Subject
- Posted on
October 24, 2005, 11:49 am
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/status.html
SPIRIT UPDATE: Spirit Begins Downhill Drive - sol 634-640, Oct 21,
2005:
Spirit is healthy and has begun driving downhill from the top of
"Husband Hill" toward the south basin. Elevation maps produced from the
panoramic camera imagery taken at and near the summit of Husband Hill
showed a safe traverse (with vehicle tilts under about 20 degrees)
across ridge lines east of the summit. These ridge lines (informally
called "Haskin upper ridge" and "Haskin east ridge") are the planned
traverse paths for coming weeks. When possible, Spirit will drive each
day.
Sol-by-sol summaries:
Sol 634 (Oct. 15, 2005): Spirit finished investigating a rock outcrop
called "Hillary" near the summit of Husband Hill. Spirit used the alpha
particle X-ray spectrometer and the microscopic imager to study
Hillary,
then Spirit stowed the robotic arm. Spirit bumped back about 2 meters
(7
feet) from the outcrop to complete remote imaging. Spirit used the
miniature thermal emission spectrometer and panoramic camera to study
targets on Hillary.
Sol 635: Spirit drove 47 meters (154 feet) east from the summit.
Sol 636: Spirit took images with the navigation camera and performed
atmospheric observations.
Sol 637: Spirit drove 20 meters (66 feet) during the first of a series
of drives toward Haskin upper ridge. There is an apparent drop-off near
this ridge; therefore, each drive begins with a short 10-meter
(33-foot)
"blind" drive, followed by drives using hazard-avoidance cameras and
decreased limits on how far the rover can tilt in any direction. The
intent is to stop a drive short of any significant change in local
elevation.
Sol 638: Spirit drove 29 meters (95 feet) during the second drive to
the
Haskin upper ridge. Spirit also observed the moons Phobos and Deimos at
night.
Sol 639: Spirit covered 17 meters (56 feet) during the third drive of
the approach to Haskin upper ridge. This left Spirit about 15 meters
(49
feet) from the drop-off and near an area with rock outcrops.
Sol 640: Spirit's planned activities for sol 640 were devoted to remote
sensing of the east basin, expected to be within view after the third
leg of the sol 639 drive.
As of the end of sol 639, (Oct. 20, 2005), Spirit has driven 5,107
meters (3.17 miles).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPPORTUNITY UPDATE: Maneuvering Around Ripples - sol 613-618, Oct 21,
2005:
Opportunity is healthy and has been making excellent progress around
"Erebus Crater." At the beginning of the week, the rover was in
automode
as it was still recovering from a partial uplink, but on sol 614 the
team sent a real-time activate command and the rover performed remote
sensing. The team is no longer operating under restricted sols, and
Opportunity traveled 101.65 meters (333 feet) in four sols. The rover
is
generally heading westward around the crater, but traveled northward on
sol 618 to avoid some larger ripples to the west.
Sol-by-sol summaries:
Sol 613 (Oct. 14, 2005): The team planned untargeted remote sensing.
However, the master sequence did not run because Opportunity was in
automode.
Sol 614: The team sent a real-time command to activate the sol 614
master sequence. The plan included remote sensing.
Sol 615: Opportunity completed an 18.5-meter (61-foot) drive heading
westward around Erebus Crater.
Sol 616: Opportunity drove 24 meters (79 feet), with an average slip of
2.3 percent.
Sol 617: The rover completed a 43.65-meter (143-foot) drive, zigzagging
around low points in the ripples.
Sol 618: Opportunity completed a 15.5-meter (51-foot) drive on outcrop,
heading northward to find some lower ripples to cross.
As of sol 618 (Oct. 19, 2005) Opportunity has driven 6,138.07 meters
(3.81 miles).
SPIRIT UPDATE: Spirit Begins Downhill Drive - sol 634-640, Oct 21,
2005:
Spirit is healthy and has begun driving downhill from the top of
"Husband Hill" toward the south basin. Elevation maps produced from the
panoramic camera imagery taken at and near the summit of Husband Hill
showed a safe traverse (with vehicle tilts under about 20 degrees)
across ridge lines east of the summit. These ridge lines (informally
called "Haskin upper ridge" and "Haskin east ridge") are the planned
traverse paths for coming weeks. When possible, Spirit will drive each
day.
Sol-by-sol summaries:
Sol 634 (Oct. 15, 2005): Spirit finished investigating a rock outcrop
called "Hillary" near the summit of Husband Hill. Spirit used the alpha
particle X-ray spectrometer and the microscopic imager to study
Hillary,
then Spirit stowed the robotic arm. Spirit bumped back about 2 meters
(7
feet) from the outcrop to complete remote imaging. Spirit used the
miniature thermal emission spectrometer and panoramic camera to study
targets on Hillary.
