Darn! I could've used that add in :-(
99% of my designs will have a wir> Philippe, the (expensive) SolidWorks add-in named EmbassyWorks was a
product of Linius Corp., purchased fairly recently by AutoDesk as Mr.
> Miller pointed out. It has/had a good bit more than SolidSketch, but I
> really like the capabilities of your add-in software (finally got a
> chance to put a plug in for ya). Some of what it has/had includes(d) a
> database to track connections (like a netlist), utilizing Oracle (huge
> memory hog) and the capability to do "nailboard" layouts of a wiring
> harness with wire lengths specified as well as do schematics, all of the
> above being associative. It has/had a huge collection of connectors as
> well, and you could logically assign a heirarchical system of reference
> designators to wires, connectors and (I believe) to the units they
> connected together. Actually, in my opinion it is/was rather much
> overkill for any need that I might have had, or for any project that
> I've been involved in using SolidWorks. If you were designing a fighter
> aircraft for Lockheed-Martin with all the documentation requirements
> that the Defense Department lays on prime contractors, that would be a
> different story. If you could do as much as unravel wiring harnesses
> made with SolidSketch into a "nailboard" configuration with wire lengths
> I'll bet you could find some takers.
>
> Best regards,
> 'Sporky'
>
> Philippe Guglielmetti wrote:
>
>>"Paul Miller" wrote
>>
>>>Embassy was purchased by Autodesk. No longer on SW partner list. >>
>>Does it mean there is a market here (again) ? Any other player ?
>>What are the most important features of such a product ?
>>(we have a very basic "wiring" example done with our SolidPlus add-in at
>>formatting link)
>>
>>Philippe Guglielmetti -formatting link
>
>