tap 1/2" in steel

The easiest way is to use a tap on the lathe. There is a handy little gadget called a tap guide, it is spring loaded to keep contact with the tap as you advance and comes with a point on one end and a cone on the other. The cone end is for the smaller taps. You drill your hole in the bar in the lathe, chamfer the hole(optional but it does help the tap and looks a lot better) then insert the tap guide into the drill chuck and with the tap placed up against the hole, bring the tap guide up and center the tap with the end and then move the unit forward with the tailstock handwheel. Be careful not to go to far or you could chip the teeth where it is touching the work. Tap into the work and occasionally move the quill up to keep the tension on the tap guide. There should be one in every toolbox, only about $6 from KBC or similar outlets. If you are not sure of what they look like, see
formatting link
and goto page 201, middle of the page.
Walter Harley wrote:
Reply to
Loading thread data ...
Newbie question - not a big deal, just wondering about something. I need to
tap a 1/2"-20 thread through the center of a 0.75" long mild steel cylinder
(1.25" OD).
In principle, I can do this either with a tap or with a lathe, correct? Is
one preferable to the other? What's the smallest hole you can thread with a
Reply to
Walter Harley
A tap is generally preferable, but you can do it on a lathe if you want to. The tap is a lot faster. The lathe may be less expensive if you only need to do a few and don't care to buy the tap to do them faster, and/or will enjoy the challenge of cutting them. If you're willing to grind the tools and willing to work within the limits of strength of the tools you grind, you should be able to go pretty small, but I can't say I've really experimented with how small a hole you can thread, since a tap is faster unless you cannot get a tap. Certainly 1/2" should be doable.
Reply to
Don't get fancy. Use a tap. Threading on a lathe is for cnc nerds......... it's not for average guys like you , or me. It used to be a skill for old Germans.... forget it.
Reply to
Tap is preferable if you have a suitable tap on hand. Lathe works when you don't, and perhaps one isn't even available.
Smallest hole that can be single-point threaded on a lathe depends on the machinist, the material and the threaded depth. I know I've threaded holes about 1/4" dia, and I think I've done smaller. Made the cutting tools by grinding them from broken drillbits. I have one boring bar with a 1/16" shank.
Reply to
Don Foreman
"Walter Harley" snipped-for-privacy@cafewalterNOSPAM.com
As another suggests, you can combine the two and use a tap pushed by the tailstock of a lathe. This will give a concentric thread, which will be harder to produce hand tapping in the vise. If your tap has a small 60 deg hole centered on the back end, you can fit a dead center into that (with the tap held in a tap wrench as well) to aid hand turning, and alternate torquing the ts handwheel and tap wrench ( always renewing and keeping pressure from the dead center on the tap) as you go. This can also be done under power, jogging the motor so you tap just a bit at a time. Sometimes you may want to single point some or most of the thread first (cut it with a boring bar in the lathe), then finish with a hand tap. Even if done in the vise, the tap will then follow the started single-point cut, so remain concentric to the bore.
The smallest internal thread you can do on the lathe is the same as the smallest internal thread you can do with a tap--multi point vs single point is the only difference. For me it's about 3/4 10. Frank Morrison
Reply to
Threading on a manual lathe is easy enough in general. I do it frequently -- both OD and ID. I go to my smaller CNC machine usually for metric threads, though, because they are a pain on a machine built for inch threading -- even if you have the conversion gear set.
1/2-20 should not be a real problem, as there is enough room for sufficient meat to allow threading a 0.750" long through hole. If it were 1/4-20, I could see problems with either route.
1) For a lathe, there would be little clearance for the chips, and for backing the cutting tool out, especially with a hole that deep.
2) For a tap -- I think that 0.750" length of thread would be a problem because only part of the length of thread is full thread form. The end of the tap has a taper to make it easier to start, and I'm not sure that a 1/4-20 would have sufficient full diameter thread -- so you would have to turn it around and pass the tap from the other end to enlarge the threads to full size.
However, since you are at 1/2", not the 1/4" which I first thought that I saw, you are fine either way. The 1/2" taps usually have a smaller shank than the thread root, so you can push it on through to complete the thread, even if it is not long enough in the flutes to complete the task.
I would normally use a tap for 1/2" and down, simply because the smaller tools are a bit harder to find (or make) -- especially since you need a bit longer than your 0.750" to get the cutting tip clear of the workpiece to get the whole length. (And if it were a blind hole, it is even more difficult.
I *do* have an insert threading tool which will work down to a 10-32 thread, but that I probably would not use except in the CNC machine, as there is very little clearance for what you need to do.
However, here, I would suggest that the threading on the lathe could be considered a learning experience, even if you would not do it that way most of the time. Sometimes you will wind up needing to cut an uncommon thread, and can't wait for a special tap to arrive from whoever you mail-order from. Or -- the special tap may be more expensive than it is worth for a single threaded hole.
