Anyone know if it's an electronic oscillator with no air being passed through it or does it use a pressurized air stream? It's my understanding that a brass instrument doesn't HAVE to have air blown through it to work, that just happens to be the only way for a human to create the necessary vibrations.
Mechanism behind trumpet playing robot?
Dec 22, 2007
60 Replies
formatting link
It sounds synthesized to me. Are you sure "he" is actually playing the horn? Randy
I had the opposite feeling. It looks like he (it) is blowing air through it, and pressing keys on a real horn. With the polymers available these days it would be quite easy to make the proper interface to the horn's mouthpiece (along with the vibrations our lips make when we do it), and the programming to press the keys/buttons on the horn is trivial.
I'm pretty sure he is. I think the "synthness" you're hearing is the fact that you've never heard a trumpet played without the "flaws" inherent with the way humans generate tones on a brass instrument. The articulations, the vibrato.
Could be. Maybe a bad recording too? Randy
The University of Edinburgh made a set of artificial lips for experimenting with trombone design. It was two lengths of rubber tube with pressurised water in them. Increasing or decreasing the pressure changed the note. Air was blown through these lips to make the buzz
Someone got a PHd out of the project:
formatting link
And here is her entire doctoral thesis:
formatting link
can see the apparatus in various pictures within it.
I wonder how big Mikey's doctoral thesis is? Can we read it online?
On a sunny day (Sat, 22 Dec 2007 21:25:36 -0000) it happened "Gordon Hudson" wrote in :
I have played trumpet once upon a time, but my ears did not get blue. I did almost pass out once however, as it took all oxygen from my head....
I waited until the end of the movie to see if it would take the trumpet down, so I could see the 'lips'. Unfortunately not. For the rest it is pretty good:-) And it likely does not spit so much as we do :-) Could add that as a feature though!
The spit.
I have to vote for the synthetic lips.
I was waiting for the robot to wave the other hand while playing!
Angelo Campanella
Pretty damn cool document!
Before I even started the video I was saying that I bet the robot was big enough to contain an actual person.
It was
d--Obliquely of interest: here's a wind-instrument player a friend of mine made many moons ago:
formatting link
The air doesn't make the sound, the trumpet player's lips have to vibrate, similar to a reed instrument - the trumpet tunes the vibrating column of air and couples it, via the horn, to the environment. Lips/breath are excitation, length of pipe is the tuned circuit, horn is the impedance matching element.
Now getting a robot to do it? A trumpet player starts the note by pressurizing the mouth, tensing the lips, then suddenly removing the tongue to start the note - similar to spitting material off the tip of one's tongue.
Without those elements it is bound to sound different even if a robot is producing the sound by blowing air into the instrument. - the cheap easy way would be to add a reed to the mouthpiece and that would make it sound more like an alto sax?
I do know for a fact that there's a church in NYC that has a few dozen trumpet - bugle pipes (one for each note) on the pipe organ and it does sound like a trumpet so there must be an organ maker that knows how to do it. Strictly speaking, it wouldn't be a trumpet any more if it had a reed in it.
Lip tension and pressure will get four notes per valve or combination of valves - 4 solid notes; with good players able to hit several higher notes per valving. A bugle is basically a four note instrument, a valve bugle is an eight note instrument.
Not if you examine the joints on his limbs. There is no way a person could be in there.
There is a big difference between blowing air across an opening, such as that used in a flute, and blowing reverberated air through a horn's mouthpiece.
Both the flute, and woodwind instruments would be far easier to construct and perform upon than those of the horn section.
This is Usenet, not email, try to refrain from top posting.
Bullshit. They do not need their tongue at all.
If you had any brains, you could tell by the sound that it was a horn sound, and that there was no reed involved in making the reverberations.
Why would you make a remark as if fact, then finish it with a question mark?
Except that it wasn't a bugle, it was a trumpet.
I did. Plenty of room.
dJoin the Discussion
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Didn't find your answer?
Ask the community — no account required