Robot Batteries: What to use?

Hello Group,

Over the past few days, I've been looking at the various battery technologies for robotics use. The specifications that I am working with is a 24v rail with moderate to heavy pulsed current draw. I've written up a table below of my perceptions of the different types. I'm leaning toward either NiCd or NiMH, but the cost of NiMH is prohibitive with the higher capacity cells. I would love to use a size F cell with a capacity of 12-15 amp-hours, but at about USD$25.00 per cell on average, buying 20 of them gets to be real expensive. So my question is what are you using?

Lead Acid:

Nominal cell voltage 2 volts. Comes in 6 volt or 12 volt packages. Requires 2-12 volt or 4-6 volt batteries to make the 24 volt requirement.

Pros: Charge/discharge characteristics are well known. Cost is cheap. Can supply high current. Deep Cycle versions. Maintenance free and Sealed versions.

Cons: Large and heavy. Toxic (Lead, Antimony, Sulfuric Acid). Liquid Electrolyte (Except gel-cells). Construction is application specific (Car batteries cannot be deep-cycled, deep cycle cannot support high current pulses).

Nickel-Cadmium:

One of the oldest rechargeable battery technologies. Nominal cell voltage 1.2 volts. Requires 20 cells to make the 24 volt requirement.

Pros: Charge/discharge characteristics are well known. Cost is cheap. Simple charging circuit.

Cons: Requires periodic deep discharge. Toxic materials (Cadmium) Do not handle high current loads very well. Low energy density. Can develop memory effect. Requires overnight charging.

Nickel-Metal Hydride:

Nominal cell voltage 1.2 volts. Requires 20 cells to make the 24 volt requirement.

Pros: Charge/discharge characteristics are well known (Similar to NiCd). Higher capacity (F size cells can be 15Ah) Can support high discharge rates. Can use NiCd charging circuit. Non-toxic. Can be fast charged.

Cons: Higher capacity cells are expensive. Can develop memory effect. Cannot be deep discharged. Can overheat on high draws. High temperature will significantly shorten service life.

Lithium-Ion (Standard):

Nominal cell voltage 3.6 volts. Does not evenly divide into 24 volts. Closest is 6 cells (Lower than spec) or 7 cells (Higher than spec).

Pros: Highest energy density of any technology available. Can support high current loads.

Cons (** SAFETY ALERT **): Requires special charger. Requires over-charge/over-discharge protection circuit. Requires cell balancer for optimum performance. Will not tolerate electrical or physical abuse. Will not tolerate high temperatures. Will vent, flame out, or explode when abused. Drawing too much current will cause the cell to vent, flame out, or explode.

Cons: Expensive.

Lithium-Ion (A123 Systems):

Nominal cell voltage 3.3 volts. Does not evenly divide into 24 volts. Closest is 7 cells (Lower than spec) or 8 cells (Higher than spec).

Pros: High energy density. Can support high current loads. Does not have the safety issues of standard Li-Ion batteries. They do not blow up.

Cons: Expensive. Not available to general public. Requires special charger. Requires over-charge/over-discharge protection circuit. Requires cell balancer for optimum performance. (?) Will not tolerate electrical or physical abuse. (?) Will not tolerate high temperatures.

Reply to
Daniel Rudy
Loading thread data ...

Have you looked at the Cyclon lead acids? Not a lot of amp hours but half a dozen of the D size will start a car.

Reply to
Robin

I disagree on the high current loads, NiCads handle high current loads just fine. They also can be fast charged.

BobH

Reply to
BobH

I see what you mean.

formatting link
It seems these were designed for that type of use. Sintered cadmium electrode?

Reply to
Daniel Rudy

What do you mean by "heavy pulsed current draw"? You need to put numbers on all these things.

Incidentally, if you don't have numbers, I recommend getting a clamp-around DC ammeter (yes, these exist, and cost about $100) and finding out. I've found that to be a very useful instrument in robotics work.

John Nagle

Reply to
John Nagle

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.