ARM: Review - "The Staghound in Canadian Service"

Book Review: "Weapons of War" Series; The Staghound in Canadian
Service by Roger V. Lucy; Service Publications, PO Box 333071, Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada, K2C 3Y9, 2007; 24 pp. with B&W photos and 1/35 scale
plans; price CDN $9.95; ISBN 978-1-894581-37-0 (http://
formatting link

Advantages: well-timed publication release coincides with two new
plastic model kits of the Staghound; nice operational history of the
Disadvantages: could probably have used some more comments on markings
from a modeler's standpoint
Rating: Highly Recommended
Recommendation: for all armored car and Commonwealth armor fans
There are few American weapons built during the Second World War
which did not serve with the US Armed Forces in some way, shape or
form. Even the P-63 Kingcobra had a number of aircraft serve as
gunnery trainers. (There are others, such as the Martin Maryland and
Baltimore, but those were designed for overseas sales and little used
by the USAAF.)
The Staghound armored car is one of the few that was built and
accepted for service with the US Army, but never used or wanted by
them and thus nearly 100% of its considerable production run went to
the Commonwealth for use as a heavy armored car. The US Army instead
opted for the lighter M8 6 x 6 Armored Car and its companion M20 6 x 6
Armored Utility Car as they fit the US Army model for cavalry scouting
vehicles. The US Army considered reconnaissance more important than
combat, whereas the Commonwealth doctrine saw heavy armored cars used
to engage light targets and provide infantry support.
The Staghound began as a 1941 US concept for a medium to heavy
armored car, and was the 4 x 4 GM (Chevrolet) contender as the T17E1
versus a 6 x 6 vehicle dubbed the T17 from Ford. The T17E1 wsa
determined to be the winner, but as it weighed nearly 14 tons (or more
than the M3 light tank) it was considered as a "wheeled tank" by the
Ordnance Board in November 1942. The British, thus far unable to come
up with a suitable heavy armoured car design, liked what they saw and
while under test order 2000 of them in February 1942. Overall, the
British order ran to 2,687 Staghound armoured cars and 789 Staghound
AA vehicles (T17E2) with an open turret and twin M2HB .50 caliber
machine guns. These were delivered between October 1942 and December
The British developed four versions of the Staghound on the Chevrolet
chassis: the Staghound I, armed with a 37mm gun in a three-man turret;
the Staghound II, which replaced the 37mm gun with a British 3"
howitzer; an American variant dubbed the T17E3 which was not further
developed, which replaced the enclosed turret with the open turret
from the M8 HMC with its 75mm howitzer; and the Staghound III, which
swapped the 37mm turret for the complete turret from a Crusader Mk.
III tank fitted with a 75mm gun.
The Canadians, via the Canadian Army Overseas or CAOS and as part of
the Commonwealth forces, requested Staghounds in September 1942. The
Canadian Fox I armoured car, a cross between a Humber armored car and
a GMC truck chassis, was not suitable and they wanted to get a good,
useful armored car for service in the ETO. Originally the Canadians
wanted the T17 Ford armored car, but it was the loser in the US
competition so they turned to the T17E1 as well. The Canadians
eventually received enough Staghounds to equip two full regiments, the
1st Armoured Car Regiment (Royal Canadian Dragoons) and the 18th
Armoured Car Regiment (12th Manitoba Dragoons), as well as several
independent reconnaissance squadrons with divisions.
Changeover for British service to the vehicles was minor. All of the
turreted vehicles were fitted with a 2" smoke mortar on the right
front of the turret and the standard British No. 19 Radio Set (an HF
AM set, unlike the standard US Army VHF FM radio sets in use and hence
the necessary changes) in the turret bustle. Communications variants
had their armament removed and were fitted with an American SCR-299
high power HF AM command set with a range of 200 kilometers. A
turretless command variant, dubbed "Charger", was provided for
regimental commanders.
Other options included the Bantu mine roller device, a roller system
using electromagnets to detect buried mines but not set them off. The
most useful device developed was a pair of 12 foot sections of No. 9
track bridge carried by one Staghound in a troop (three vehicles) that
was useful for crossing ditches or short gaps. Other variants included
rocket armed Staghounds with 60-lb rocket rails on the turret or a
truly enterprising version with two 4-round "Land Mattress" launchers
on the sides of the turret. These did have some problems, and Mr Lucy
has included one photo of this vehicle with crushed rear fenders
(mudguards) where the backblast of the rockets pressed them down.
Overall each of the regiments had a headquarters and four line
squadrons of five line troops each with a total of 58 Staghound
armored cars, two communications versions, and 5 AA Staghounds in its
basic TO&E. There were also 8 Staghound II or III fire support
vehicles per regiment. Later another 14 Staghounds were added for a
total of 72.
The book covers the wartime exploits of the two regiments, and also
provides a great selection of photos that should assist modelers in
building up either the Bronco or Italeri kits of this neat little
vehicle. They seem to indicate no two vehicles were the same nor did
they receive the same modifications, with ammunition chests either
welded to front fenders or in once case having the fenders cut out so
the chests sit parallel to the ground. Markings details are somewhat
sketchy but photos do give some indication on markings and locations,
as they varied a great deal even with the two regiments. Photos of
postwar Staghound use in Canada are also provided.
Overall, this is a very handy and timely book and one anyone building
a Staghound model will want to get his hands on!
Thanks to Clive Law for the review copy.
Cookie Sewell
Reply to
Loading thread data ...

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.