Oooooo.... wow, that is wild!
A - pay up M$! (***)
B - re-write your security M$! (total loss!)
*** and the winners are,.. Sony Corp. of America and Royal Philips
So, other OS's have a much better chance in the market, while this sh*t
hits the fan.
Which btw, may open things up in the next few years, could be very
Yep, the thieves (the irony, security software) always get caught,
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
The major CAD/CAM systems have no problems running on multiple
platforms, even networked. AFAIK most are producing exactly the same
binary part files independent of the platform. Those that may not are, no
using network on-the-fly translations, totally transparent to the users.
Now, if IBM's big blue iron catches on again .... <shrug> <G>.
You're talking apples and oranges.
I've worked with and I'm sure many here have worked on different OS's
(besides windoze) so I do not understand you concern?
It's not a significant issue at all, imho.
Solid modelers on the otherhand all have their own way of doing
something and neither of them can really talk to eachother.
CAD/CAM/CAE/CAI.. are all islands with crude make shift boats sharing
data between eachother.
And with that in mind, the industry seems like a bunch of buoys with no
clear direction or interest to communicate with eachother.
Fat buoys like Ade$k attract a lot of followers and they eventually sink
and users move to the next buoy, like SW.
But, the most important thing is to watch out for those darn seagulls!
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
I guess my concern would be just sending a file saved in OS "A" which may do
things differently then OS "B". Some of the problems associated with Windows
has to do with bloated file sizes, so would these same files open ok in OS
"B". Maybe I am blowing it out of proportion, but more OS's just sounds like
another variable in the matrix.
Just talk with any of the older developers that had to deal with the
various "flavors" of Unix - it was a nightmare. They were more than
happy to settle on one system, no matter what is was.
This has the potential to be a nightmare come true for many CAE
developers and end users.
It takes too much time developing even for different windows
flavours (9x/NT) let alone for complete different OS's.
Different programming languages are needed, different layouts,
different testing, variety of bugs, expense builds up and on and on.
Basically anything will take longer to develop. Eventually, companies
(like SW) will choose one platform and not develop for the others
(which is already the case) as this would make the specific knowledge
very shallow, and thus the resulting software features would be too.
From users point of view will be even worse.
Next time a company which has to choose between CAD systems
will also have to choose between OS's.
So if you've invested, say, on SW and 2000/XP (not just the
software but above all training across the organisation, and all
sorts of other office utilities and special third party applications,
databases which have taken years to perfect / build up, MRP /ERP
systems to talk to, and so on), would you be willing to switch over
to a better CAD system on some totally different OS? No, I think
you'll find your boss will shoot you in flames for even suggesting it.
A choice would almost tie you down for life.
Quite frankly you would have much less choice then today.
I don't think it's only Microsoft's nature to be so monopolistic, I
believe it's the human nature. If you shoot this one down there will
be another one to take its place. If Linux was there earlier it would
have probably developed the same taste for money as Microsoft
has. At the end of the day who cares what the OS is, the only thing
users care about is the applications they run in them and developers
don't want to program in a million programming languages to
support new and old OS's at different development stages.
Do you think this world would be better if everyone spoke one
language? No doubt it would. Communication which has caused
the biggest wars and problems on this planet's history would vanish.
People would then concentrate on doing something with their life
rather then waste half of it learning another language or two. Doesn't
mean to say cultures would be lost, just look at the US, UK, Canada,
Australia, etc, they can be a world apart sometimes.
Just leave the OS alone.
There are lots of vendors. Those developed on UNIX port to MS and
those developed on MS don't port to anything else well AFAIK.
Too much MS-specific code gets used ....
Don't think for a moment that MS does not well know this and
smile a lot on their way to the bank.
firstname.lastname@example.org (Cliff Huprich) wrote in
Or else the effort of porting a UNIX app to Windows promises a better
return on the dollar than the reverse. You can't tell me that an app
written to run in UNIX isn't riddled with UNIX-specific code.
But whatever the reason, yes, I agree Microsoft is smiling all the way to
I was talking to some of the pro-e guys, and they said it was easy to port
back to Linux because they never used any windows specific code. (or at
least not enough to make a difference.)
and as far as return on investment goes, if i don't buy windows (or mac), I
can afford photoshop. And stop using my pirated copy. :)
(not that I use photoshop, tho. The GIMP does all I need it to do, really.
which granted isn't much.)
I realize that.
Point is, when they ported to windoze, they apparently never fell into the
trap of using too much windows specific code.
Which allowed them go back to a unix-like OS without too much trouble.
Now, their _other_ apps may be a problem. they may have been written for
Well, if PTC had decided to fully adopt the Windows philosophy then there
would be TONS of Windows-specific code in there despite its origins.
That's the point being made here. Because PTC stuck to their conviction
that cross-platform consistency was more important than melding smoothly
with the world's most popular desktop OS, they were able to transition to
Linux with relative ease.
To bad for Ford they never figured out how to convince the government to
build highways that were "enhanced" for Model-T usage.
"Consarnit! I can't get there from here! This damn on ramp isn't
compatible with my Oldsmobile!"
very funny! :~)>
what makes things more funny is the truth behind it. the above statement
reminds bob z. of the webpages that won't show up on his computer (at home)
unless he sets opera to identify as M$/IE.
"people with less brain power than you are doing more difficult things
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.