Phil: (all codes aside) please explain to me Why Neutral/Earth Bonding
at the Subpanel is Safer, being that the Neutral is already common with
Earth at the Meter/Service Disconnect offset location ?
I've only once encountered something like this and the panels ground &
neutral were isolated.
---------------------------------------
From: snipped-for-privacy@ipal.net
| I've run my own cable because the electric company wanted me to cut a
20' | easement of trees to put up poles and run the electric service.
Those bastards! Always wanting to cut down trees.
| I opted to have my meter base on a pole (similar to a mobile home
setup) | with a 200 AMP service box that is being used as the meter base
and | disconnect. It is grounded to a copper rod sunk 8' deep into the
earth.
|
| From that service box(on the pole) I've run two 4/0 HOT conductors and
one | 2/0 neutral underground. I have not run a separate grounding
conductor.
That lack of separate grounding conductor will make it more difficult.
| On the cabin, there is another 200 AMP service box. At the moment only
the | to hots and the neutral are connected to it (The power is not one
by the | way)
|
| My question was: Do I ground the service panel on the cabin and if so
do I | isolate the ground from the neutral.
This would be similar to a building to building feed. In this case the
pole is the main location, and the cabin is the subfeed location. If you
had fed this with the extra ground wire, you would need to keep the
neutral and ground separate. But since there is no ground wire, you need
to drive a couple grounding electrodes, ground a new grounding wire to
them, and bond the neutral to that.
But, there is one more issue. Any other metallic runs of anything, be it
water pipe, cable TV, or telephone, must stay AWAY from that pole. Any
current imbalance on the neutral will attempt do flow in parallel over
anything grounded at both ends near each point the power is grounded.
| I'm clear on the fact that I require a secondary ground, what I'm not
clear | on is wheather or not I isolate it from the ground.
You need to ground the neutral at both ends due to lack of grounding
wire in order to protect against extreme voltages induced by weather.
{{{{{watt?}}}}}
But that said, I also know this is not that great a protection. By
grounding the neutral on each end, it will ground out these voltage
differences. But the hot wires are still poorly protected by that.
----------------------------
LOOK: If You have a bonded neutral at the (Pole) Service disconnect/
Meter Panel, why do you want to Bond the Neutral Circuit conductor to
Earth at subpanel again, wouldn't that provide a closer path for stray
voltage to lag round the Cabin ?????., doesn't it make sense to leave
the neutral bond to the service disconnect / meter and just add an
isolated equipment ground for the cabin ?????
___________________
An alternative that I feel is safer, although more expensive, is to use
a transformer to derive a neutral at the cabin, and just power it with
the two hots only. Then the 3rd wire can be used as a true ground (but
do not connect it to the neutral supplied by the power company in this
case). This could be an auto-transformer, which would provide a DC path
to ground for any static charge buildup.
| Also, I'm guessing I will have to use a much larger conductor than a
#6 for | the ground. Do I use the same size throughout the grounding
system?
It's best to have the grounding wire be the same size as current
conductors anywhere they are. The code allows smaller grounding wire in
certain cases, but you should be fine with the same size everywhere.
--
----------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard KA9WGN =A0 =A0 =A0 |
formatting link
=A0 =A0
formatting link
| | (first name) at ipal.net |
formatting link
=A0
formatting link
|
----------------------------------------------
=AE~>