First aluminum bronze pour: copper and aluminum only

Oct 17, 2026 Last reply: 1 day ago 4 Replies
Jump to replies (4)

A lot of alloy charts list aluminum bronze with a longer shopping list of metals. TheGrowingStack went the other way and blended just two metals, copper and aluminum, at 89 percent and 11 percent by weight. It was also a first attempt at this alloy, and the castings came out with a bright golden metallic look.



Everything was weighed on a digital scale to hit the target: 1780 g of copper against 220 g of aluminum, 2002 g all in. The charge drew on stripped copper wire, small copper pieces and an aluminum bar, with wire clippings, an aluminum ingot and a small aluminum button also in the pile. The melt ran in a graphite crucible inside a propane furnace lit with burning paper, and the packed metals were heated until everything melted and glowed. Crucible tongs handled the pour into three graphite molds, then the remaining metal was reheated for a fourth, tree-shaped mold.



The finishing sequence looks tidy. Each solidified casting came out of its mold with channel lock pliers and went into a metal bucket of water. Then it was clamped in a bench vise for the wire wheel, followed by white and red rouge on a motorized bench buffing wheel. The set is a bar ingot, an awareness ribbon, a skull medallion and a tree of life medallion, 1817 g combined, now resting on a wooden shelf beside earlier aluminum, copper and brass work.



The stated reason for keeping the blend to two metals is that the other alloying metals were not on hand. The open question is weight: the finished pieces run 185 g under the starting metal, and the maker flagged that loss without explaining where it went. That gap is the one thing I would most want chased down in a follow-up melt.



Project by TheGrowingStack. Watch it on their YouTube channel:

formatting link


Reheating the leftover melt for the tree mold seems like a smart move to me. It turns what could have been a scrap puddle into a fourth finished piece without weighing out a fresh charge. The trade-off is that part of the batch sits at pouring heat longer before it gets used, and that is the cost I would weigh against the extra casting.

I am curious about furnace startup. How was the burning paper actually used to light the propane furnace, and did the paper go in before the propane was flowing or after?

Burning paper was used to ignite the furnace. Where the paper sat in the startup order, before or after the propane, has not been said. That is the only ignition method tied to this melt.

If TheGrowingStack runs this blend again, splitting the 2002 g charge into two smaller melts could make the finished weight easier to line up with the target. Smaller batches also leave metal for a spare pour if a mold misbehaves. Given the 185 g shortfall this time, that seems like a reasonable experiment to try.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required