Re: Real Flight

> Recently I became the General Manager of Knife Edge Software, makers of > the Real Flight R/C simulator.

Does RF work on Server 2003? I asked GP and the answer was sort of "some of us have it running on 2003 but it's not on the official list, so...".

Reply to
Pete Ritter
Loading thread data ...

Use OpenGL instead of DirectX, and then port it to Linux.

How about following up on your post?

Can't stand web forums. The UIs all suck rocks.

Reply to
Grant Edwards

I (quixotically) second that request!

Reply to
Pete Ritter

LONG LIVE LINUX! Now if we can just convince Adobe and Macromedia to switch gears...

~John

Reply to
John

You're a good man, Sancho! Hand me my lance, I see another giant on the horizon...

Reply to
Grant Edwards

Hi There

Nice to see mfgs and distribs reading the posts - so I thought I would mention that there are many millions of Apple Mac users out here - and some of us would like to see a r/c simulator? Think about it hey.

David

Reply to
David

I have about 15 years of Linux experience so I can definitely see the appeal of an OpenGL/Linux version. We're trying to get away from our DirectX dependence.

I'll keep tabs on rec.models.rc.air but if you want to contact me directly then seek me out at my usual haunts.

Jim

-- jbourke

Owner/Manager of RCGroups.com

formatting link

General manager of Knife Edge Software, makers of RealFlight

formatting link

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted from the RCGroups.com Discussion Forums. Visit us at

formatting link

Reply to
jbourke

Most people use Windows(XP). Get over the fact you use some oddball o/s and someone should give a rats ass about your computer.

formatting link

Reply to
Bousch

Actually, in Microsoft's last look into the matter, there were more systems worldwide running 95 and 98 then all the rest put together. That's why they are pushing all these new features in Web pages that need IE6 or higher. Can't put it on a 95 machine, and wont be long before they "fix" IE so it wont run on 98. And yes, there are many of us that like an OS that is smaller than the XP patches.

Reply to
John Alt

A) That's simply not true.

2) If a billion people do a stupid thing, it's still a stupid thing. ;)

That last sentance doesn't even make sense.

He asked for suggestions, I gave him one. He's free to ignore it. I suspect that the sales of a Linux port cant justify the cost required to switch from DirectX to OpenGL.

Reply to
Grant Edwards

How do you get 15 years of Linux experience when Linus didn't even begin developing it until 1991? ;-)

Reply to
user

We could be using OS/2, but IBM has always had rather crappy marketing. I liked OS/2 and hoped mightly that IBM would succeed - but alas......

David

Reply to
David AMA40795 / KC5UH

We could have been using CP/M. The last 'popular' 8086 OS that actually WORKED.

Gary Kildall, RIP.

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

gawd..it IS that long, isn't it :-(

>
Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

Yup. And we had to walk 10 miles to work in snow so deep we tripped over telegraph wires and then had to chop wood for the stove when we got there.

Reply to
Grant Edwards

Good point. My first experience with LINUX was in 1994 or 1995.

My experience with UNIX prior to 1991 was less than day-to-day, so we can call it 13 years if you are keeping track. :)

Jim

-- jbourke

Owner/Manager of RCGroups.com

formatting link

General manager of Knife Edge Software, makers of RealFlight

formatting link

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted from the RCGroups.com Discussion Forums. Visit us at

formatting link

Reply to
jbourke

Probably he most inglorious but utterly reliable OS ever made.

Didn't do a lot, but what it did do, it did with no glitches whatsoever...

Reply to
The Natural Philosopher

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.