1. Home
  2. ⚙ Mechanical Engineering
  3. My god, is this a next century segway?

My god, is this a next century segway?

You gotta see this. This is a reverse pendulum one wheel motorcycle design by a Canadian team. Unlike the Segway it does not cost 100 million to develop. `The gyroscopes are enough to balance the Embrio, the vehicle is also kept longitudinally stable by a smaller wheel that operates like an airplane's landing gear. It touches the ground when the vehicle is stopped or just starting. Once the Embrio is in motion, the landing gear will retract when the vehicle reaches about 12 mph. During braking, the gear redeploys when the vehicle slows to 12 mph.` Unlike the Segway, in order to stop the Segway has to go slightly faster. Do you think this will ever sell? Here take a look.

formatting link
or here

formatting link

Reply to
Ricky Spartacus
Loading thread data ...

The photo appears to be of a non- working model.

Note especially the subtle transition from present to future tense, and inclusion of the word 'concept' in lower case adjacent the product name.

I.e., "... it _would_ ..." work this way, emphasis mine.

It would, when pigs would fly.

-Mike-

Reply to
Mike Halloran

Dear Mike Halloran:

Like this: URL:

formatting link
or this one (which takes a while to load...): URL:
formatting link
David A. Smith

Reply to
dlzc1.cox

You right it did say "concept" and `no working model yet.` I can't beleive someone would say that pigs can fly when they think pigs should fly based on prior technology or acheivements. E.g. the Segaway works, so can the Embrio they say. Does this mean they don't have patent rights? I assume you need a working model to file a patent.

Reply to
Ricky Spartacus

No, you haven't needed a working model to file a patent for a long time. I think it was a decade ago that the USPTO auctioned off what they could, and discarded the remainder, of their accumulated patent model collection.

Okay, it _could_ 'work', in the sense that you could build something like it, and it could be pseudo- stable, given enough computers and enough gyroscopes and enough training wheels, and you could ride it around a parking lot. Riding it in traffic, or into an average metropolitan pothole, would be suicidal, as with the Segway.

My annoyance was directed toward the breathless prose of the press release, that tries so hard to give the impression that it's a fait accompli, and tosses in gratuitous buzzphrases like "hydrogen fuel cell" power for good measure, when it's a _very_ long way from production, and a _much_ longer way from commercial success.

-Mike-

Reply to
Mike Halloran

The design statement says it all: "This project was conceived as an exercise in forward thinking: what will the future of recreational transportation be like?"

And, I think something like this will be more likely built in this century and not the next. 2100 is a loooong ways away! Will it sell? Let's see, looks cool, goes fast. Yep, it will sell. :)

Reply to
Dan Bollinger

Not since about 1920.

You can be sure it is a model. Dan

Reply to
Dan Bollinger

Hi Guys, If you need to shop around more, just go to

formatting link

Aaron

Reply to
aarontan.spark

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.