Someone I'm doing some work with on a project swears you can plot a
line in solidworks using an equation. (He's more of a ProE guy than a
solidworks guy - please don't throw stones my way...)
I have been doing some conic sections recently by actually sectioning a
cone, using "offset entities" to create a sketch of the conic section,
then chopping away the sectioned cone, leaving me with my sketch of a
hyperbola, parabola, etc.
Is there a way to type in equations for curves?
for example: y = x^2
or: y = sin(x)
or: y = mx + b
(in my 8 years of SW experience, I've never seen it).
I know you should never say never, but I just don't think it's
possible.
Please help prove me wrong! I want to type in equations for a
line/curve!

Almost that simple.
If you want something like a spline on a sketch plane then record a
macro.
The macro will contain the creation of the sketch and the spline.
Delete the sketch used to create the macro and edit the macro.
The basic idea is to create a FOR - NEXT loop that defines the spline.
The one thing you have to watch out for is that the number of spline
points used has to count down to 1.
You create a parametric equation for x like:
x = A* sin(2*pi()*i/N)
where A and N are the amplitude and number of points to be plotted.
Then
A = 1
N = 20
FOR i = N to 1 step -1
x=2*pi()*i/N
y=sin(x)
code for creating a spline point with parameters i, x, y, 0
NEXT i
You will have to use your own analytic geometry skills to adjust the
origin for the curve as well as how many cycles, etc.
However, now is a good time to ask that SW really get on the parametric
bandwagon so that such an equation can be driven by distance along
another curve like Pro/E.

...and Thank You Matt for the link to the macro!
I used this a month or so ago and it worked great for the
parabolic mirror I was working on.
Thank you again,
sjm1.pitt

I examined your macro, Matt. Overall, very nice. One more reason that
I am a fan of your work.
SW sketches support parabolas. For this purpose (a parabolic mirror), a
parabola in a sketch is going to be more accurate, especially if you
need the optical properties. Interpolating a spline (like the macro
does) is going to introduce slight errors due to the fact that SW
splines are 2nd degree in X and Y. I have done some comparisons in the
past laying splines over parabolas to see how close they are. The
spline always has some error, no matter how well defined.
A true parabola can be fully defined by 3 points. From the parabola
equation, it is possible to determine three points to fully define and
sketch a parabola. In the case f a parabolic mirror, you probably want
to control the focus and apex (which actually define w/ 2 points).

Thanks Tick, that is intresting. The mirror was for a flashlight
prototype that was to be SLA'ed then a mirror plating applied.
I'll model the same mirror with the parabola sketch command and pop
both models into GeoMagic Qualify and compare.
sjm1.pitt

Thanks for the info everyone.
For a "perfect" hyperbola, it looks like I'm still stuck with doing
actual conic sections, then chopping away that's used to create it.
Thanks though! I'm sure I'll find some other uses for the spline
macro. That's very cool!!!

Hi Tick,
I drew the mirror in SW using the parabola sketch tool.
Then using GeoMagic Qualify 6, I compared the two models.
There was a small difference between the two I examined your macro, Matt. Overall, very nice. One more reason that

I suppose I wouldn't sweat it too much over a flashlight. Wasn't
trying to bee too nit-picky. Mostly I'm just a bit of a math geek, so
I tend to dig deeper into how CAD programs process geometry.

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.