Speed record of powered aircraft models

Does being an amateur constitute an arbitrary category? Aircraft model flying is not the only recreational activity, where the borderline between amateurs and professionals might be getting somewhat blurred. For example, this condition today is already much more advanced in modern amateur astronomy than in model aircraft flying. And just as in model aircraft flying, it has been caused by the availability of advanced technology to the amateur.

The concept of model aircraft flying has in fact always implied that it is done by amateurs. And due to the advent of micro turbines, we now have a new branch of high tech model aircraft flying developing and extending itself. And this new development means, that the definition of the model aircraft pilot has to adapt itself to the new circumstance in such a manner, that the always implied amateur status of the model aircraft pilot has now to be made explicit.

In other words: The amateur status of the aircraft modeler has to become the key element in the definition of his product (the "model aircraft"), in distinction to the UAV or whatever. There are winds of change blowing, and the amateur model aircraft piloting community will not forever be able to shield them off.

And being a recreational amateur occupation, as long as private airplanes do not become as common as private cars, it ought to be self evident that the amateur has to remain on the ground while piloting his aircraft (no chase plane, and it seems almost ridiculous having to mention this).

If this is too arbitrary for the Guinness book, it ought not be too arbitrary for the FAI.

(cut)

ALL control line models MUST submit to a line pull test regardless of where and when they are flown? The only memory I have of seeing a CL model was during my childhood somewhere in the countryside. It was an impressive model of a WWII fighter, and not exactly small (50+cm). In spite of all of my fascination, when it flew I got scared and ducked. Some of the onlookers stood no more than 20ft (6m) from the passing airplane. Nobody of them cared to check the model if it satisfied AMA (or their german equivalent) regulations. Just a personal memory.

Peter

Reply to
Peter Holm
Loading thread data ...

I snipped all that stuff on amateurs. As you pointed out in your other post, there are engines now available to our hobby that can propel models at near supersonic speeds. To try to fly models at those speeds from a fixed point on the ground is ludicrous, and could not be done in a safe manner. Encouraging such activities would only draw unwanted government attention to our hobby. One Sixty minutes style article on the capabilities of the jets in our hobby, coupled with the off-the- shelf auto-pilot systems we can get, combined to give the impression of v-1 wanna-be's, could wreck the hobby as we know it.

formatting link
down to number six.

The AMA safety code says that every CL plane must meet these competition criteria. See the safety code, and scroll down to Control line. It's number one.

formatting link
Failure to do a pull test on your model could void any insurance claims. Few people I know do it every time they fly. Every plane I've built I did a pull test before the first flight, and every few times out, which is what most modelers not competing seem to do. I pull test every new set of lines, and inspect them frequently (when I roll them out, when I pick them up, and any time they are disturbed for any reason).

Reply to
John Alt

The fastest pulsars are known as millisecond, not microsecond, pulsars. The fastest spin at several hundred rotations per second, well below turbine speeds. Then again, most turbines aren't 10 miles in diameter (a quark star is about 6 miles in diameter and is a compressed neutron star) As for the fastest rotating thing on Earth, I don't know what the current record is but many years ago the Guinness Book of Records (which I'm sure you're familiar with) had a listing for an experiment on producing gravitational waves by spinning a 1mm diam ball at 1 million revs per second...yes, that's 60 million rpm!

Brian Hampton Adelaide, South Oz

Reply to
Brian

With centrifugal compressors (the original Whittle style) this is usually done by mounting two compressors back to back (actually machined as a single unit) and either shrouded or unshrouded. Axial compressors are a far better but more complicated way to go. The ideal gas turbine for your high speed RC model would be a low bypass axial flow turbofan with fully modulated afterburner and exhaust augmentation. It's unlikely it would need a mach trim actuator because this is only necessary at Mach 1.7 and by then you begin to have need of a variable geometry inlet as well.

Brian Hampton Adelaide, South Oz

Reply to
Brian

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.