Welder circuit breaker rating?

Hey guys,
Got a question about circuit breakers, I have a HarbourFreight stick welder, that is marked 120/240v draws 41 Amps, Does this mean it draws 41
Amps at 120 or 20.5 Amps at 240V? I'm talking about through each leg, if hooked up as 220V.
I have it wired the welder hooked up for 220V operating, and have a dbl pole 40 Amp breakers in my panel, it's been working fine for the past year. Is the dbl pole 40 breaker the correct size for this application? Does this mean that each leg of the break is capable of drawing 40 amps each?
Should I reduce the size of this break to a dbl pole 25 Amp breaker? By the way, I installed this dbl pole 40 Amp breaker myself last year.
Thanks. Jeff
--
A7N8X-Deluxe, AMD XP2500+ (Un-locked)
2x256mb Crucial PC3200 DDR ram
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
You should size the breaker for the wire, not for the load.
Size the wire for the load. :)
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
As Gigs said, size the breaker for the wire. A 40 amp breaker should be attached to 8 gauge wire, as I recall it. If the wire is 10 ga or less, replace it with 8 gauge.
40 amps or 50 amps at 220 volts sounds right for a typical stick welder. Mine is wired to a 50 amp breaker.
Richard
Gigs wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
In article <1119797867.565455.246460

Yes, *but*, the NEC allows the conductors supplying a welder to carry more than their normal rated ampacity. For example, if we assume the welder in question with a primary rated current of 41 amps has a 20% duty cycle rating, then the supply conductors need only have a rated ampacity of 18.5A. So you could conceivably have an installation with 14ga wire protected by a 40A breaker feeding the welder.
There are other things to consider (including whether this sort of thing is a good idea in a residential setting in the first place), but the provisions are there in the NEC if you care to take the time to understand them.
Ned Simmons
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Although the NEC allows conductors supplying a welder to carry more than their rated capacity, I would never size the breaker for more than the ampacity of the wire. Remember the breaker will also carry more than its rated capacity on a duty cycle of 20%. If you " protect " 14 gauge wire with a 40A breaker, you might have the insulation melt before the breaker trips.
Dan
Ned Simmons wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
snipped-for-privacy@krl.org wrote:

That's the entire point of the duty cycle, You can hit the wire with a high current but before it overheats, either you stop welding or the welder trips on thermal and allows the wire to cool down. Alot like pulse welding where ya set your peak amperage to 150 - 200% normal amperage and can still make a good weld. Don't forget also that you can size you breaker up to 200% the rated input current of the welder, on a miller thunderbolt, one could be running 10ga supply conductors on a 90A breaker and still be within code. Everything depends on the particular welder you are using, The welder will not draw more than the rated input amps unless there is a dead short and the welder will not draw high currents for any length of time due to the duty cycle. Change the welder and you are back to square one.
Nate
--
Http://www.Weber-Automation.net:8000

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
There are several types of circuit breakers. One type is a thermal circuit breaker. You would not want to use a 90a thermal circuit breaker with 10 gauge wire.
Copied from Electronic Design article on circuit breakers.
"Appropriate for equipment where high-surge currents accompany the start of motors, thermal circuit breakers use bimetal technology to discriminate between safe switch-on currents/transients and prolonged overloads. A typical thermal breaker must trip within one hour at 140% of its rating. A latching mechanism makes these devices highly tolerant of shock and vibration."
lets see 140 percent of 90 amps is 126 amps. So you think it might be alright to run 126 amps through 10 gauge wire for an hour? Granted most circuit breakers are not thermal breakers, but without knowing the breaker type, I would not recommend sizing the breaker for more current than the wire is rated for. I have no problem recommending using a welder on a circuit with wire that can not handle the input current of a welder on a 100 % duty cycle.
Dan
Nate Weber wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I think with the typical residential installation in the U.S.A. you are going to be relying on the thermal trip characteristics of the breaker. But with good equipment, it should not be as bad as it might sound.
My house has a Square D QO load center, which is generally considered a good brand and line, and is used in commercial buildings as well as residences. The breakers have both thermal and magnetic trips. The higher the overcurrent condition, the faster the thermal trip. Moderate overcurrent conditions will indeed take a while to trip, in the case of a 50A QO breaker, something on the order of 40 seconds at 150%. The magnetic trip does not come into play until something close to 20 times the rated current is going through the breaker, when it trips nearly instantaneously. The magnetic trip is there only to deal with catastrophic problems like dead shorts in the equipment or line. That said, there are a lot of other brands and lines out there, and some may have very different trip characteristics.
FWIW, I would use the largest wire within reason that will fit the terminals of the breaker and receptacle if for no other reason than to minimize voltage drop. On a short run, it won't make much of a difference in cost. On a long run, you may need the bigger size to maintain a reasonable input voltage or have the required ampacity after derating for ambient temperature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