Sol 635: Spirit drove 47 meters (154 feet) east from the summit.
Sol 636: Spirit took images with the navigation camera and performed
atmospheric observations.
Sol 637: Spirit drove 20 meters (66 feet) during the first of a series
of drives toward Haskin upper ridge. There is an apparent drop-off near
this ridge; therefore, each drive begins with a short 10-meter
(33-foot)
"blind" drive, followed by drives using hazard-avoidance cameras and
decreased limits on how far the rover can tilt in any direction. The
intent is to stop a drive short of any significant change in local
elevation.
Sol 638: Spirit drove 29 meters (95 feet) during the second drive to
the
Haskin upper ridge. Spirit also observed the moons Phobos and Deimos at
night.
Sol 639: Spirit covered 17 meters (56 feet) during the third drive of
the approach to Haskin upper ridge. This left Spirit about 15 meters
(49
feet) from the drop-off and near an area with rock outcrops.
Sol 640: Spirit's planned activities for sol 640 were devoted to remote
sensing of the east basin, expected to be within view after the third
leg of the sol 639 drive.
As of the end of sol 639, (Oct. 20, 2005), Spirit has driven 5,107
meters (3.17 miles).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPPORTUNITY UPDATE: Maneuvering Around Ripples - sol 613-618, Oct 21,
2005:
Opportunity is healthy and has been making excellent progress around
"Erebus Crater." At the beginning of the week, the rover was in
automode
as it was still recovering from a partial uplink, but on sol 614 the
team sent a real-time activate command and the rover performed remote
sensing. The team is no longer operating under restricted sols, and
Opportunity traveled 101.65 meters (333 feet) in four sols. The rover
is
generally heading westward around the crater, but traveled northward on
sol 618 to avoid some larger ripples to the west.
Sol-by-sol summaries:
Sol 613 (Oct. 14, 2005): The team planned untargeted remote sensing.
However, the master sequence did not run because Opportunity was in
automode.
Sol 614: The team sent a real-time command to activate the sol 614
master sequence. The plan included remote sensing.
Sol 615: Opportunity completed an 18.5-meter (61-foot) drive heading
westward around Erebus Crater.
Sol 616: Opportunity drove 24 meters (79 feet), with an average slip of
2.3 percent.
Sol 617: The rover completed a 43.65-meter (143-foot) drive, zigzagging
around low points in the ripples.
Sol 618: Opportunity completed a 15.5-meter (51-foot) drive on outcrop,
heading northward to find some lower ripples to cross.
As of sol 618 (Oct. 19, 2005) Opportunity has driven 6,138.07 meters
(3.81 miles).
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
badly? Its one thing to have a platform survive twice as long as mean
failure time, but this must be far longer than that? Did they actually
do new Mean Time between failure calculations for all the sub-asymblies
or were they using 20 year estimates based on assemblies with similar
functions that were actually made up of components of completely
unrelated nature. For example you can't get useful estimation of the
life of a CCD Camera from data taken from a camera based on a Vidicon
(sp) tube despite the similar function. In all likelyhood the two
cameras wouldn't share a single component, not even resistors. The
highest failure item in the tube based camera would almost certainly be
the tube, and it would likely drive the failure rate for the whole
camera. For a CCD camera with focus, the moving parts will be more
likely to fail than anything in the video change, but the total is
unlikely to approach that of a tube based camera.
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
Muddy:
I think it is largely just NASA gaming the system. By saying
that the mission is a 100% success if the rovers last 90 days,
they are much more assured that they can say the mission is
a success. NASA regularly plans on extended missions. Remember,
NASA ultimately has to get congress to approve these sorts of
missions. The more successes there are, the more follow
missions.
With regards to the Rovers, NASA was very concerned about
whether they would be able to survive the Mars winter season
due to extremely cold weather and short days (not enough
light to recharge the batteries.) The Mars rovers have
little pellets of Pu scattered around to keep critical
pieces of them warm (source: an article in Aviation Week
and Space Technology.) It seems like there was enough
light to keep the batteries charged up enough to survive
through the Martian winter. Frankly, it is a combination
of good engineering and a little bit of plain ol' good luck.
Lastly, I suspect that various parts of the rover are failing.
As long as the radio, drive train, and some portion of the
vision system works, they can keep motoring around.
