- posted
13 years ago
The new F-35 Stovl
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
Cool
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
The libtards will kill it like they did the F-22.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
A boondoggle.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
You just don't like America to have a technological advantage on the battlefield.
You just don't like America.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
I see it as a fantastic plane that can save those in hot spots and one that can fly in - hide over a hill and then hop up and fight when vectored into a fight. E.G. - stay out of radar until you want them to know.
Mart>
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
Maybe, could be...
But could also be a big heavy complex lumbering hulk when what it needed is a squadron of A-4s at 1/10th the cost.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
btw...
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
The next generation of airplanes may have pilots, but they will not be flying in the airplane.
i- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
Too expensive!!! For the Navy $35 million /plane. For me, too expensive for to commute! (o: JS
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
The "you hate America" and it's variants is a sure sign of having no valid arguments.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
A-4 can't operate from an LHA or LHD, which is why the Marines fly Harriers. And an A-4 can't live in the same sky with, well, just about anything these days.
A-4 would be false economy, not event the Israelis are still using them as anything but trainers. Fine for beating up lightly armed terrorists but these days that's about _all_ that it's good for. Against any kind of halfway modern fighter or any kind of halfway decent ground defense the A-4 is toast. Sure, it would be handy in Iraq right now, but what do we do, build a bunch of obsolete airplanes for a single short-term mission and retire them when it's over? That's not wise use of resources. In any case, one F-35 pretty much _is_ a squadron of A-4s in terms of ordnance delivered on target--it carries as much as 3 A-4s and has vastly better targeting systems.
As for "lumbering", the F-35 is designed to be able to take down fighter aircraft two generations newer than the A-4. Nothing that can do that can be said to be "lumbering".
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
:
So you don't like American soldiers, sailors, marines and airmen to have a technological edge on the battlefield?
When you read of the deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan, you wish for American deaths to be higher?
Just askin.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
te:
You are like those idiots who, after 9-11, claimed to be bigger patriots than their neighbor because they had 98 US flag decals on their car and the neighbor only had 95.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
rote:
How am I like them?
I merely wrote a blank check to our nation, up to and including my life.
Lots of people did. And even more cannot fathom or even appreciate it. Like you, for one.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
Corrected to reflect accuracy.
Gunner
I am the Sword of my Family and the Shield of my Nation. If sent, I will crush everything you have built, burn everything you love, and kill every one of you. (Hebrew quote)
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
e:
And it was spent on Gumby's medical care, him being such a patriot.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
ote:
Gunner is a veteran. He's already worth 10 of you.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
Veteran of what? You don't seem to know that a legit veteran has health care, and all you have are glib answers that make it obvious that you have very little thinking skills.
- Vote on answer
- posted
13 years ago
I strongly recommend you talk to the next veteran you meet concerning the price and availability of veterans health care.
I'm retired military. CHAMPUS/TRICARE will NOT be first payer on any medical, so I pay for BlueCross. I can get free prescriptions if I drive to the nearest military base, only 65 miles one way. I get no dental coverage from the military.
Yep, I get health care, of sorts.
You are very misinformed.
technomaNge