If the welder has a max rated input current of 48.5 Amps and a Duty cycle of 20% how is anyone going to pull 126 amps for an hour? I could dead short the welder leads at max output and draw 48.5 amps for about 2 or so minutes. After that it would cool down for 8 minutes.
--
Http://www.Weber-Automation.net:8000

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
In article <1120098843.355098.302240

The circuit breakers described in that article are not permitted for branch circuit protection. In fact, if you look at the catalogs published by Cutler-Hammer, SquareD, Siemens, etc., they avoid "circuit breaker" when talking about these devices and refer to them as "supplementary protectors," and reserve the term "circuit breaker" for devices that can be used as branch circuit protection.
The 90A number for #10 wire that's been bandied about is incorrect, at least for the more common insulation classes. There's an additional provision in the NEC section on welders that says that the overcurrent device must be set to no more than twice the conductor rating, so 70A(for 75C insulation - romex) or 80A(for 90C - THHN) is a more realistic high end.
Ned Simmons
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Jeff wrote:

I think you should resize your breaker to a 30 amp double pole breaker.
Current flows out of one leg, through the welder, through the work, back through the welder's ground lead, and back through the other leg. Yes, the current flows in both legs. A little buzzbox stick welder can draw 41 amps at 240VAC. The part you didn't mention is how many amps your welder can weld with. Let's suppose it's 250 amps at 25 volts AC. Power is volts times amps, so that's delivered power of 6250 watts. Let's assume your welder's transformer is 20% lossy, so we'll divide 6250 by 0.8 and get 7812 watts of input power. To calculate the current needed from a 220V plug, divide 7812 by 220 to get 35 amps. So you can see that 41 amps at 220 is not unreasonable. You can almost certainly get by with a 30 amp breaker. If you pulled wire that's too small for a 40 amp breaker (did you use 8 gauge wire or 10 gauge wire?) then it may be prudent to downsize the breaker to 30 amps. By the way, I have a little buzzbox welder, and I run it through a 30 amp breaker and about 15 feet of conduit and a receptacle, and I used no. 10 wire. I never ever turn my welder all the way up, or at least I haven't yet, so this setup is fine for the little buzzbox.
Grant
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
What's in this welder described below, a couple of resistors?
Everyone had better hope that utility system current is not passing through the welder's output leads.
Obviously it is not.
WB ..............

through
flows
The part

suppose
delivered
so
the
can
by
breaker
downsize
run it

and I

I
-
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Wild Bill wrote:

(snicker) Wow what a goober I hacked up that time! I have to laugh at the fact that electrical engineers are capable of the dumbest things sometimes. OK, let's amend it: current flows down one leg, through the primary of the transformer and back through the other leg. Point is, the same current flows in both legs. - GWE

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Don't laugh. I've done it. The "resistor" was a 100-watt light bulb in series with 110-volt power (AC and DC), the welding "stick" was a carbon rod liberated from a carbon-zinc "D" size battery, and the flux was twenty mule team borax. We were welding chromel-alumel thermocouples (with AC and flux) and 3mm diameter platinum capsules (with DC and no flux aside from the carbon monoxide and hydrogen from the carbon rod and moisture in the air), all in the 1970s. Simple, cheap, and worked well.
In those days, the University had its own powerplant, and supplied 110/220 volt DC to the labs. When AC power came, all but the labs converted. In the sub-basement of the lab building there was a four by six foot 1900s-era open-face power panel carrying the 220 volt DC power, controlled by huge bare-metal knife switches and cylinder fuses, all bolted to the front surface of a massive sheet of some kind of black thermoset plastic, perhaps a bakelite composition. A terrifying contraption if there ever was - one stumble or slip, and your goose was *really* cooked. Especially if you were wearing any jewelry.
Joe Gwinn
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
I don't subscribe to the proposal that current flows back out the other input lead. As I've stated before, I always have to ask Ok, THEN where does it go?
The concept that there is a return line is counter-productive to understanding electrical power circuits. If all current travels back into the earth, or some other whimsical theory, nothing would operate as it does. Earth ground connections are for safety only, to insure that a person is never the only path between an electrical potential and earth ground.
In the application of a transformer with a 240VAC input, the supply conductors do just that, they supply.. there is no return. Because it's AC, the two conductors take turns being different potentials to each other (easier to just think that they take turns being zero). When the other line's potential is not zero, current flows through the xfmr's primary winding (back 'n forth within the winding, not out to somewhere else).
In a hydraulic circuit, the oil is returned to the pump (by way of a reservior usually), and the hydraulic circuit is basically a closed loop. Electricity ain't that way.
In an application where the transformer input is 120VAC, the neutral isn't a return line. It's there to establish a potential. No potential, no worky.
For either xfmr, the output of the secondary winding floats until circuit potentials are established. The potential between one of the secondary terminals (either one) and earth ground is essentially zero. No potential, no current (aside from the microamp xfmr leakage, assuming that the xfmr is not faulty). Some digital voltmeters are flakey when measuring similar points, and give false voltage readings, but there is absolutely no usable current present. When a circuit is established, the secondary winding terminals are both supply lines, there is no return.
Yeah, but my AC amp clamp meter shows current in the neutral line. Does the meter show which direction it's flowing? Didn't think so, 'cause it's alternating. An oscilloscope won't help. There's no point in trying to tag a sinewave peak to see it being used up. You can't count the number of sinewaves that a table lamp uses. It's not helpful to consider sinewaves as quantitiy of consumables. Ever heard of a sinewave storage capacity for an AC capacitor? 'Course not.
WB ...............

