| I have a closed-loop system which is composed of PI controller and
| plant. I don't know the model of plant, but I can online get the
| closed-loop dominant poles.
| I want to online tuning PI controller parameters, I don't know how to
| tuning controller parameters by closed-loop dominant poles.
| good luck and thanks!
You have two unknowns and one known. That isn't enough. Normally one has a
plant model and a desired response and then calculates the controller gains.
BTW, what makes you so sure that the controller needs to be a PI controller
if you don't know the plant model.
He should have one known for each pole location, which makes one known
point for each plant state plus one for the integrator. If he knows the
PI gains he should, in theory at least, be able to derive the system
polynomial for the closed-loop system and from there get to the system
polynomial for the open-loop system.
It's terribly round about, though.
Yes, but you are assuming that forest knows that. I am not making
that assumption. He could have told us what the transfer function was
if he knew. How often have you see people use the wrong number of
gains? Too often. Many people people don't understand what you just
said and why it is so.
Any method that you would use to get the pole locations should be able
to give you a more direct measurement of the plant transfer function.
Either ARMA methods (say with a step disturbance input) or frequency
sweep methods (which I prefer, and have detailed both on my website and
in my book*) can give you a plant model, even when you're in
closed-loop. Why, then, do you want to mess around with such indirect data?
The article is
The book is "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems", by me,
published by Elsevier.
http://www.powells.com/partner/30696/s?kw=Wescott+Tim will buy you a
will get you the publisher's description.
* I would have liked to include a section on determining plant transfer
functions using ARMA methods, but I was running out of time to have the
book published this year -- I hope to have an article at some point;
should the book go to a 2nd edition the article will make it's way into
the measurement chapter.
thanks for your good ideas!
I don't know plant model, so I can't design other controller.
Therefore I only use PI controller.
I know closed-loop dominant poles. It is equivalent that I get the
reduced-order model of closed-loop. I think it's wrong that derived
plant model from reduced close-loop model and controller, so I can't
archive plant model.
This is not a practical problem. I only do a research. So I don't
identify plant model.
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.