December 10, 2006, 3:12 pm
A fairly common stumbling block for those new to controller tuning relates
to step 2 of the controller design and tuning recipe. Step 2 says to
"collect controller output (CO) to process variable (PV) dynamic process
data around the design level of operation." But suppose disturbance
rejection is our primary control objective? Shouldn't we then step or pulse
(or "bump") our disturbance variable to generate the dynamic process test
data we require? The short answer is, no. Tuning a feedback controller
based on the disturbance to measured process variable dynamic relationship
is a certain path to failure...
Read the rest of the article at:
http://www.controlguru.com/2006/p121006.html
Site Timeline
- » Integration methode
- — Next thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » cascade control
- — Previous thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Measurement validation for process signals
- — Newest thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » CNC routing plastics - eye irritant?
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-

- » Zero On topic out of 11
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-


