Freaky Amazing DMM?!

I'm testing a new DMM I purchased, AM-240 by Amprobe. It claims *over*

100Mohm impedance in 400.0mV mode. So I charged a 4.7uF Mylar capacitor to 36mV DC, and then placed the AM-240 (while in 400mV DC mode) across the Mylar cap. After 25 minutes and 40 seconds it was 35..2mV. That comes to 14Gohms. So I thought it may be due to bias current or offset voltage, and reversed the DMM polarity. Same results. So then I charged the Mylar to 200mV. Same results.

Then, I measured the parallel resistance of my 4.7uF Mylar cap by charging it to 184.8mV, disconnected the AM-240, and 1050 seconds later connected the AM-240 and measured 177.1mV. That comes to

5.25Gohms, which is what I would expect from this capacitor. Actually, for months I've been telling people my guesstimate for this cap is 5Gohms.

Anyhow, what kind of circuit are they using in this AM-240? It appears as if it *resists* change! When it is disconnected it tends to somewhat maintain the DC voltage, regardless of polarity. IOW, lets say it's measuring the DC voltage on the Mylar cap, and it's 180mV. Then one of the leads is removed. The AM-240 DC voltage decreases a bit, not too much, but it slows down, and tends to hang around, say

160mV. If I reverse the polarity, to -180mV, the same thing happens except it hangs around at -160mV. If the AM-240 was measuring say 35mV, and then disconnected, it tends to hand around at oh 20mV to 30mV.

Very interesting DMM. Not sure to like or dislike this.

Thanks for any info. Paul

Reply to
Paul
Loading thread data ...

It could have a guard ring around the input fed from a voltage follower connected to the input. If the gain of the voltage follower is above unity, it could result in something that "resists" change. Difference wrt polarity could be as a result of voltage follower non-linearity.

-- Sue

Reply to
Palindrome

Nothing new there, many DMM's have selectable "high impedance" or "HI-Z" modes on the mV range. e.g. the Fluke 87.

The input impedance is so high that the small input capacitance maintains a charge when you disconnect. A bit disconcerting when your meter doesn't read zero, but it comes good when you connect a source.

Dave.

Reply to
David L. Jones

It's almost certainly a bootstrapped input amplifier, with the bootstrap gain slightly over unity.

Clifford Heath.

Reply to
Clifford Heath

I've looked at the specs of ~ 30 DMM's today, include a lot of fluke's, and never seen anything near 14Gohms impedance. Keithley has an electrometer that's probably higher. Most DMM's are around 10Mohms (not gigaohms) input impedance. Don't you think 14 gigaohms is a bit high?

PL

Reply to
Paul

Thanks Clifford! I think you nailed it. Anyhow, this is a first for me, and a pleasant surprise to learn of this.

I have no affiliation with Amprobe, but as far as inexpensive ($40) DMM's go, this one seems like a gem. I was going to take it back today at Frys Electronics for the PM51A because it claims 1Gohm impedance, while the AM-240 only says > 100Mohms. Hmmm, 14G is far greater than

100M, lol. I'll keep it.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

BTW, here's a bootstrapped input amp circuit -->

formatting link
Thanks Clifford.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

What's it's input capacitance?

RL

Reply to
legg

No, it's a good thing, it's like that by design. Yes, normal meters have a 10Mohm resistor on the input. One ones with "HI-Z" mode remove this resistor and rely just on the input impedance of the FET gate and other circuitry which is there. This value varies a *lot* which is why they typically don't specify it, they just call it "high impedance" mode. E.g. Fluke do not specify the value on their 87 meter, not even a minimum (BTW, hold the Hz button when you power-up to get this mode).

When you need this mode, the input impedance can never be high enough! e.g. when measuring very high impedance circuitry (you can buy Gohm range resistors for example). Actually, even "normal impedance" stuff causes a problem with a 10Mohm input. e.g. you can start seeing errors creep in measuring say >10Kohm stuff.

The cheap Protek 506 & 608 are other meters that have this (not selectable) on the mV range. They spec it at simply >1Gohm.

Dave.

Reply to
David L. Jones

I don't see it listed on the spec sheet, but I've seen a lot of other similar Amprobe meters that are around 30pF input.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

I'll check out that Fluke. BTW, one thing of significance with my test is that the AM-240 was maintaining the charge on the 4.7uF Mylar! IOW, if I disconnected the AM-240, then the Mylar slowly discharge at a rate equivalent to 5.25Gohms, but when the AM-240 was connected, then the 4.7uF Mylar hardly discharge. Actually, it discharged, but at such a slow rate, equivalent to 14Gohms.

So, what shocked me was that AM-240 help the Mylar retain it's charge. Polarity didn't matter, which rules out bias current or voltage offset. I guess it's a bootstrapping circuit.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

The Agilent U1253A also has it. Spec is ">1Gohm". There are quite a few meters I've seen over the years that have it too. I think I even saw it on one of those $10 disposable meters too.

Dave.

Reply to
David L. Jones

Most likely an R-C circuit (maybe 10M and 1uF) going into a CMOS analog circuit with almost no leakage typically (at room temperature).

Reply to
Spehro Pefhany

I doubt it, just a high impedance CMOS input circuit (along with the usual protection stuff).

Dave.

Reply to
David L. Jones

I think the Agilent U1253A typically lists for $450. That's a bit more expensive then the $40 AM240. Do you have model # for the $10 one?

PL

Reply to
Paul

How could it nearly stop the Mylar from discharging. When the meter is disconnected from the Mylar, then nothing is connected to the Mylar, and it discharges at a rate equivalent to 5Gohms. So even if you connect a DMM that has infinite impedance, it's not going to make the Mylar discharge at a slower rate. Somehow the AM240 is *maintaining* the Mylars charge. I'm still thinking about this, lol.

PL

Reply to
Paul

Hardly comparing apples and oranges! If you are purely after "the cheapest meter that has a high impedance mV range" then that's a different ball game.

No, sorry. These things come and go like the wind.

Dave.

Reply to
David L. Jones

[snip]

That's true, but once you have the kinks worked out it's not too difficult to measure sources with megaohm impedance. As you know, you have to use low bias current meters or circuits, like an electrometer with femto bias current. If say the meter has 10pA, and the DUT impedance is 100Mohms, then that's 10pA * 100Mohms =3D 1mV caused just from the meter itself. If the electrometer is 10fA, then it drops to

1uV. Then you have thermoelectric effects unless you use a balanced circuit such as an instrumentation op-amp. After a while of working out the kinks, you can get very stable predictable measurements on high impedance sources.

You probably know all of that. It can take some time to work out the kinks, but such low signal high impedance sources is usually no big deal for a EE who's spent a lot of years working in such a field.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

I have a few $3 DMM's from Harbor freight, but they're 2Mohm impedance in the 200mV setting.

PL

Reply to
Paul

Another test. I just connected the AM240 (while in 400.0mV mode) to my Keithley. It measured no bias current. The Keithley resolution is

10pA. So that's cool. It has 14Gohm impedance, and who knows how much bias current, definitely less than 10pA.

Paul

Reply to
Paul

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.