Constant torque clutch - redux

I've been fussing over this constant-torque clutch solution for my fuse spinning machine for a few weeks.

The sprag clutch on the takeup reel solved a lot of problems -- primarily, it removed the "letoff" that was occurring when the mechanical friction clutch slipped.

However, it still didn't solve the problem of the clutch sticking and slipping, thus varying tension on the roving as it passed through the machine. It was a minor thing, but resulted in cosmetic problems where the final over-wrap on the fuse was not uniform.

Mag-fluid clutches were too expensive, and multi-plate clutches still had the stiction problem. I even enquired of one multi-plate outfit that claimed "static friction is less than dynamic friction", which not only defies the rules of physics, but when they were challenged to produce torque curves, the could (would) not.

So, what to do? Hydraulics. Constant pressure on a pump (disregarding bypass losses) equals constant torque.

So I bought a re-furbished power steering pump, and set to making it into a constant pressure pump -- thus constant torque.

I modified the pump by locking the internal relief valve. It could have been made to relieve at the correct pressure, but had two drawbacks -- it had a large throw, and caused oil to recirculate IN the pump, rather than drawing from the reservoir during bypass. I also modified the pump by adding a port to the top of the relief valve chamber to add my own custom poppet-style relief valve.

This was a bit tricky, not for the easy machining of the cast iron, but for keeping chips out of the work. To do that, I filled the chamber with beeswax, draped a cloth over the entire pump, with a hole through which to do the boring and tapping, then surrounded the work area with lots of little rare-earth magnets. That worked. Kept ever trace of swarf out of the body of the pump.

I didn't know the displacement of the pump, and couldn't find it in any specs, so the selection of the relief valve spring had to be empirical.

I finally got the thing producing a smooth, jitter-free torque of 15 ft.lb. by cutting a miniature die spring down 1/2 coil at a time until the torque fit the spec.

Now the only things left to do are to build a driving boss for the pump housing, and a takeoff coupling for the shaft -- and we'll see how it works on the fuse machine.

It's been a three week "off-the-clock" learning exercise for me, but worth the time. I can see all sorts of uses for such a mechanism. The torque varies only about 15% from 2rpm to 7rpm, and that's well within my needs.

LLoyd

Reply to
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh
Loading thread data ...

--I hope you're taking lotsa photos; this is fascinating!

Reply to
steamer

steamer fired this volley in news:4c4f1586$0$1673 $ snipped-for-privacy@news.sonic.net:

Just a few, but it's pretty self-explanatory.

When it's all done (and works as planned ) I'll document it.

LLoyd

Reply to
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh

I'm sure I missed something, but why wouldn't a DC ( Permanent Magnet ) motor driven by a current source be a lot simpler?

Reply to
Cross-Slide

I wonder, could you have employed a viscous fan drive for automotive applications? The silicon fluid is moderated by a valve that is either actuated by a bimetal snap disk, a bimetal temperature sensing coil, or some electronics depending on the design.

With the bi-metal coil operated device, you can set your amount of drag by rotating the valve the coil is attached to, it is often adjustable.

Wes

-- "Additionally as a security officer, I carry a gun to protect government officials but my life isn't worth protecting at home in their eyes." Dick Anthony Heller

Reply to
Wes

Cross-Slide fired this volley in news:128b7a25- snipped-for-privacy@p11g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

It certainly would have been. I would loved to have built a current- varied takeup with a dancer arm to regulate.

But it wouldn't fit in the (existing) machine without big-time mechanical changes to both the drive train and the chassis.

This is an in-service machine that can't have major structural modifications without taking it out of service for a considerable (and unacceptable) time.

LLoyd

Reply to
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh

Still don't want to try the dancer arm - band brake mechanical tension control I suggested?

Reply to
Pete C.

Wes fired this volley in news:jPI3o.732771$ snipped-for-privacy@en-nntp-04.dc.easynews.com:

That's an excellent guess, because I tried that first. I don't know if it was the clutches I was testing, but I suspect it is the design, which has a fairly small surface area of interleaving grooves and channels -- but the maximum torque I could get out of one at 2rpm was about .5 ft.lb. At 2K rpm, they produce a lot more.

I even scavanged a used one, and filled it full of 1000Cps oil in an attempt to nullify the effect of the thermostatic relief valve. Same deal. Even with all the channels full of oil all the time, it wouldn't produce useful torque at low speeds.

LLoyd

Reply to
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh

Wes fired this volley in news:jPI3o.732771$ snipped-for-privacy@en-nntp-04.dc.easynews.com:

Oh.. forgot to mention, the effect of a fluid shear clutch is not linear at all speeds. The torque increases almost linearly with speed up to the shear stripping force of the oil, then flattens.

I need constant torque at _super_low_ rpms. (got it, too! )

LLoyd

Reply to
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh

"Pete C." fired this volley in news:4c4f5ea6$0 $11181$ snipped-for-privacy@unlimited.usenetmonster.com:

Pete, that would be fine, but there simply is not any room for the dancer. I've got about 5" from the winding shuttle to the spool. I can build such a brake easily, but I cannot (personally) see how to fit it into the existing structure without a lot of chassis and drive-train changes. If I were to "remote" the dancer to some other part of the chassis, it would complicate things in other undesirable ways.

The problem isn't "can it be done?", it's "can it be done without taking the machine out of service?" (except overnight).

I wasn't in love with having to "invent". I looked for a long time for a solution off-the-shelf that would fit the budget. 'Just couldn't find it.

The basic nature of this problem is an old one -- fit an "improvement" into the same space occupied by the old, unacceptable mechanism. As an example, the "Ingenious Mechanisms" book set is full of 'em.

LLoyd

Reply to
Lloyd E. Sponenburgh

Large truck models have even more torque. Some use 23,000cps fluid (bitch to pump). We test those things with 30+ inch fans and 75 hp drive motors in our test cells.

Wes

Reply to
Wes

Perhaps you can post a picture of the relevant portion of the machine in the metalworking dropbox so all the brilliant minds here can better see what might work?

Reply to
Pete C.

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.