Re: Kadet Senior ARF

I finished assembling a Kadet Senior ARF, with a 2-cycle .46, for my wife about 3 weeks ago. Or at least I thought I had! Then I checked the balance and found it to be big-time tail heavy. I had the battery and the receiver forward of the cabin area, against the the former that supports the rear of the fuel tank, at the time. I had to put over 10 ounces of lead into the model, in that location, to balance it correctly!

I don't like heavy hubs for various reasons, didn't have one anyway. Don't like to glue weights to the front of the firewall because I've had them come loose from there, even when epoxied on. Don't like Sig's idea of glueing weights inside the cowl: tried that once, the cowl eventually cracked and lost some of the weights in flight. So I bit the bullet, removed the spinner, cowl, engine and fuel tank, in order to put the battery and weights against the rear of the firewall, along with suitable foam to hold stuff all in place. I alsu used a heavier nosewheel. I was able to cut the extra weight down to about 4 ounces that way. Others might think it was a lot of work to save a little bit of weight but it was worth it to me. I hate dead weight in a model if I can find a way to eliminate all or part of it.

As soon as I got the thing all done the bad weather closed in on our area, so we didn't put the first flight on it until last Monday. It flies well and those big barn-door ailerons provide a lot more roll response than I expected them to at landing speed. That's a damned good thing in a gusty cross wind.

If I ever put another one together, I'd move the servos as far forward in the "radio compartment" as I could and I'd use Goldenrods to move the tail surfaces. A 4-stroke engine might be a good idea too.

Cheers,

CR

jwgfeb wrote:

I just built an ARF Kadet Senior and I had to place enough lead to > almost cover the firewall with a 1/8 inch layer of lead. A couple more > guys in the club are all saying the same thing about it being way two > tail heavy, BUT, it flys really good, even with all this weight. We > mored the CG to the Rear of the main beam and it flew,but needed to > have the elevator trim almost all the way to the end, in the down > elevator position, to make it fly level. I think they need to design it > with the wing back a little but I'm satisfied with it's performance > with my .46 2 stroke. Usually fly at half throttle or less, to keep it > from going into space. have a great time with yours. > Joe > > > +----------------------------------------------------------------+ > | Attachment filename: leadoutpixs.jpg | > |Download attachment:

formatting link
|> +----------------------------------------------------------------+

> -- > jwgfeb >

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted from the RCGroups.com Discussion Forums. > Visit us at
formatting link
View this thread at rcgroups.com:

formatting link

Reply to
Charles & Peggy Robinson
Loading thread data ...

formatting link
|> > +----------------------------------------------------------------+

formatting link
>

>
Reply to
strathboy

The Kadet Senior ARF comes with the servo tray already installed. It also uses balsa dowel pushrods that won't reach the front of the cabin area. I put the thing together expecting to be able to balance the model without having to add a prohibitive amount (to me) of weight to it. I posted my experience with the model in order to inform others, so they'll know ahead of time.

I d> Its always advisable to balance your aircraft BEFORE you permanently

Reply to
Charles & Peggy Robinson

I was just repeating what I had read here. A few guys a while back had said something to the effect that the heavy hubs reduce the life of the front bearings and supposedly do quite a number on sleeve bearings. I thought I had mentioned that I hadnt any personal experience using them but had heard that this happens. I might have omitted that. I just siliconed lead into the cowl on my KSA.

Reply to
Fubar

A nice, heavy, torquey, scale-sounding Saito .65 is the perfect engine for these tail-heavy airplanes.

Good flying, Bob Scott

Reply to
Bob

Yup, and if I'd had one lying around.......... ;^)

CR

Bob wrote:

Reply to
Charles & Peggy Robinson

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.