electroless nickel plating, > 11% by weight phosphorus - challenges?

What are the challenges in plating high-phosphorus electroless nickel, with
a phosphorus content of > 11% by weight? My understanding is that this type
of electroless nickel is completely amorphous and pit free (and
non-magnetic), offering the best corrosion protection. It also minimizes
tool wear for diamond turning applications, compared to deposits of lower
phosphorus content. Reportedly, it also offers the lowest levels of trace
contaminants. Over the 10%-11% P range, there is transition from
crystalline/magnetic to amorphous/non-magnetic. So, a > 11% P specification
assures consistency. Yet my experience suggests that few job shops
(platers) are capable (or even willing) to deposit such nickel. Why is it
more difficult to plate > 11% P electroless nickel compared to > 10% P?
MacDermid's website
formatting link
states plating rates of 0.3-0.5 mil/hr for high phos. (10-13% P) compared to
0.6-1.0 mil/hr for mid phos. (5-9% P). Is plating rate the driving economic
factor, or are there other factors that make the process difficult to
establish and maintain?
I've posted a similar question on
formatting link

Reply to
Grant Kiehne
Loading thread data ...
Note, the bath used to deposit > 11% P is sometimes called a "disk bath" since this type of electroless nickel is used on memory (hard) disks.
Reply to
Grant Kiehne
Not certain what difficulties lie in the actual plating process for electroless nickel with a phosphorus content > 11% by weight. However, I believe that the higher the phosphorus, the more brittle the plating layer will be ( whether it is baked or not, post plating). Might be very sensitive to flaking if the plated part flexes in-service?
Greg .
Reply to
Hello Grant,
Have you received any useful information in response to your postings?
Thanks, Gerry
Reply to
You receive this post from PhysOrg Forums:
formatting link
by Jerry Du (Jun 18 2004, 03:56 PM )
Your understanding on the properties of high phos electroless nickel is correct. In fact high phos electroless nickel has been used for years in the indutry. The largest application for electroless nickel is for memory disk EN layer plating which uses high phos EN (~12%P, by weight). High phos deposit can be plated in a very stable rate and quality. Remember, the requirement for memory disk is much higher than general metal finishing. OMG Fidelity is the largest electroless nickel supplier in the indutry and the sole supplier for memory disk application in the US
formatting link
It is true that the plating rate of high phos bath (>11%P) is generally slower than mid phos bath (5-19%P). The main reason for the plating rate difference is the difference in their chelate and stablizer package used. It is possible to raise the plating rate to about 0.7 mil/hour, but pushing the rate too far will cause deposit property to change. I hope this will help you to clear some of the question. You can contact me if you need any specific assistance.
Find the original post here:
formatting link
Reply to
A question concerning this:
It was stated that there is a switch from crystalline/magnetic to amorphous/non-magnetic. What is the mechanism causing this switch, does it have to do with the change in deposition, or just the change in %P. (Just interested)
Thanks Seth
Reply to
Seth Imhoff

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.