Hi, Yes. There usually, but not always, is a tech review of proposed manuscripts.
[-Rick-]
Hi, Yes. There usually, but not always, is a tech review of proposed manuscripts.
[-Rick-]
Rick, you're talking to the (or at least one of) my copy editor(s).
Lewin -- did you go over all the math, then?
Hi Tim, Ah ha. Interesting.
The reason I said there is "usually" a technical review is because the last technical book that I bought contained SOOooo many technical errors that it's clear that no tech review was performed. None!
The typical tech book has a silly little "typo" or misspelled word once every 20-30 pages. The book I bought had an average of more than one "typo" per page!! I am NOT joking. (One page contained four "typos"!!)
What an unprofessional mess by both the authors and the Publisher.
[-Rick-]
Name them, or at least the publisher. It might induce them to shape up.
Jerry
Hi Jer,
I knew what I'd written probably sounded very mysterious by my not giving any specifics.
I didn't give the book's title, right now, for legal reasons.
However, the publisher was SAMS Publishing (Indianapolis, Indiana). I will *NEVER* buy a SAMS book, sigh unseen, again.
[-Rick-]
I've known that rule for almost 20 years and even back then it was common knowledge. I also don't buy SAMS and never have.
Jon
Hi,
Well Jon, you're a much faster "learner" than I am.
Regards, [-Rick-]
There was a time when looking for a intro to something new I'd give preference to a SAMS book. Not since the early 70's though. Hmmm, did they get bought out in late 60's/early 70's?
Its been sold quite a few times since 1967.
Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.
Ask the community — no account required