through
fact
let's
transformer and

legs. - GWE

-
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Think whatever you like, Bill. Whatever floats yer boat. Just size both conductors sufficient to carry the full amps, not half the amps, and all will be good. - GWE
Wild Bill wrote:

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
If you think about it, only the electrons on my side of the transformer and those in the ground that might mix in - flow in my circuits. The power company induce current flow in the transformer. Without circular flow of some kind, only a static or no current flow condition exists.
Now - if I can only charge the power company for use of 'my electrons'. :-)
Martin
Grant Erwin wrote:

--
Martin Eastburn
@ home at Lion's Lair with our computer lionslair at consolidated dot net
  Click to see the full signature.
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
There is no circular flow, this is a misconception.
The subject began as a discussion of a 240VAC circuit for a welder. Since 240VAC appliances do not require an earth ground (for anything other than safety, not current) to produce an output , there is no return path to earth ground. The earth ground lead of the appliance's power cord isn't connected to the welder's transformer terminals. It's connected to the case of the welder to make it a safe appliance to use. In the event of an internal fault, the case remains at earth ground potential (zero volts). When the current level reaches the circuit breaker rating, the circuit breaker will open. The case is earth grounded so that the operator doesn't die in the event of an internal fault in the welder.
In normal operation, there is no return to anywhere, and definitely not to the utility company transformer. The appliance causes the power to be expended/used/dissipated internally.
There is no trickery or deceit going on here. The 100W on the top of the incandescent light bulb basically means that the bulb consumes 100W. Ten of 'em left on for an hour is 1 KWH that you'll be charged for. In the winter, you've received the light plus the benefit of the heaters. In the summer, you pay to have the heat removed from the house by an air conditioner. Gotcha. The water heater element wattage rating means the same thing.
Anyone can take a stab at an explanation of where the current goes when it goes back thru one of the supply lines by calling it a return, but they have no explanation of where it goes. Just because it's a common belief that it must return, don't make it fact. The fact that some of the utility power distribution points are grounded is because power companies have to deal with lightning strikes, line breaks and transformer failures. They have to pay for insurance too, and they don't want household lines to suddenly jump up into the kilovolts range in the event of a fault/failure or accident. The ground rods driven into the dirt out at the pole or across the street (or other points for underground service) don't create a return path for your household appliances.
If I connect one terminal of a AA battery to an earth ground, is the battery charging or draining? What's going on with the hypothetical ground electrons? Pushing? No. Pulling? No. Flowing in either direction? No. A battery is an example of an isolated supply. We know the battery is capable of providing useable current. Is it flowing? No.
Most homes are powered from the isolated secondary winding of the utility company's transformer. (I already understand that there is a center tap, and it's the home service panel's neutral bar). That supply is a floating source, just as the secondary of an ordinary power transformer is (explanation of a common power xfmr in earlier post).
There is no usable current path from a floating xfmr secondary winding to earth ground (microamp xfmr leakage excluded).
There isn't much point in injecting electrons into a dicussion of electrical power, but I'll go along. When the spark occurs at your finger tip when you touch a door knob mounted in a wooden door, where do the electrons go? I don't care either, but I'll read the explanations.
WB .................
"lionslair at consolidated dot net" <"lionslair at consolidated dot net"> wrote in message

and those

induce
a static

:-)
-
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
<ROTFLMAO> And the earth is to flat! :)

Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload
Bill,
It is preposterous to say that the electrons flow out and go somewhere mysterious and never return during normal operation. There is definitely a return on a 240V circuit going to a welder. Electrons flow down one leg, thought the transformer winding in the welder, then back up the other leg. Re-examining the situation 16.6mS later, of course the current is flowing the opposite direction. But whatever electrons flow out on one leg of the circuit come back up the other side. Thats why its called a "circuit".
I'm not sure what point you are shooting for here, and you are correct in many cases, i.e. saying that there is no current flow to earth ground. But you are mistaken in saying there is no return. A conductor can provide a return path without being at earth ground potential. Similarly on 120V circuits, the return path is the neutral line, which is also not necessarily at earth ground potential (indeed, because of the return current flowing across its resistance).
-Holly
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
<%-name%>
Add image file
Upload

Site Timeline

  • - the site's newest thread. Posted in

Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.