ARM: Review - 1/35 scale StuG III (Fl)

Kit Review: 1/35 scale Kit No. 72 (Dragon Models
Limited 1/35 Scale =9139-=9145 Series Kit No. 6753); StuG III (Fl); 797
parts (547 in grey styrene, 216 =93Magic Track=94 links, 19 etched brass,
14 clear styrene, 1 length of twisted steel wire); pre-order price US
$49.95 via Dragon USA Online
Advantages: First injection molded kit of this type
Disadvantages: unknown due to low production numbers and limited photo
evidence of use
Rating: Recommended
Recommendation: For all WWII German fans and a few diehard Finnish and
Syrian modelers
The latest boutique entry from DML=92s affiliate is a
kit of what is essentially the StuG III Ausf. F/8 fitted with a fixed
flamethrower. Ten conversions of this type were made in mid 1943 but
information on use is sketchy. For some odd reason the Germans adopted
a fixed flamethrower for their heavy vehicle mount which meant the
vehicle had to be close to its target and pointed right at it to
operate. Soviet, American and British vehicle were usually all gun
tanks fitted with supplemental flame projectors that had at least a
limited amount of traverse or were turret mounted, which meant much
more flexibility of use and better engagements. For once this does not
appear to be a very good solution to the problem by German
As with other kits, it uses most of the past sprues from the Ausf. F/
8 kit but adds one new sprue of six parts for the flame projector as
well as an etched brass armored cover for the aperture for the
The same 20-piece etched brass fret is included with the wheel rims
and the air intake and exhaust grilles on the engine deck plus some
non-slip gridding. It also comes with the styrene mounts and etched
nickel schurtzen protective shielding.
Technical assistance was provided by Tom Cockle and Gary Edmundson.
One generic finishing option is provided: Unidentified Unit (probably
a testbed), 1943 (sand with crosses on the sides and rear). A tiny
Cartograf decal sheet is provided.
Overall this is a different variant of the StuG and due to the low
production numbers and lack of information on its combat use a good
choice for to kit.
Thanks to Freddie Leung for the review sample.
Cookie Sewell
Reply to
Loading thread data ...

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.