Subject
- Posted on
March 17, 2010, 11:20 pm
Given a plant's transfer function, G_o(s), how would one be able to
choose the choice of a controller using Q-design method, where Q(s) =
F_(s)*G_o^(s), where G_o^(s) is the inverted signal of the
plant? More specifically, how would one justify whether to use first,
second, or third-order model for F_(s)? Thanks in advance
Re: Choice of F_Q transfer function in Q-design controller
ssylee wrote:
Practically or academically? (Where have I used that before?)
I'm not sure what you mean by the order of the model, but I assume that
you're constraining the behavior of your F_(s) to keep the plant
drive within bounds -- so do some analysis on the plant transfer
function, or try things out in simulation, and see what works best. You
want the simplest system that will still attain your goals.
--
Tim Wescott
Control system and signal processing consulting
www.wescottdesign.com
Re: Choice of F_Q transfer function in Q-design controller
It isn't clear what you are really trying to do? One could do many
things. if the controller is 1/G_o(s) then F(s) could be a low
pass filter to reduce output noise. Why not simply make F((s) a
constant to increase the gain and get the closed loop control closer
to unity?
You need to give a precise example as the question is vague.
Why bother with Q design in the first place is a better question?
Peter Nachtwey
Site Timeline
- » Choice of designing a feedforward controller
- — Next thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » COMP.DSP 2010 conference update
- — Previous thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Measurement validation for process signals
- — Newest thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » CNC routing plastics - eye irritant?
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-

- » Zero On topic out of 11
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-