But have a 1/2-20 tap on hand anyway -- since the first time or two you might have problems hitting the thread size right, and you can finish the task with the tap much easier than you can re-chuck and re-align the workpiece to open the threads up a bit if too tight. (If you have something to test the thread before removing it from the lathe chuck, that is a different matter.
Enjoy, DoN.
Reply to
DoN. Nichols
LOL. Me thinks the man doth protesteth too much!
Reply to
jim rozen
Another great sourc for tapping small holes is broken taps. The cutting point is all done for you and the angles are perfect. Just grind away all the interfearing other points.
Reply to
Karl Townsend
If you want CONCENTRIC STRAIGHT threads, then use the lathe. You will find it difficult to hold a 3/4 in piece of steel in anything where the outside doesn't slip and scar when running a 1/2 inch tap. Even if you finish the tapped hole with a tap, starting the tapping procedure with a lathe will remove material without the gigantic stress load of the tap. AND use a SHARP GOOD QUALITY (meaning not Harbor freight Chinese grade) tap in any case...especially if you don't pre-thread on the lathe. But for concentric, straight threads, use the lathe. For a higher probability of correct thread form use the tap.
Reply to
In my mind, the most despicable of all men are those that try to discourage others from gaining a skill they don't have, BUT CAN DEFINITELY LEARN. IN this particular instance, nothing was mentioned about precision threading, and for 1/2"-20, I would also do it in the lathe with a tap. However, were I lacking the tap, I would do as I have for others, including down to 1/4"-32, that is single point it. Threading isn't something for old germans, it used to be something, as little as 20 years ago, that an apprentice was expected to master quickly.
It would be interesting to hear how the one that made these obviously ignorant statements would handle a 1 1/2"-2.5 double lead internal left hand acme thread, and I would also love to be his tool supplier.
Ignorance is expensive.
Ummm, yes. I've cut that thread, and didn't take a week to do it either, more like an hour. The next four pieces went a lot quicker. The first always takes longer.
Reply to
Hmmm... Yes, no, and maybe! I have a 1/2-20 tap.... that is what I'd use in the lathe.
If I had a bunch of these to do, I'd BUY a tap....
But if I only had one to do and had no tap, I would consider chasing the thread in the lathe.
There really isn't one too small, though grinding the tool might become prohibitive for very small (common) threads (just buy a tap and get it over with)..... as Larry the Cable Guy would say, "Get 'er done."
IMHO, the decision on how to accomplish this task would be built around these questions:
-how many holes do I need to thread? -do I have the tooling, now? -how much will tooling cost? -how long will it take to get the tooling? -how quickly do I have to get this done?
Reply to
Gene Kearns
FWIW, threading is taught in the first quarter of the lathe class at the technical college where I'm taking evening machining classes; you have to cut an internal and an external thread before you pass the class (basically the class consists of making a big bolt and matching nut).
Only reasons I don't know how to do it, at least at a rudimentary level, are (1) I'm taking the milling class rather than the lathe class, and (2) my home lathe is a Sherline without a threading attachment.
Reply to
Walter Harley
You seem to have confused "chasing" a thread on a lathe with cutting a thread on a lathe. Two different processes. The former is indeed a high-skill and largely out of date (e.g., for old Germans, Swiss, Norwegians, and Americans). The latter is a basic, not very difficult skill to master in Lathework 101. In cutting a lathe thread on a lathe you must have a screw-cutting capability -- that means, a lead screw and appropriate gearing -- whether a built-in "quick change" gear box or separate gears that you have to change for each pitch. Alternatively, a lathe with some kind of CNC control for cutting threads. The key is that the tool is a single-point cutting tool. "Chasing" a thread is an altogether different (and largely obsolete) skill. In chasing, you use a multi-point tool. Sort of looks like a lathe tool with saw teeth on the end. The spacing of the teeth determines the pitch of the screw. You place the chasing tool against the work while the work is turning, at the same time moving the tool toward the headstock. If you do it just right, you'll find yourself cutting a screw thread. That's a shallow, starting thread. Then you have to push the tool in successively farther until you get the thread depth you want. Since it takes several passes, you have to "chase" the thread with the tool to line it up for the next cut. With luck, you should be able to get a decent thread after a few hundred tries. Now for an inside thread (eg., a nut) you do the same, only this time you can't really see the thread you're trying to cut ..a few years and a few thousand attempts should bring it home. Any one who is serious about machining should try (and succeed in) chasing an external thread at least once in his life -- makes you appreciate tools like taps and dies. As much as possible I do all my threading and tapping on lathe -- using taps and dies. For tapping you use a spring-mounted point tool to hold the tap against the work with the right pressure. Assures a perfect allignment almost always. For threading, I made up similar, sprint-loaded, die holders. Over the years, I've accumulated a very big assortment of weird taps and dies but every once in a while, especially when helping a friend restore an antique instrument, you come across threads that follow no recognizable standard. Then you have to do it on the lathe. For threading, it isn't much of a hassle. But if you have to tap a weird thread in a small hole and can't just fake it by using a heli-coil, then it is worth making your own tap. Not that big a deal. Although I have a bunch of very big taps and dies (up to 1.5 x 8) I usually start by cutting big threads on the lathe, and then finish them off and clean up using the tap or die as appropriate. It's a lot easier doing it that way than getting a die lined up correctly .. Also a lot less brute force needed. I doubt if there's more than a dozen denizens of this news group who can consistently chase decent threads -- I'm not one of them. As for threading on a lathe without using taps and dies, I'd guess that its a basic skill mastered by more than 95% of this NG.
