December 21, 2006, 12:39 pm
In previous posts we explored disturbance rejection in the gravity drained
tanks process using P-Only and then PI control. In the PI study, we
confirmed the observations we had made in the PI control of the heat
exchanger investigation.
In particular, we learned that PI controllers can eliminate the offset
associated with P-Only control, have integral action that increases the
tendency for the PV to roll (or oscillate), have two tuning parameters that
interact, making it challenging to correct tuning when performance is not
acceptable. Here we investigate the benefits and challenges of derivative
action and PID control when disturbance rejection remains our control
objective...
To read the complete article, please visit:
http://www.controlguru.com/2006/p122006.html
All articles in the free e-book "Proven Methods and Best Practices
for Automatic Process Control" are available as links from:
http://www.controlguru.com/pages/table.html
Best wishes in this holiday season,
Doug Cooper
Site Timeline
- » Problem installing AB RSLogix500 V6.10.10
- — Next thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Call for Papers: The 2007 International Conference of Computational Intelligence and Intel...
- — Previous thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Measurement validation for process signals
- — Newest thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » What is it? Set 442
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-


