Do Not Model Disturbance Driven Data for Controller Tuning

A fairly common stumbling block for those new to controller tuning relates to step 2 of the controller design and tuning recipe. Step 2 says to
"collect controller output (CO) to process variable (PV) dynamic process data around the design level of operation." But suppose disturbance rejection is our primary control objective? Shouldn't we then step or pulse (or "bump") our disturbance variable to generate the dynamic process test data we require? The short answer is, no. Tuning a feedback controller based on the disturbance to measured process variable dynamic relationship is a certain path to failure...
Read the rest of the article at:
Add pictures here
<% if( /^image/.test(type) ){ %>
<% } %>
Add image file
Upload is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.