Liquid Level Detection

If the ultrasonic sensor is any good, you should be able to adjust it to work through foam. If it's a cheapie preset one, then you need to buy a real one (like

Why does it have to be non-contact? Displacer-type transmitters will likely be much more reliable in a foam situation.

Cameron:-)

Radar cuts through foam. On the whole radar seems to be a superior solution.

Walter.

responsible

responsible

Non-contact was a customer spec. As I understand it the owner remembered having problems with material collection on previous contact type sensors.

I agree with you, and suggested a pressure transmitter with an air bleed, but the owner wasn't receptive to anything except an ultrasonic (they were in use in other areas of the plant (in non-foaming environments) without trouble).

Thank you.

Louis

If the water is relatively clean you could use submersible pressure transmitters, alternatively a DP cell. If the water has suspended solids and you have compressed air to hand, you could use the good old bubble tube and DP cell. Also Milltronics make the radar type reportedly good for foam, but I haven't tried them so cant comment.

responsible

I would set down with the owner, tell him that the ultrasonic is reading the foam level and ask him what to do. If he says something like "you are the expert", tell him that the expert already suggested a solution which he rejected, so now it's his responsibility to either listen to the expert, hire another expert, or solve the problem himself.

If keeping this job is important to you, write up a report with all known solutions with costs, advantages, and disadvantages, and let him pick one. Or hire me and let *me* tell him that his preferred solution won't work .

I agree, use either radar or a bubbler. I have had good success with bubblers in river water intake systems where there is trash and such floating on the surface. Of course, if non-contact is a must, radar is likely the way to go.

TZ