Awl --
Has anyone noticed the diffs in finish between climb and conventional?
Today I did a job on 1/4 CR, 2" in Y, and various lengths (3-6"), contouring, with some broad angles, nothing critical, just rough/finish passes, cupla holes.
For a number of peculiar reasons, I broke myriad$ of end mill$ (carbide, roughing, HSS, coated, uncoated, you name it -- goodgawd.... ), but was able to view the edge finish on the climb side and the conventional side amongst all these endmills, and noticed that *consistently* the conventional side had a noticeably better finish than the climb side.
Yet, in some previous threads, one discussing Heinz Putz and his videos, some suggested (including Heinz, iirc) cutting exclusively in climb, factors permitting.
Yet, on a BP, cutting in climb can be a real pita. Even on a radial arm saw, there is a big difference in feel between the climb and conventional cut. In a RAS, you can push with abandon in conventional, but can pull only with trepidation in climb.
Intuitively, and viscerally, and from Newtonian perspectives , I have always preferred the conventional cut, yet others with much more experience suggest otherwise. Having to do with transfer of heat to chips or sumpn, iirc.
Thus, I was surprised at the above consistent diffs in finish, in favor of conventional.
I really had to bend over backwards ito of speeds/feeds to get the climb side as nice as the conventional side, *and even then*, while the conventional side was bright and almost "polished", the climb side was at best "satin". .015 finish pass.
Overall presentable, but wound up being slower than one would have anticipated.