I've noticed that when 120V 20A AC circuits are heavily loaded, the
voltage at their outlets drop somewhat. I thought that in a parallel
AC circuit, voltage remained constant but current changed. What is
going on? Can someone point to a detailed discussion of this
phenomenon (either in print or on the Web)? Thanks in advance.
--
Jack

When current flows in a wire there is resistance due to the
flow, when there is no current flowing there is no resistance.
With no resistance you read the full line voltage... with
resistance you read the lower voltage..
said another way, current flow creates the resistance. the
more current flowing the more resistance. reducing the size
of the conductor increases such resistance. If the conductor
is large enough and the current flow is low enough there is no
measurable resistance...but there will always be some
resistance with current flow.
Phil Scott

I had a discussion (again) with my father the other evening. This one has
baffled me for years.
The mains on the street supply the house. They make available 50Hz, 60 Amp,
240VAC. This is 240x60=14400 Watts (14.4 kW) !!!
That is enough to lift my 1.6 tonne car at a velocity of almost one m/s.
That's a vertical lift of aprox 4 kmph. Not all that fast, but faster than I
could lift the thing!
And when I turn on my light switch, my little 60 Watt bulb glows nicely, at
a rate not many more times greater than that my car hifi consumes.
Why is this so?

I had a discussion (again) with my father the other evening. This one has
baffled me for years.
The mains on the street supply the house. They make available 50Hz, 60 Amp,
240VAC. This is 240x60=14400 Watts (14.4 kW) !!!
That is enough to lift my 1.6 tonne car at a velocity of almost one m/s.
That's a vertical lift of aprox 4 kmph. Not all that fast, but faster than I
could lift the thing! With some imagination we could rig say 10 houses and
drive to the moon at the legal speed limit!!
And when I turn on my light switch, my little 60 Watt bulb glows nicely, at
a rate not many more times greater than that my car hifi consumes.
Why is this so?

Maybe the water analogy is one way to address this question.
You house have water mains with maybe 50 to 100 psi pressure (voltage).
The mains are capable of supplying hundreds of gallons (amperes) a
minute (gallons per minute = watts).
If you turn your faucet on full open you may get several gallons per
minute out of it. Yet you can open the faucet just a bit and get a few
drops a minute.

As the impedance of the supplying transformer approaches the impedance of
the load the voltage is divided between them according to ohms law. That is
why many plants that have 208/3 phase and only REALLY have about 200 volts
at the equipment. Just plain overloaded.....Ross

Phil,
You do talk a lot of DRIVEL.
The resistance does NOT varey with the current.
The voltage drop due to the current times the reistance increases with
incrase in current (simple Math).

"Billy H" wrote in
message news:43f8d16a$0$82638$ snipped-for-privacy@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
The simple analogy is that of a reservoir full of water.
When you fill a glass from the reservoir you only get what you need not
the millions of gallons that are available.
Similarly each electric device only uses the current and hence the power
that it is designed to use and not all that happens to be available at
any point in the supply system.

I don't care which way you say it, that explanation is just plain wrong.
Wire has resistance. Period. It is a function of the wire size, length,
material, and temperature. It doesn't vary with current (before the purists
jump on this, yes, it will change very slightly with the temperature which
is a function of current, but that is insignificant for purposes of
clarifying his statement).
When current flows through the wire resistance, it develops a voltage drop
across it, which depends on the current by Ohm's law. Therefore, the voltage
at the load is lower than at the supply. The more current, the lower the
load end voltage.
Ben Miller

Wire no matter how fine, even 1 angstrom, microscopic in
diameter has no resistance what so ever if there is no flow.
Sorry, thats just how it is. Resistance is a function of
how many electrons you are trying to push through the wire
(and the temperature of the wire... super cooled wire has very
little resistance).
It is a function of the wire size, length,
You have right but you have your language confused... and you
have missed on the issue the original poster was asking
about..which is why does the voltage drop with a load applied.
Indicating that he is getting a higher voltage across the
feeders with no load, which will virtually always be the
case.... than with a load applied, which voltage then is
reduced by virtue of the resistance, which ohly shows up with
current flow.
You are making an incorrect assumption that resistance stands
separate from current flow. Ohms law which you cite is clear
on that... drop the volts and amps (current) to zero....and
resistance drops to zero.
Clear enough...no?
its in the algebra also.
Phil Scott

If resistance is a function of "how many electrons you are trying
to push through the wire", I must ask, how many electrons do I
have to push through a 100 ohm resistor to make it 100 ohms?
Mike

