Federal heavy vehicle use tax (heavy haul tax) form 2290

The semi truck that I own, with the trailer, is now semi-operational. The only thing that does not work, yet, is the hydraulic beavertail on the trailer.

We are now using it You can see the truck with trailer on this picture:

formatting link
Anyway, my question is about the federal heavy haul tax, form 2290:

Form:

formatting link
formatting link
The law is that owners of heavy vehicles must pay heavy haul tax. In my case, with a "V" plate, it would be $500 per year.

However, there is a provision that if the truck is expected to be used less than 5,000 miles per year, then it can be claimed as "suspended", and I would not owe tax. This comes to using it less than

100 miles per week. As of now, I expect that we will in fact be using it less than 100 miles a week.

Am I correct in my reading that I can claim it as suspended and submit the return, but not pay tax? And if, say, I end up using it more than

5,000 miles per year, I can then pay tax? Anyone knows this well enough?

thanks

i
Reply to
Ignoramus11296
Loading thread data ...

On 9/23/2012 3:58 PM, Ignoramus11296 wrote: ...

...

I believe that is so, Igg, but post the question to misc.taxes.moderated

-- there are several pros over there who will research/cite before posting if don't know otoh...

--

Reply to
dpb

On 9/23/2012 4:58 PM, Ignoramus11296 wrote: > ... > We are now using it > You can see the truck with trailer on this picture: >

Wow - you are dealing in some serious shit! Is "machinerymoverschicago" a new business of yours? Bob

Reply to
Bob Engelhardt

You can deal with it either way. Pay the "tax" first then claim a refund if you don't hit 5K a year. Or file for suspension and pay if you go over.

BUT either way you had better have VERY good documentation. Vehicle logs, driver logs, fuel reciepts and such to be able to prove the number.

Reply to
Steve W.

Is that green thing the larger size Mr. Fusion?

Reply to
David Lesher

Caught my eye too!

Gunner

-- "Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because Liberals are so stupid it is easy work." Steven M. Barry

Reply to
Gunner

...

He's got to keep that anyway for the highway boys and he'll want it for tax porpoises as well...

Reply to
dpb

True, But you know how Uncle Sam is about paperwork... Especially a hauler who claims to be running under 5K a year with a heavy rig.

Reply to
Steve W.

Good idea. I think that what I will do is, I will pay the tax now, document my mileage, and then file for a refund if I am under 5k miles after a year.

i
Reply to
Ignoramus11519

I sure would like one of those little ones, wouldn't you? Garbage in, LIGHT SPEED (or time travel) out. How could it get any better?

-- Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself. -- Thomas Jefferson

Reply to
Larry Jaques

You'll be marooned on the Planet of Obsessive Recyclers.

Reply to
Jim Wilkins

A great way to dispose of all the junk mail from the DNC.

Reply to
Michael A. Terrell

That's some heavy shit...

Reply to
Richard

Where I stole the marjareen...

-- Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself. -- Thomas Jefferson

Reply to
Larry Jaques

Umm, Iggy? You did hear that part about 80,000# max with a standard rig, right? I have a feeling you drive that over a scale the way it's loaded in the picture, and it's gonna light up TILT by a good 5K to

10K.

And you start peeling Benjamins off that wad in your pocket and handing them to the nice Illinois Highway Patrol Ossifer till he develops a case of transient amnesia.

Or you let him write the ticket and the stack of bills (or the check payable to the State...) you hand to the Court Clerk is going to be a lot higher.

Oh, and don't try the Back Roads at 2 AM trick - Portable Scales.

-->--

Reply to
Bruce L. Bergman (munged human readable)

You want one? I have one! For you, real cheep!!

(For the rest of you, Google up "Krups Type 223A Coffee Mill". Paramount Art Department stickers not included.)

-->--

Reply to
Bruce L. Bergman (munged human readable)

It was not overweight, the stuff on it was mostly light, with the exception of the shear on the back.

i

Reply to
Ignoramus5080

On 9/25/2012 7:56 AM, Ignoramus5080 wrote: ...

...

I was wondering if that load arrangement w/ the shear on the ass-end like that might not have caused an axle limit problem, though...

--

Reply to
dpb

Yeah, I know the shear is heaviest. If he's loading it that far back, that's telling me something down in the belly had to be just as heavy for him to offset the weight and get some of that shear behind the trailer axles. The big cylinder looks like a vertical boiler.

Because you sure the hell don't want to load it tail-heavy and unload the tongue/fifth wheel - or the tail tries to wag the dog.

And in something that big, a fishtail is going to scatter the entire load across all 8 lanes /real/ fast - I don't care how much chain you use and how heavy the binders, it ain't gonna be enough.

-->--

Reply to
Bruce L. Bergman (munged human readable)

Everything went fine, no fishtail

Reply to
Ignoramus5080

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.