------------------------------------- Boris Beizer Ph.D. Seminars and Consulting 1232 Glenbrook Road on Software Testing and Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006 Quality Assurance
TEL: 215-572-5580 FAX: 215-886-0144 Email bsquare "at" sprintmail.com ------------------------------------------
Reply to
Boris Beizer
I am not slamming those that don't know how, for many that have access only to lathes that do not have threading capability, it's totally understandable. I am slamming the attitude that it is something that is too difficult to be learned. Threading, like any other machining operation, is a series of simple steps, that can only be taken one at a time. It's a process, not a magical incantation, there's no wizardry involved, and anyone that can do basic turning and boring can learn it easily.
Whoever posts under "larson" or what ever name this hacker uses is not a machinist, not even a good apprentice, but a butcher of metal. During all of my years in machining, over forty, every competent man that I met or worked with would learn all he could, if for no other reason than it was something else he knew and nobody could ever take that away from him. To discourage someone from trying anything that is well within the possible, and not even in the difficult, is despicable.
Reply to
Why wouldn't you just put the tap in the tailstock chuck, turn the lathe on slow and feed the tap in by pushing the tailstock forward without clamping it? Been doing that for over 40 years and I guess that's why I never understood why anyone would buy tap guide. Leigh at MarMachine
Reply to
Leigh Knudson
"Boris Beizer" snipped-for-privacy@sprintmail.com
wrt chasing a thread
It may have been easier in wrought iron. I can't see even trying it on modern steel. The method does survive for turning wood threads. I have a few of the old hand tools, but have not had the urge to press them against substance yet. Frank Morrison
Reply to
You have a point there. I urged people to try this technique just for the experience, but... My first attempt was on a 3/8 aluminum rod. After butchering a foot or two of this material, I switched to 1/4" brass. Never did try steel. Obviously, you do this at the slowest speed, using the back gear. I once saw a 90 year old something watchmaker who could zip out watch screws about as fast as it would take using a die .. note, mostly left-handed threads. This makes we wonder if the prevalence of left-hand threads in Germany and Switzerland hs to do with the fact that it much easier to chase a left-hand thread on a screw than a right-hand thread.
Reply to
Boris Beizer
Chasing survived in the US late into the last century, by hobbyists involved in optics. The special, large-diameter, fine-pitch threads used in making telescopes are all but impossible to make any other way on a home-shop lathe. And you probably will wind up taking your outside-threading chaser and bending the end over to make your internal threading tool. It can be hard to get the pitch exactly right on two different tools, although the real experts seem to do it Ok.
Several old guys who were members of an astromony club nearby were experts at it. My uncle, who taught shop in the school in that town and who knew all those old guys, picked it up and became quite good at it himself. He taught me, and I was able to chase good threads after relatively few tries. A key to it is to have a very smooth top surface on your follow rest (which looks like the follow rest on a woodworking lathe, except that it clamps onto your compound). I polished mine and stoned the burrs off with an Arkansas stone.
Since I never picked up much interest in making telescopes, I lost the skill over the years. But it's really not as difficult as it sounds. While you're learning, you do tend to make double-start threads at twice the pitch you intended , but you get past that.
BTW, most of those optical-equipment threads were cut in brass, but I've done it in steel with no problem.
Ed Huntress
Reply to
Ed Huntress
Walter .....(My thoughts on driving a 1/2" tap using a Sherline with only a 1/4" tailstock chuck)
You could lock the lathe spindle (or hold it), hold the part in the chuck then keep the tap on line by pushing on it with a dead centre in the tailstock and turn the tap with an open end wrench or visegrips.
Even then I don't know if the lathe has the strength to keep the tap in place while you'er trying to turn the tap by hand.
Bill D (O:
Reply to
Bill Darby

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.