April 22, 2008, 8:26 pm
I am looking for a device for cold junction compensation that is lower
in cost than Omega's LXCJ-(*). See
http://www.omega.com/ppt/pptsc.asp?ref=LXCJ&Nav=temk03
Any recommendations? The device will be use with only one or two TC
channels and needs plus and minus one degree Centigrade accuracy. . A
device that produces an output voltage proportional to the temperature
of the cold junction is acceptable . It will be used with a data
acquisition system that can be used to add or subtract a millivolt
signal from the TC's signal. Would prefer something under US
$50.00.
Howard
Re: Thermocouple cold junction compensation.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
It's been too long, but I recall something about wiring the
hot thermocouple to a second thermocouple (backwards) and
then measuring the resultant voltage.
I'd prefer the voltage divider and diode..
Michael
Re: Thermocouple cold junction compensation.
Herman Family wrote:
Yes, but there's more.
I do too for private use. The time to design and calibrate isn't
warranted at a professional hourly rate.
The most accurate reading is had by immersing the auxiliary (reverse
connected) thermocouple's junction in as ice bath. Short of that, one
uses a temperature-dependent voltage that imitates the cold junction
over the ambient temperature range. The cited synthetic cold junction
from Omega is one such.
Jerry
--
Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get.
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
Re: Thermocouple cold junction compensation.
¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF
¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF¯AF
Thank you for your reply. So far I conclude the lowest cost solution
is to use an Analog Device temperature sensor to measure the
temperature of the cold junction. The phrase reverse connected
thermocouple is one I have never heard before. What exactly does that
mean?
Howard
Re: Thermocouple cold junction compensation.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 01:11:40 +0000, Herman Family wrote:
f9df8ab5ba01@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
That only works if the second thermocouple is at a known temperature.
Thermocouples only measure the temperature _difference_ between your
local (cold) junction and the remote (hot) junction. To find the actual
temperature of the hot junction you need to know the temperature of the
cold junction.
Putting another thermocouple at the cold junction will only work if it's
at a known temperature.
--
Tim Wescott
Control systems and communications consulting
http://www.wescottdesign.com
Need to learn how to apply control theory in your embedded system?
"Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" by Tim Wescott
Elsevier/Newnes, http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html
Re: Thermocouple cold junction compensation.
Thermocouples can really be a PITA. Keep in mind that every connection you
make is a potential thermocouple. In precision circuits, every relevent
juction is accounted for, down to the materials used for the male and
female connectors used for the thermocouple, and even the solder.
--
Scott
Reverse name to reply
Re: Thermocouple cold junction compensation.
Many years ago when electronic circuits were almost totally analogue, I
worked for a chart recorder manufacturer, there we used BC107
transistors mounted on the signal terminal block for CJC but I have no
idea of the circuit arrangment
Steve
hrh1818 wrote:
Site Timeline
- » Network DMCS UDC 3300 and Network HPM IOP SID with UDC6300
- — Next thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Forum on Controls
- — Previous thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » Measurement validation for process signals
- — Newest thread in » Industrial Control Group
-

- » A new attraction : "Velo-rail"
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » Model railroading in the UK
-

- » DRMM 2012: Kein 35Mhz-B-Band
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » RC and scale modeling (German)
-


Subject






