UL dielectric testing.

May 02, 2007 10 Replies

Hello,



I am working on a unit which takes upto 277VAC. It is failing the AC to GND dielectric testing at about 700V. It also fails the dielectric testing between low voltage input ( sensor inputs ) and the load outputs at about 400V. Can anyone suggest how to design effeciently for dielectric testing ?



Thanks,



Sandeep



Nobody can tell you why it failed without knowing what the components and circuit are. You should hire a consultant to evaluate the design and recommend appropriate changes.

Ben Miller

formatting link

Usually, it is related to two widley separated (electrically) nodes being too close (physically) to each other.

I know that is very simplified, but that is what usually happens.

It can be clearance distances through air, creepage distances along a surface, or leakage current (for any number of reasons). Any of these things can be within the final product, or in a component of the product. It could also be test procedure error, especially in light of his mention of testing between sensor inputs and load outputs. We have absolutely no information about the product, and there are far too many possibilities to speculate.

Ben Miller

formatting link

It can be clearance distances through air, creepage distances along a surface, or leakage current (for any number of reasons). Any of these things can be within the final product, or in a component of the product. It could also be test procedure error, especially in light of his mention of testing between sensor inputs and load outputs.

We have absolutely no information about the product, and there are far too many possibilities to speculate.

Ben Miller

formatting link

Is there some reason that you had to post it twice?

I didn't "have" to. Thunderbird said it didn't go through, so I posted again. S*#t happens.

Ben Miller

A Mail and news reader from Mozilla. It is a companion to Mozilla's Firefox browser. Both programs beat the pants off of Microsoft's.

Ben Miller

Agreed that anything that gives Bill, back the finger that he has given us, is good....BUT I'd hardly say Mozilla "beats the pants off" MS. Both have certain faults and although the faults are not the same one compared to the other, on average they do come out about even. Hence, being reason enough to go with Mozilla just to stick it to Bill.

Those damned piss poor news clients! You try smoking them out... you try scrubbing them out, and still... dirty stains.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required