Subject
- Posted on
PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
- 08-07-2006
Hi all,
I am not new to PLCs, but I am not all that experienced either, so I
am looking for some "newbee" advice. Pointing me to some online
reference material would be greatly appreicated. My specific Questions
are:
- What are the major differenced between ContolLogix and SLC 500?
- Why would I want to select ControlLogix over SLC 500 or vise versa?
- Is there a FAQ about this material somewhere. I have not been able
to find one.
I am reading through the AB info at their web site, but I would also
like to know what experienced users have to say.
Thanks in Advance,
mze
Re: PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
St,
In percentage terms, how much more would a similarly sized
ControlLogix system cost compared to a SLC/500 system? I know there
are lots of options in both families, but all I am looking for is a
ball park figure on simulary sized systems that you may have worked
with. Thanks.
Mze
St wrote:
Re: PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
I don't know what it's like where you are, but over here (down under),
CLogix is roughly 1.5-2 times more than a similar-sized SLC depending on I/O
count and type - including software.
Actually just last week we ripped out an SLC and replaced it with a CLogix
doing the same job - although they're a good platform when left alone, the
SLC was comparatively just too much of a pain in the butt..
Cameron:-)
Re: PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
I/O
Why was the SLC a pain in hte butt? I've done similar jobs and mostly it was
just because the customer wanted A-B's latest and greatest. I've also done
other jobs where I simply upgraded a 5/02 (DH485) or a 5/04 (DH+) to a 5/05
(Ethernet) just so the customer could resolve connectivity issues. Processor
upgrades are nice because it requires no I/O rewiring. In and out during
those jobs :)
Re: PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
The client is using CitectSCADA thru the RS232 port - so you need a PIC to
communicate. I just don't happen to have one lying around... and that's a
pain in the butt.
5/05
Very true.. In this case:
1) the client was putting in a CLogix elsewhere on their plant,
2) the SLC had already grown to an extra rack in a box on top of the PLC
cabinet that was hard to get to (no room anywhere else) - the CLogix chassis
is more compact, did you notice that?,
3) replacing the CLogix meant they didn't have to carry SLC spares as well
as maintain RSLogix500 *and* 5000 and
4) I didn't think about it (and neither did the AB sales guy ;-).
Cameron:-)
Re: PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
Well .. fortunenaly or unfortunenaly it was never passed by me what the
costing on systems were. All I have had to do is spec out what. Or had it
specd' for me and had to work with them. I'll say that servo control is a
bit easier with the contrologix than with the SLC's
Most of the AB suppliers would be glad to price out systems..
st
Re: PLCs - SLC 500 and ControlLogix
I would like to thank all of you for the post you made in this thread.
I have heard that Clogix is about 40-100% more than a silimilar SLC
500. It is nice to know that the newer technology makes life easier
when implenting servos. I will assume that this is also the case with
process control systems. Again, thanks for all the input.
MZE
St wrote:
Site Timeline
- » Operating graphic standards or guidelines
- — Next thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Communication for new device?
- — Previous thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Measurement validation for process signals
- — Newest thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » What is it? Set 442
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-








