Subject
- Posted on
Encoder suggestion
- 01-29-2007
January 29, 2007, 2:20 pm
Hi,
Anybody here knows a good source for absolute encoders (well, pots really)
that I can mount on a 3/4" shaft? I'm trying to implement a closed looping
position system, and I don't need more than 180 degrees range (+60 to -60
and some safety margin).
Thanks
Padu
Anybody here knows a good source for absolute encoders (well, pots really)
that I can mount on a 3/4" shaft? I'm trying to implement a closed looping
position system, and I don't need more than 180 degrees range (+60 to -60
and some safety margin).
Thanks
Padu
Re: Encoder suggestion
Gateway off Kearny Villa has some small timing belts and matching
pulleys that might work. You'll probably have to drill out the hubs of
the pulleys and use some epoxy to keep things on. Most pots have a 1/4"
shaft, so you should be set there.
Murphy's in El Cajon (Johnston, NORTH of Main Street -- thanks, John!
<g>) also has a decent selection of pulleys and various sizes of small
timing belts pulled off equipment.
-- Gordon
Re: Encoder suggestion
How are you ?
What are you building these days ?
I solved a similar solution with a lathe.
I bought some aluminum knobs with a quarter inch shaft hole.
I put the knobs on my lathe and turned them down to a 0.5 inch size.
Since the rotaional velocity is not too great you don't need it to be
highly balenced.
I would recomend getting a 1 inch diameter or larget dowel ( maple or
aluminum ) cut a 1 inch lenght , then drill a 1/4 hole all the way
through it.
Then lathe the hole up to the 3/4 diameter.
You can also do all of this on a drill press, although its tough to
get lots of precision.
Come on by to the SDRS meeting this weeked if you can
Thanks
Steve V
wrote:
and matching
Re: Encoder suggestion
Hi Steve! Long time huh?
I'm automating a gasoline ATV. I (thought I had) finished automating the
steering wheel, using an optical encoder on the output shaft of the
gearmotor. Turns out that using a relative encoder for that purpose is not
that practical.
That's what I've been thinking.
I think I found a good sensor for this application:
http://www.beiduncan.com/html/news/nr_9900.htm
It costs about $60 bucks and seems very robust and protected from the
elements. I believe a simple pot (contact) would start giving me headaches
later on. This is a Hall effect sensor, so there is no wear from friction.
Its input shaft is a 1/4" I believe, so what I will end up doing is cutting
the top of the ATV's steering shaft and fabricate a piece of cylindrical
aluminum that fits snugly inside the shaft and hold it with one or two
screws. Then I'll drill a hole that will match the encoder's shaft. Similar
to what you did above.
I'll try. If I had a trailler I could even tow the thing up there. Maybe in
the future.
Cheers
Padu
Re: Encoder suggestion
For a large diameter shaft like that, a through-hole angle sensor is useful.
These are used as steering shaft position sensors on cars. Some
are multi-turn devices, and many have both an encoder and a pot.
We used two of those on our DARPA Grand Challenge vehicle.
The pot was used at startup, and thereafter we read the encoder.
Only 1 degree resolution on the encoder, though.
John Nagle
Site Timeline
- » Mars Exploration Rovers Update - January 27, 2007
- — Next thread in » General Robotics Forum
-

- » Trademarking questions ... for those of you who have done it !
- — Previous thread in » General Robotics Forum
-

- » evoMUSART 2013: First CFP (with correct dates)
- — Newest thread in » General Robotics Forum
-

- » Bending 1/8 inch thick 7075-T6 aluminum
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-

- » Rysunek techniczny-pytania
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » Engineering Science (Polish)
-








