Intelligent house or intelligent robot

John Casey wrote:


Matthew Smith wrote:

circulating pumps)

non-critical alerts

Why not pipe it?
There comes a point when the cost of a lot of special purpose machines in an intelligent house will equal the cost of a general purpose robot. A general purpose robot would adapt to each house and its set of special purpose appliances and physical layouts.
A general purpose robot could do all the things you mention above. The cost of an "intelligent" house is high. A flexible robot could configure into a bath (or bed) hoist. It could monitor smoke, temperature and monitoring people, animals, etc can be done by cheap (less than $30) web cams with intelligent software.
- John Casey

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
JGCASEY wrote:

I still prefer the distributed approach - a set of independent devices that can communicate with each other and still function even if the master controller (I use a redundant second controller since it's also my main office server) should fail.
Although a single machine which could "shadow" the client throughout the day may be versatile enough to cater for every need, it will never have the resilience of a distributed system.
Two different approaches - I'm sure that we could find examples of both in nature.
John - just out of interest, how would you address the resilience issue?
--
Matthew Smith
Kadina Business Consultancy, South Australia
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Matthew Smith wrote:

So you want me to get real :)
A general purpose robot is perhaps as unlikely as the "helicopter in every garage" prediction made in the 1950's for the homes beyond 2000. What is theoretically possible may not happen for reasons not considered. The home robot may be limited to carpet sweeping drones or novelty waiters serving drinks.
The technology already exists for an intelligent home to monitor the residences needs. It is really only a matter of how cost effective it is in terms of health care.
Resilience perhaps could be greatly enhanced by a combination of land line, cable and mobile phone connections to an internet service. Each home system could be monitored and immediate action take place if they failed to report in.
An intelligent companion doesn't need to have a mobile body. In fact a virtual friend is perhaps more feasible in the near future to provide a friendly non judgmental companion to talk to if the old person is feeling lonely? Or perhaps a furry version of the Sony robot dog that is sensitive to the owners emotional needs?
As for physical needs such as getting out of a bath, off the toilet, out of bed and so on the problem there is cost. The solution is usually limited to hand rails. There are chairs that can tip the person into the standing position and beds that change shape but they all cost money.
I have always considered the showers could be improved. Just stand there while you go through a soap cycle, rinse cycle, dry cycle just like a car wash, water from every direction as old people may have limited movement.
Had the same idea while changing nappies. Put the baby waist deep in a wash machine that dissolves the nappy and goes through the soap, rinse, dry, powder cycle. Lift baby out, job done :)
Nature never meant us to grow old. We all have a different built in life span which for most of us men is early 70's. Modern medicine means we can all linger on beyond our allotted time.
Perhaps one day there will be biological solution to old age so elderly care will cease to be an issue.
- John
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

What fun to be on the beta test team for!
Step two, in untangling your infant's dangly bits from the maceration roller. Using the large pliers, back the roller up slowly turning counterclockwise about half a turn..

The Eskimos had that, but it wouldn't be popular today.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
John Casey wrote:

Dave VanHorn wrote:

There wouldn't be any roller of course! I was thinking more like a spa bath with moving or pulsating water jets.

Not with those over 70 anyway :)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.