Brass flame tube brings a real flame to a 64mm edf

Oct 14, 2026 Last reply: 4 minutes ago 3 Replies
Jump to replies (3)

The hardest part of this build is getting the fuel ratio right between the flame holder area and the main airflow, and the maker is attacking it head on. Rather than running calculations, they openly admit to winging the design, sketching a cross-section that maps where the tiny and medium fuel streams should sit. Where the main flame front will end up is still the big unknown, and they seem fine finding out by testing.



The construction so far is tidy. The flame tube is brass joined with stainless steel rivets, and a single brass tube will run down the center of most of the afterburner, feeding fuel through radial holes to both the flame holder and the main flame. The flame holder itself has air inlets at the front plus adjustable petals, which gives a tuning path if the flame refuses to stay lit. Fireproof material will separate the tube's outside from the plane's foam, which seems like a smart call on a foam airframe.



The whole thing is meant for a Horizon Hobby Viper style 64mm airframe, and the maker is clear that it is purely for looks, adding zero thrust. The aim is a very clean cone of flame out the back, capturing some of the fun of big turbine jets without the cost, hangar space and maintenance.



There are honest trade-offs here. An 8 ounce butane can likely buys under 30 seconds of burn, so flights will be short bursts only. Nothing works yet either; whether the tube can hold combustion at all remains unproven, and the rivets still need sanding down before the next stage.


The adjustable petals look like the smartest part of the design to me. If the flame blows out of the flame holder, they can be pinched down to change the local conditions instead of rebuilding anything. That turns the biggest risk, blowout, into a tuning problem. The trade-off is one more thing to fiddle with mid-test, but for a scratch concept that seems worth it.

How far down the flame holder tube is the butane outlet going to sit? The maker mentioned still deciding on the placement, and I am curious what the options even are. It seems like outlet position would shift where the fuel mixes with the incoming air, which ties straight into whether the front air inlets can calm the flow enough to keep the flame anchored.

Once it lights reliably, I would suggest adding a nozzle for a bit of extra thrust. Since the maker wants it working first, that is the sensible order anyway, but a hot expanding gas stream seems like a waste to dump straight out the back if a simple nozzle could recover some push. It would not change the visual, and even a small thrust gain would turn a purely cosmetic feature into a usable one.

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required