Fresh swivel pads for a pair of old twelve inch clamps

Nov 10, 2026 Last reply: 3 hours ago 2 Replies
Jump to replies (2)

The whole project started with a simple problem: two old twelve inch C-clamps had lost their original feet, and the store-bought replacements did not work as-is. Those commercial pads sat too deeply over the ball ends of the screws, and a conical drill-point bottom inside each pad kept the pad from pivoting properly on the ball. Rather than give up on the pads, the maker decided to rework them.



The rework is where this gets interesting. A touch probe centered each pad held in a chuck, and then an end mill cut a flat bottom into the pad cavity, doing away with that cone-shaped floor. On the lathe, round steel stock was turned to diameter to make spacer inserts, and a concave hemispherical socket was machined into each one to seat the ball end. Each finished spacer was parted off with an arbor-mounted slitting saw, with spray lubricant applied during the cut.



Assembly looks satisfying too. The spacer was pressed into the pad using the clamp against a wooden block, and an internal wire retaining ring sits in a groove in the pad to hold everything captive. Snapped onto the clamp screw, the finished assembly showed full swivel action.



One trade-off worth noting: this fix turns a simple pad swap into a multi-part assembly, with a turned spacer and a retaining ring per pad. That seems a fair price for clamps this old getting their feet back.



Project by MakersEase. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


The choice to machine a flat bottom into the pad cavity instead of just accepting the deep fit is the clever part for me. That conical drill-point floor was the whole reason the pads could not pivot, so removing it attacks the actual fault rather than working around it. The cost is extra machining on parts you already paid for, but the result pivots freely, which is the point of a swivel pad in the first place.

A variation worth considering for anyone facing the same fit problem: instead of adding a spacer and retaining ring, you could turn down the threaded section of the screw to give the ball end room for an unmodified pad. That would keep the assembly down to one commercial part per clamp. It does mean cutting on the clamp screw itself, which some will not want to do on old clamps, but it avoids machining the pads at all.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required