I have a reasonably modern charger (a few months old) and some old
rechargeable cells (about 5 years old). Is it wise to use the two
The charger is specified to give a charge rate of 350 mA.
I think the charge voltage is 2.8 V per pair of cells.
The charger has a "negative-delta-V" sensor.
The AAA cells are NiMH and are each rated as holding 0.185 mAh.
(Q.1) Will this 350 mA *RATE* of charge be too much for such
cells to take resulting in noticeable adverse effects?
Assuming the charge in the cells is fully depleted and assuming
that the charge is taken up in a linear way, then the figures
suggest a maximum charge time of 30 minutes.
(Q.2) Is it highly likely that the "negative-delta-V" will be
sensed only after the cells have gone into overcharge (venting gas
and messing up who-knows-what internally)?
major in electrical engineering, freelance electrician
FH von Iraklion-Kreta, freiberuflicher Elektriker
dimtzort AT otenet DOT gr
Ï "Alex Coleman" Ýãñáøå óôï ìÞíõìá
All cells have printed on them "suggested charging current is X:mA"Check if
that's under 350 mA, which should be.
Only with a 100% efficiency, which is impossible.It would be more realistic
if you assumed a 50% efficiency.
What do you mean venting gas?Modern NiCd cells are supposed to be sealed,
aren't they?I've never heard before of a negative delta V sensor.
The 2.8V is a nominal number that is loosely related to actual.
A more useful number would be the overvoltage termination number.
negative-delta-V will overcharge NiMH.
You sure about that? VERY old NiCd cells may have been that low.
Assuming you really meant 185mAH. I don't recall seeing a AAA NiMH
much below 500mAH.
Probably, but more important is the charge termination method.
You can buy 8.5 minute charge cells these days.
This is a risky assumption. Cells are rarely fully depleted
in actual use. Sooner or later, you're gonna stuff mostly
charged cells in the charger. The 2.8V number implies that two
cells are charged in series. Things get really bursty
when you stuff in one fully charged and one depleted cell.
No matter how determined you are, you'll do it eventually.
Ask me how I know ;-)
Need to be certain of the cell capacity numbers before drawing any
conclusions. It certainly is possible to charge cells so fast
that they vent before they even get warm.
| > The charger is specified to give a charge rate of 350 mA.
| > I think the charge voltage is 2.8 V per pair of cells.
| The 2.8V is a nominal number that is loosely related to actual.
| A more useful number would be the overvoltage termination number.
What is this `overvoltage termination number' you speak of?
You can't determine that a NiCd or NiMH cell is fully charged or not
only based on a single instantaneous voltage reading -- you just can't
say `oh, it reads 1.42 volts -- it's fully charged now!'
(That does work on LiPo and Pb cells, however.)
| > The charger has a "negative-delta-V" sensor.
| negative-delta-V will overcharge NiMH.
If it does, it's only by a small amount, if done properly. NiMH cells
do have a negative voltage peak just like NiCd cells do, but it's
smaller, so older chargers that look for a larger peak can often miss
it, and then THAT will overcharge your NiMH cell. But
`negative-delta-V' _does_ work properly on NiMH if it's sensitive
(And as a rule of thumb, the older a charger is, the less likely it is
to be sensitive enough, since they started making them more sensitive
to handle NiMH cells when NiMH cells started becoming popular. Of
course, being _too_ sensitive is a bad thing too, as it can cause
| > The AAA cells are NiMH and are each rated as holding 0.185 mAh.
| You sure about that? VERY old NiCd cells may have been that low.
| Assuming you really meant 185mAH. I don't recall seeing a AAA NiMH
| much below 500mAH.
First of all, his units are obviously wrong. It might be 185 mAh or
0.185 Ah, but not 0.185 mAh (which would be off by a factor of 1000.)
But you're right -- I've never seen AAA NiMH cells that small, and the
smallest AAA NiCd cells I've seen in a while have been about 250 mAh.
Note that in most cases you should not charge NiMH cells at over 1 C.
So if your cells really are 185 mAh, they should not be charged at
over 185 mA.
(Exceptions include sub-C cells, which can be charged at 2C safely,
and then there's the new NiMH cells which say they can be charged in
15 minutes or even faster, which would be 4C or more, but I've never
used those new cells myself.)
Is it possible that you've got AA (not AAA) cells, 1850 mAh capacity,
and the charge rate suggested on the package is 0.185 mA for 12-14
hours or so? That would make a lot more sense.
| > (Q.1) Will this 350 mA *RATE* of charge be too much for such
| > cells to take resulting in noticeable adverse effects?
| Probably, but more important is the charge termination method.
Both are pretty important, actually. 350 mA would cook 180 mAh NiMH
cells pretty quickly, for example. They might tolerate it for a few
charges, but they wouldn't last long. (And overcharging at 350 mA
The overvoltage termination is somewhere around 1.6V/cell.
It's intended as a fail-safe to reduce the number of exploded cells
when something goes horribly wrong in the charging process.
Same reason there's also a timer to shut off charging after 1.5C or so.