I have found siting the plane on frozen water/ice
substantially reduced the range on a range test...
I have to stand or have the plane held on its nose (rx
antenna vertical) to do a decent range check... same on wet
(saturated) ground...
Dave
>I tried to fly my Extra 300s today. It's fitted with an Airtronics RX and
>>TX. The rx has a 6 V battery and the tx has a 9.6V battery.
>>
>>So I took the plane to a frozen pond hoping to fly...winds 8-10mph. During
>>preflight I noticed that I wasn't getting the normal range when checked at
>>about 100ft away. Anyway to shorten things I didn't feel comfortable so I
>>packed it in and went home. I had a friend check the voltage on both tx and
>>rx. The tx voltage was good 9.6 - 10 V. However, the rx was down to 5 and
>>5.1 V. Is this normal for the Airtronics rx battery pack? Would this
>>reduce the range? It was sitting idle for about week and half, so I had it
>>on charge for about 8 hours this morning to top it up. I'm wondering if
>>it's still good? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
>>
> Couple things here set me wondering.
>You state a receiver 6 volt batt, yet you call it an Airtronics battery pack.
>Now if it is a pack that came with the radio, I believe it is a standard 4 cell
>nicad which is a 4.8 volt rated battery. The exception is if you added a 5 cell
>pack. Did you do that?
>
>The receiver 4 cell will often charge close to a 6 volt indication, but will
>not stay there long and rather soon will be back to the 5-5.2 range. >
>You stated that you live in cold area -- frozen pond -- so is your equipment in
>a room temperature or in a colder place?
>Nicads loose a good bit per day until down to half capacity. A week in cold wx.
>would be a significant reduction.
>If you truly have a 6 volt batt. and you use the standard wall-wart to charge,
>it will not charge. You should check the output of the charger as you will need
>at least 7 volts to charge the 5 cell batt and 7.5 will be better.
>I use a 7.5 volt 300 ma for charging 5 cell packs and any batt over 800ma. >
>So if you are using standard packs your 8 hour charge on a cold system with a
>supplied wall-wart is well in the ball-park. Need more info to better analyze. >
>HC
>>TX. The rx has a 6 V battery and the tx has a 9.6V battery.
>>
>>So I took the plane to a frozen pond hoping to fly...winds 8-10mph. During
>>preflight I noticed that I wasn't getting the normal range when checked at
>>about 100ft away. Anyway to shorten things I didn't feel comfortable so I
>>packed it in and went home. I had a friend check the voltage on both tx and
>>rx. The tx voltage was good 9.6 - 10 V. However, the rx was down to 5 and
>>5.1 V. Is this normal for the Airtronics rx battery pack? Would this
>>reduce the range? It was sitting idle for about week and half, so I had it
>>on charge for about 8 hours this morning to top it up. I'm wondering if
>>it's still good? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.
>>
> Couple things here set me wondering.
>You state a receiver 6 volt batt, yet you call it an Airtronics battery pack.
>Now if it is a pack that came with the radio, I believe it is a standard 4 cell
>nicad which is a 4.8 volt rated battery. The exception is if you added a 5 cell
>pack. Did you do that?
>
>The receiver 4 cell will often charge close to a 6 volt indication, but will
>not stay there long and rather soon will be back to the 5-5.2 range. >
>You stated that you live in cold area -- frozen pond -- so is your equipment in
>a room temperature or in a colder place?
>Nicads loose a good bit per day until down to half capacity. A week in cold wx.
>would be a significant reduction.
>If you truly have a 6 volt batt. and you use the standard wall-wart to charge,
>it will not charge. You should check the output of the charger as you will need
>at least 7 volts to charge the 5 cell batt and 7.5 will be better.
>I use a 7.5 volt 300 ma for charging 5 cell packs and any batt over 800ma. >
>So if you are using standard packs your 8 hour charge on a cold system with a
>supplied wall-wart is well in the ball-park. Need more info to better analyze. >
>HC