Parametric Bike Chainring Designed in FreeCAD, Machined in 7075

Nov 12, 2026 Last reply: 4 hours ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The hardest hurdle arrived right at the start: the first prototype off the FDM machine came out wafer thin, weak and warped, a white plastic test piece that plainly would not last. Rather than keep wrestling with filament, the maker, Deltahedra, changed course, sent the STEP file to PCBWay for stereolithography, and finally had the part CNC machined from 7075 aluminum alloy. That path from a failed print to a metal component is what makes this project worth studying.



The geometry was worked out in FreeCAD version 0.21 across five successive models, with the design broken into three parametric stages. Sizing came from the pitch circle diameter formula, matched to a chain pitch of 12.7 mm, and the mounting layout follows the 104 mm bolt circle standard with an 88 mm inner register. Digital calipers and a kitchen scale were both part of the measuring work.



Several details stand out. The model is parametrically adjustable from 40 to 50 teeth, so one file covers a wide spread of gearing. The finished ring came in at 97 grams, comfortably under the 100 to 110 gram target. It was gold anodized with chamfered edge accents, and in the real-world functional test it spun smoothly, with the tooth profile and structural rigidity handling dynamic forces well.



One piece stays open: the honeycomb pockets. How those were machined, and with what tooling, has not been laid out yet, and that seems like the most interesting remaining chapter for anyone hoping to repeat this build.



Project by Deltahedra. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Splitting the model into three parametric stages looks like the sharpest choice here to me. With the tooth count adjustable from 40 to 50, a staged structure should make revisions far less painful than wrestling one monolithic sketch. The cost is extra planning before any geometry exists, but for a part that has to survive dynamic forces, that trade seems worth taking.

Question on the geometry side: when the pitch circle diameter formula was applied, was it tied into the parametric stages so the diameter recalculated with each tooth change, or were the values worked out once and entered by hand? I am curious how the 12.7 mm pitch flows into the final tooth positions across that 40 to 50 range.

Since the design stretches from 40 to 50 teeth, a 50 tooth version would be a natural next step. It would show whether the 97 gram result still holds at the top of the range, and whether the honeycomb pockets keep the ring stiff there. Another resin prototype with thicker sections could also test whether the early warping trouble was avoidable.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required