Interference.

I,m flying a Tucano with a brushless motor all the proper set up from Puffin
Models now and again I get what seems like interference, i've never had it
with IC,can anyone help.
Alan.
Reply to
Alan Sarll
Loading thread data ...
"now and again I get what seems like interference"
With that thorough explanation of the problem, specific description of the configuration components, and what you have already tried to resolve the issue, it should be easy for others to offer a solution.
Reply to
aeropal
A rather obvious thing that some people miss is the placement of the RX to the motor and ESC. Get that RX as far away from the motor and ESC as possible.
Reply to
The Raven
why don't you cut the guy some slack - all he did was ask a question. Why did you have to bring sarcasm into it? He did say he thought the setup was good, so obviously he wants to look in other places. You could have at least suggested something -
Reply to
zara
Details of what "interference" from the original poster would have been nice! A little more specific is good!
Reply to
JACK
His question was like asking "What's wrong with my car" without any details. It is impossible to give any kind of meaningful respose without SOME indication of the setup and problem description.
Reply to
Paul McIntosh
"why don't you cut the guy some slack - all he did was ask a question. Why did you have to bring sarcasm into it? He did say he thought the setup was good, so obviously he wants to look in other places. You could have at least suggested something - "
Zara,
My plane won't fly. Any suggestions?
;)
Chris
Reply to
Hal
Yeah - go fuck yourself.
Reply to
zara
Hey! No need for the foul language! Could get yerself plonked or kill filed for it!
Reply to
JACK
You know JACK, you have a point. The problem with this group is that there are a lot of Peckerheads here. Instead of trying to give a hand, they jump in with uncalled for bullshit,---- Give out uncalled for personal attacks, and smartass remarks, instead of sharing camaraderie. Why the dick asked me what he should do because his plane wouldn't fly puzzles me. What did I do to him anyway? I like it here, lots of Peckerheads to troll.
Reply to
zara
Q.E.D.
Reply to
St. John Smythe
Well,! Let's keep it clean in here! No personal attacks!
Reply to
JACK
| You know JACK, you have a point. The problem with this group is that there | are a lot of Peckerheads here. Instead of trying to give a hand, they jump | in with uncalled for bullshit,---- Give out uncalled for personal attacks, | and smartass remarks,
Odd. I thought you were the person who said `go fuck yourself'. Seems strange for somebody to complain about `uncalled for personal attacks and smartass remarks' when they tell soembody else to `go fuck themselves'. Perhaps I misread ... I'll have to go back and check and see if it was somebody else who said that.
| instead of sharing camaraderie. Why the dick asked me | what he should do because his plane wouldn't fly puzzles me.
He was trying to make a point. A valid point, I might add. It would have appeared to have gone over your head.
Saying `I have interference' is only one tiny bit better than `My plane won't fly'.
Sure, people could be nicer and more helpful here, but hey, this is Usenet, which is filled with real people, who aren't always nice and helpful. If you don't like it, I'm not sure what you can do about it, beyond being nice and helpful yourself and many people will respond in kind. So far, you're not doing that, so I find it difficult to feel much sympathy for you. If you don't like it here, leave. Either that, or try to be a role model for how you think people should behave.
| What did I do to him anyway?
You played `holier than thou'. Simple enough.
| I like it here, lots of Peckerheads to troll.
So far, you're not really doing a very good job of trolling. And if you think you are, you must not really think that trolling means the same thing as everybody else does or something.
| >>> "why don't you cut the guy some slack - all he did was ask a | >>> question. Why did you have to bring sarcasm into it? He did | >>> say he thought the setup was good, so obviously he wants to look | >>> in other places. You could have at least suggested something -"
Odd. I missed it where you suggested anything, beyond `go fuck yourselves'.
The person you're responding to, on the other hand, suggested that he give more information. THAT is a far more useful suggestion.
Without more information, any suggestions made would just be guesses. I could make some guesses, if you think that would help?
-- replace all your radio gear -- move out of the city -- change channels -- route your antenna away from metal -- make sure your plane doesn't have any metal touching metal -- did you remember to sacrifice a virgin to the RFI gods?
I don't think those are very useful at this point, but whatever works.
Reply to
Doug McLaren
Doug,
Very well put. I doubt I would have spent so much energy on that peckerhead!
Reply to
Paul McIntosh
So you thought his remark was called for? Try to remember that my inital post only said, that he should be given some slack, thats all. But some here have taken offense at that.
His "point" was sarcastic. You know it, I know it, and he knows it. Or perhaps you think I took it wrong.
He stated that he felt the radio gear was installed properly. How many other solutions could there possibly be?
Yeah, some here are nice and others are scumbags.
So far, you're not doing that, so I find it difficult to feel
I don't need sympathy. And I don't need some jerk hiding behind a keyboard (and I don't mean you) breaking my balls because he dosen't like an innocent remark. And I'm definitly not leaving.
No I did not. I only said to cut the guy some slack.
I'm not trolling - only responding to some of the Peckerheads - the ones who personally attack, because the poor baby's resent what I have to say. Go back to my post on the tri-county-eagles, and see how they crawled out of the woodwork. Some resented that I mentioned a dangerous condition - even implied that I was "overreacting" or was wrong in some way.
Odd, I missed where anyone here made even one suggestion. You all jumped on him - like flies on shit. Real holier than thou bullshit.
Bullshit answer.
Another Bullshit answer.
Worth a try
Worth a try.
Worth a try
Another Bullshit answer.
Well maybe one of the three legitimate ones you suggested worked - Maybe he's getting interference from a source at his field.
Reply to
zara
21 Posts and noone even attempted to answer the original question.
Reply to
Smeghead
Well, I will say that maybe by chance he's got a hitec feather RX which I've had interference with too. Maybe he needs a different RX. But he didn't give many details. I think we might should coaxed a bit more info out of 'em in order to help 'em or we could have typed every possible reason for interference(impossible). I must admit that I've posted what's in my head, which wasn't enough info, and it took replies to get me to realize this. mk
and you didn't either. mk
Reply to
MK
A response from the original poster (Alan Sarll) in ANOTHER thread:
"Thank's for all your suggestions, changing chanels seem's to have worked. It may have been saboutage."
formatting link
Reply to
aeropal
you were a real big help.
Reply to
zara
| 21 Posts and noone even attempted to answer the original question.
... including your post.
In any event, which question? This one?
I,m flying a Tucano with a brushless motor all the proper set up from Puffin Models now and again I get what seems like interference, i've never had it with IC,can anyone help.
I guess the actual question was `can anyone help' (there's no question mark, but it's still obviously a question), and so I guess the proper answer would be `yes, somebody might be able to help, if you gave more details.' From what I can see, the second post (and a few others) basically said just that.
Unfortunately, this newsgroup is somewhat short on mind readers (alt.paranormal is over there ----> ), so we generally need to be given a certain amount of information to give a useful answer.
In any event, I see that he was able to resolve the problem by switching channels. I'm glad to hear that. A previous post of mine in the thread did suggest exactly that, but since I was lacking any sort of details, it was just one of many random ways of resolving interference issues that I threw out. (But I guess you didn't think my post attempted to answer the question either.)
But hey, if you don't like the help desk service you receive from rec.models.rc.air, I do believe we offer a `double your money back' guarantee. Note that this only applies to money paid directly to rec.models.rc.air, not to your ISP or Usenet provider, and not to any individual members -- you'd have to negotiate a refund with them directly.
Reply to
Doug McLaren

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.