On 14 Feb 2026, NoBody snipped-for-privacy@nowhere.com posted some news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:
>‘Catastrophic failure’ of transformer at Waratah Super Battery, Australia’s ‘giant shock-absorber’ for the grid
>>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> His cite was that in 2024, renewables were less than 50%.
>>>>>>>>>>>> My cite was that in 2025, renewables were now more than >>>>>>>>>>>> 50%.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Socialism can't bring himself to admit that newer data
>>>>>>>>>>>> supersedes his older data.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I've seen no fuel mix data for Western Australia for 2025
>>>>>>>>>>> that says renewable and solar are the primary source. >>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Correct, because what I cited reported just that renewables
>>>>>>>>>> were 52%, not the entire breakdown.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <LOL> I've seen no fuel mix data for Western Australia for
>>>>>>>>> 2025 that says renewables are 52% of the sources for electric
>>>>>>>>> generation....
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Translation:
>>>>>>>> "Not seen" because they chose to not read the citations. >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your own cite:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The NEM does not include Western Australia or the Northern
>>>>>>> Territory. Western Australia also recorded higher renewable use
>>>>>>> and declines in fossil fuel use, even as the state extended the
>>>>>>> life of a coal plant over longer-term energy security worries.
>>>>>>> Origin Energy (ORG.AX), opens new tab announced an extension of
>>>>>>> a coal plant the same week."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I never claimed that Australia as a whole was majority renewable,
>>>>>> so all you're doing is trying to move the goalposts to be
>>>>>> continent-wide.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LAUGHTER!
>>>>>
>>>>> You most certainly implied that.
>>>>
>>>> Original statement:
>>>>
>>>> "Oh, so hitting 52% on the Western Australia grid was impossible?" >>>>
>>>> Showing that from the start, it was clearly not continent-wide. >>>>
>>>> And further reinforced with:
>>>>
>>>> "I mentioned Western Australia, the world's largest isolated grid.
>>>> Because in 2025, their electricity generation from renewables
>>>> exceeded the 50% mark.
>>>>
>>>> Need a cite? Here ya go:
>>>>formatting link">>>>
>>>> Keep losing!
>>>>
>>>>>> The problem you have with that strategy is that on a
>>>>>> continent-wide basis, Australia is currently within roughly 1% of
>>>>>> being 50/50 renewables and fossil fuels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Except that it's not through ALL of Australia.
>>>>>
>>>>> LAUGHTER!
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The ramifications are that if their double-digit growth in
>>>>>> renewables deployment continues through 2026 as planned, the
>>>>>> entire continent's electrical grid will be majority renewables
>>>>>> within the next few months.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Care to bet against that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Get your numbers in order and accurate so the discussion can >>>>> continue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And that's a "no" from Nobody. Coward in real life, as usual. >>>>
>>>
>>> Your numbers for the nation are where again? Instead of getting
>>> them, you doubled down on stupid.
>>
>>
>>Here's the cite again:
>>
>>formatting link>d&view=discrete-time&group=Renewables%2FFossils>
>>
>>Today's rolling 30 day average is 50.7% FF's / 49.3% renewables, which
>>is once again within 1% of 50/50 parity.
>>
>>So as noted above:
>>
>>"The ramifications are that if their double-digit growth in renewables
>>deployment continues through 2026 as planned, the entire continent's
>>electrical grid will be majority renewables within the next few >>months.
>>
>>Care to bet against that?"
>>
>
> So where does it say that it covers all of Australia?
formatting link
Oops.>
>>-hh
>