Resistance is a physical constant of the wire. You can look up "resistance
per foot" in reference tables for a given size wire at a given temperature.
You can have wire-wound resistors sitting on your bench, with the resistance
clearly marked on them. You can measure the resistance of a wire with 1 mA
flowing or 10A flowing, and it is the same!
I didn't miss it. I explained it. The resistance is there, in the wire.
Voltage drop occurs when current flows.
I must have slept through that class. As I have explained several times,
resistance DOES stand alone.
Not clear at all. Could you cite some reference material that explains your
theory?
Ben Miller

I think that is a superb question... you can also check the
resistance of a motor winding with a hand held ohm meter using
only 9 volts DC current... you can get an ohm reading of say
3 ohms on the run winding, using just the 9 volt meter...and
that 3 ohms when plugged into Ohms law formula's along with
the voltage supplied will give you the accurate measureable
amp draw.... so the resistance appears to be completely
independent of the current through the circuit in that case as
you are saying.
So I am not in disagreement with you at all.... I think there
are some semantics issues though..
and like you said you can purchase resistors with resistance
coded on them.
Using ohms law however you can notice that the resistance in
any *circuit is a function of voltage and amperage... if you
input zero for both voltage and amperage, the formula will
produce zero for resistance...because of course there is no
flow to resist... I think it is this sort of application we
are discussing when it can be seen that voltage drops a
amperage on the line increases beyond the rated current
carrying capacity of the feeders
same with house current at a 15 amp rated receptical for
instance...it might read 110v with a test meter plugged into
the receptical, and a lot less with a 15 amp electric heater
plugged into it. you can see this effect in an inadequately
wired house, as more lights are turned on, others dim...
voltage drop induced by increasing resistance in the
feeders.... that resistance a direct result of current flow.
Comments?
Phil Scott

I have a problem with this-- A.C. motor, D.C. motor it doesn't
matter, once it starts spinning you have inductance resisting A.C.
or pulsing D.C. So I doubt your static D.C. measuement would
be an accurate representation to give you a resistance to calculate
the current draw of a motor.
Yes, you say there is no resistance without current flow,
I say if a tree falls in the woods and no one is present, it still
makes sound.
If you'll notice, ohms law is very linear, all the way to zero but not
zero.
There's just somthing funny about doing calculations with zero.
You don't need to go "beyond rated current carrying capacity
of the feeders" to see the voltage drop caused by the resistance
of the wire.
The voltage will drop as more current is drawn even in an
adequately wired house, it's just a matter of degree.
The resistance doesn't increase because of increased current flow,
it's the voltage drop that increases.
Mike

That is surely the case. there are many examples.. on
the other hand resistance according to Ohms law is zero when
voltage and amperage are zero.... and we can see voltage
dropping on an overloaded parallel lighting circuit as
fixtures are added and the wattage starts to exceed the
current carrying capability of the wire... that was the OP's
original question... then I spun it to resistance...perhaps
incorrectly... as the extra light bulbs were added...
... then the resistance would have dropped in the *load
circuits (the combined light bulbs), causing more amps to flow
in the supply circuit... more amps than the size of wire would
permit without a voltage drop...that is also in the NEC
tables, voltage drop with increasing amperage on a certain
size wire.
the only thing that will cause the voltage to drop as I see it
(and I could be missing something here) is resistance in the
wire... that is also seen in too small house feeders...low
voltage at the house under full load etc.
Comments?
Phil Scott

Phil said,
"more amps than the size of wire would permit without a voltage drop..."
Wire has X amount of resistance per length and the current times that
resistance
equals the voltage drop.
EX. A fifty foot run of #12 wire with 10 amps flowing.
50 feet must be multiplied by two ( the current must return to the source)
So 100 feet of #12 wire has about .16 ohms of resistance.
.16 ohms x 10amps = 1.6 volts
That 50 foot run would have a voltage drop of 1.6 volts with a 10 amp load.

Those would be locked rotor numbers based on the static
resistance of the motor windings alone... once it got going
then there would be impedance I believe as you assert.... and
the running amps would be much lower.
I think the issue is not that the actual resistance NUMBER
goes up, but that when the amperage rises, multiplied by the
static resistance the total wattage of resistance in the wire
increases, it gets hotter.
As the wattage lost to heat in the wire goes up, with
resistance stable, the voltage in the wire must go down.
This algorithm may or may not be entirely relevant to that.

formatting link

that has to be predominantly correct... so what happens then
when you reduce the load or increase the load, will not the
wattage lost in the wire change as the current in the wire
changes...and that wattage is derived from volts x amps...so
as amps rise in the wire of constant resistance, voltage must
drop..... is that not the basis of ohms law as applied to
both loads and losses in any circuit?
agreed... the resistance number remains exactly the
same..so resistance does not incease as I suggested.... the
heat loss in the wire increases, and for that to happen
voltage must drop as amperage increases... I was attributing
that correctly to resistance in the wire, but resistance had
not increased just the wattage lost to the resistance had
increased...
Phil Scott
Phil Scott

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.