Size is the problem. If not for the size, I could easily buy an RC tank, rip off the turret and add a claw. The problem is that all RC tanks are too big. I believe that they are all made in China at one factory and are all essentially the same tank, with different shells that are put on for various retailers.
Maybe you could use a pair of odd frequencied 4-way controllers. One for movement of the vehicle and the other for the pickup arm/grabber. Wait, I just googledit. "radio control modules 8-channel" has lots of hits.
Why not build your own platform, Iggy? Buy tracks and remove some links to scale it down for your size requirements. Use steppers to run them slower or gear them down. Use your CNC mill to make aluminum parts from (da ta ta daaaaah!) Billet Aluminum! Have your son program it with your instruction. This is a perfect opportunity to get him involved in your business.
Have fun!
P.S: Be sure to show pics of what you guys come up with.
Little robots for the older grandkids. I have three wheeled units them in various stages of assembly, and one on tracks.
I don't have any pics up yet, but I can direct you to parts sources. If your email address is valid, I'd be happy to send info. Drawings, schematics, code, etc.
I used a small aluminum plate for the base, geared dual motor unit for motion, a 1" dia "trackball" type nose roller, and a Propeller P8x32 processor (Quickstart board) for the brain.
QuickStart Board:
formatting link
MY code is all written in Spin, but the drivers (objects) from the Parallax Object Exchange are a combination of Spin and Assembly.
Most of my parts came from Pololu (I can't pronounce it either) and they have quite a range of robot kits.
formatting link
Remote control via universal TV remote control unit. Cheap and easy. IR remote sensor/decoder:
formatting link
formatting link
The interface circuit board is 5" diameter circle, but could be shaped any way you wanted.
formatting link
formatting link
My "Q-Bug" robots claim to fame is that they are not supposed to fall off of the table. The "floor sensors" detect if it is safe to move.
Floor sensors:
formatting link
Dual Motor Drive unit: (a bear to assemble!)
formatting link
Dual motor controller board:
formatting link
Wheels:
formatting link
Plastic Chassis:
formatting link
No servos are used so far, but I may add a Ping sensor (ultrasonic range finder) and use a very small servo to move it back and forth for scanning the area. But at the moment that looks more like a complication than a feature. The floor sensors are working fine, and that's all I wanted to do.
"Ignoramus26083" wrote in message news:I7ydnVNBPLPuqhXPnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@giganews.com...
Could you strip the components from an RC tank and assemble your own chassis from thin plywood, aluminum extrusions and press-in bushings, with a raised idler to shorten the footprint of the track?
You'd have a stronger mounting base for the claw and the freedom to redistribute the mass to counterbalance it. jsw
I have a boe-bot, it uses R/C servos that have been modified for continuous rotation for the wheel drive motors. Do you think the Tamiya tracked chassis would be easily adaptable to R/C servos? If not, it might be interesting to take the electronics out of a servo and connect to the double motor gearbox. The first servo's I worked on had wires going to the motor and pot, I reversed them myself, seems the newer stuff has the board soldered right on the motor.
Not the track chassis. I doubt those wheels could be adapted to servos all that easily. It _could_ be done, of course, but ... The wheels are special two-piece things with a gap in the center for the web on the back of the track. They ride on a solid axle - about 3/32" I think. All but the drive wheels are free-wheelers.
There is quite a bit of tension on the the wheels because of the tracks. The tracks themselves are made up from short pieces. Right out of the box they were so tight that it looked like they were going to come apart at the connections. I moved the front axle back about 3/16" to take some of that out.
RC servos would be attractive because of the simplicity of hooking up the electronics. All the "software" is in the transmitter and receiver.
Plain motors, on the other hand, need transistors for control. That means something to run the transistors... software for on/off. PWM to control speed.
I think I've got him running though. Check the web page I scraped together last night about this.
Those robots all look interesting. For future robots, also consider using 18650 type batteries instead of AA's. Two 18650 Li ion batteries take up slightly more room (about 34 cc for 2 ea 18 mm x 65 mm batteries) than four NiMH AA's (about 31 cc for 4 ea 14 mm x 50 mm batteries) but weigh less (ca 68 g vs 88 g) and and pack 50% more power (2 x 3.7 V x 2.5 Ah = 18.5 Wh, vs 4 x 1.2 V x 2.5 Ah = 12 Wh) and in simplest form cost half as much per set. (I think some versions have low voltage shutdown protection and cost more.)
The necessary charging and discharging protection circuits aren't that easy to design or test unless you have experience with battery power circuits. Lithiums are great if you can buy the controller, otherwise sealed lead-acids may be the easiest for non-EEs.
formatting link
NiCad and NiMH are harder to charge properly, but easy to find an inexpensive charger for.
Inexpensive 1-cell and 2-cell Li ion chargers are as easy to use for
18650 cells as NiMH chargers are for AA cells. See eg (or click the "18650 battery charger" link at )
If the cells are made up into a battery pack, then yes, more issues might arise. For simple robot apps, using 2 cells in series is fairly straightforward.
PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.