acceleration versus frequency question

Hi,

I have a time series of accelerations (acceleration versus time) and I need to convert it to acceleration versus frequency. At a glance my first idea was to take the Fourier transform of the data set which would give power versus frequency and then use some kind of existing proportionality to get acceleration versus frequency. The first step (taking the Fourier transform) is trivial but I'm not sure how to proceed after that. Furthermore, I'm not even sure if this approach is correct. Could someone who has done something similar to this in that past give me an idea how to proceed? Thanks.

Rory

Reply to
news.verizon.net
Loading thread data ...

You are on the right track. Getting the calibration right is tricky. One way to look at it is to use energy compensation. The total energy in the spectrum should be the same as the total (RMS) energy in the time history.

This means that the height of the peaks will be 'wrong', but you can't have everything.

Incidentally, when you are trying out a new FFT always analyse a pure sine wave to see if you get what you are expecting.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Reply to
Greg Locock

What am I missing? Why is the transform of a(t) => P(w)?

jim andrews

Reply to
jim andrews

Nothing, I think.

Um, that's an unanswerable question. try alt.sci.why.is.the.universe.the.way.it.is

You could try the links in

formatting link
More helpfully, bung me a copy of your data in some sort of ascii format and some details of calibrations and I'll try and give you a result, and explain how I got there. I have a feeling you might be worried about philosophical details that we tend to run roughshod over.

Cheers

Greg Locock

Reply to
Greg Locock

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.