much experimenting with them yet.