-Wayne
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
Would you rather they had miscalculated and gotten three or four days
out of them only? Ideally, something that you design and build will perform
indefinately. Clearly they got the right people and contractors to do the
job.
It sounds like you are unhappy about the results. Suppose they were
only able to get the original 90 days out of the hardware and then it died
on the spot. We have all had a toaster, car, or computer that did that.
Would it have made you happier?
Suppose they had only lasted half as long, and you were the contractor
that had built the hardware. Now, would you feel like coughing up some sort
of differential pay for that, or for funding a whole new mission?
Mayeb you can talk them into adding "warranty timers" so that when the
calendar runs out, it will fire a bunch of little squibs that blow the
pieces off of the things. Of course, you would have to be a lunatic to try
this.
And your point would be...?
Look, the cost of making something that lasts under those environmental
conditions is identical to the cost of making something that will last 10
times longer, in most circumstances. One would think that getting more for
your money was a good thing, particularly if you were one of the taxpayers
who footed the bill. Do you have a real, valid complaint about the mission?
Cheers!
Sir Charles W. Shults III
Xenotech Research
321-206-1840
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
The expected lifetime and mission objectives were based on the
worst-case estimate of dust buildup on the solar panels. Sufficient
dust will deprive the rovers of power to the point where they can no
longer maintain their internal temperature, leading to failure of
temperature sensitive components. The dust wasn't as bad as expected
and occasional gusts of wind have cleared the solar panels
sufficiently for the rovers to continue operations.
The other components of the system are built to take launch, months in
space, entry and landing. Stuff built to take that doesn't just fall
apart rolling over sand dunes at a few inches an hour.
Tim
--
Shares are your votes in a pigologocracy.
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
They planned a three-month primary mission, based mostly on how long it
would take for dust settling onto the solar arrays to reduce power to
the point of causing trouble. Mind you, they weren't expecting immediate
problems after three months -- that was just the length of time for which
they were fairly confident there *wouldn't* be problems. They were
expecting more than three months of useful life, but they weren't sure
just how much.
And indeed, three months were no problem, but by the six-month mark,
available power for both rovers was down to about half the original level,
and it was starting to limit operations. Clearly the end wasn't that far
away. But then the decline stopped. And then Opportunity's available
power went *up* substantially in several small steps over a period of a
few weeks. And then Spirit's available power nearly doubled from one day
to the next.
We still don't fully understand just *what* has been clearing the dust off
the solar arrays, although it's presumably wind effects, possibly of
several kinds. (After Spirit's sudden power jump, images of its solar
arrays showed them almost clean *except* for streaks of dust in the wake
of bits of equipment sticking up above the surface.) Spirit in particular
may have had a dust devil pass right over it. In any case, nobody expected
any of this.
They wouldn't have bothered. Such calculations are *averages*; they mean
almost nothing when it comes to predicting the working life of specific,
individual components. None of the components or subassemblies inherently
had short lives(*), so there was no reason to expect hardware failures to
limit the rovers' working life.
(* Batteries in particular *can* have limited lives by design. Mars
Pathfinder wasn't meant to last long on the surface, so its designers
saved battery weight by using types whose working life is fairly short.
The death of its battery is almost certainly what killed MP, well after
the end of its brief primary mission. )
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@spsystems.net
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
And that was much worse a couple years ago before recent successes.
Mosty of thes failures were in entering orbit or landing.
So thats probably why they "over engineer" these half billion
dollar probes.
Re: Mars Exploration Rovers Update - October 21, 2005
NASA makes it happen for all of us... Lot's of inventions you see
everyday in your home and car use..
Happing roboting...
--
Dan Mathias
--------------------------
Future-Bot Components Web: http://www.futurebots.com
203 N. Pennock Lane Email: fuboco@futurebots.com
Jupiter, Fl. 33458 USA Phone/Fax (561) 575-1487
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Robotic and Electronic Components for the Hobbyist and Professional..
We have Motors, IC Chips, PC-Parts, Sensors, Robotic items......
Site Timeline
- » Using Mouse as rotation sensors
- — Next thread in » General Robotics Forum
-

- » Looking for Motor Controller
- — Previous thread in » General Robotics Forum
-

- » evoMUSART 2013: First CFP (with correct dates)
- — Newest thread in » General Robotics Forum
-

- » Bending 1/8 inch thick 7075-T6 aluminum
- — The site's Newest Thread. Posted in » General Metalworking
-

- » Rysunek techniczny-pytania
- — The site's Last Updated Thread. Posted in » Engineering Science (Polish)
-









