fluorescent lights - electric ballasts

Assuming you mean the compact fluorescent lights, the answer is yes! They have to operate at this high frequency to keep the internal transformer hum-free (at least for our human hearing), small and inexpensive. Gene P.S. BTW in this kind of lights there is no "ballast".

| Do all energy efficient electric ballasts upconvert the source | frequency of 60Hz to 20-50kHz? | | I have a history of symptoms with normal fluorescent lighting | (60Hz/120 blinks per second). I usually put up with it, but feel | better in sun or incandescent lighting.

You will still see 120 blinks per second. Even though the electronic ballast is chopping the power up in thousands of fine slice per second, it still has periods of time in which there is less voltage and the light will still have 120 Hz modulation to it.

If the power were DC, an electronic ballast could make it flicker free. DC would not work on an inductive ballast (the light would be seen as a short circuit and could result in an explosion), and electronic ballasts may also require AC anyway. If one can work on DC, it might be indicated as such. But is it worth building a DC power system just to remove the flicker?

I'm wondering if a 3-phase electronic ballast could be devised which would selectively switch power among phases (there'a always power in at least 2 of them at any instant). That could eliminate the flicker, or at least bump it up to 180 or 360 Hz. But it would play hell on the neutral wire if a lot of lights were done this way (it would be distributing the load on 3 phase hot wires, but the neutral would have to be carrying it all).

Sorry never seen a 3 phase ballast. On 3 phase 480 volt circiuts for lights they are still single phase lights, either 277v from hot to a netural or 480 between hots, and use a contactor for switching. besides lighting circuits in most applications do not draw much power, not enough to be 3 phase. even 1800 watt vapor lamps are single phase.

Also your sec>>

Not always that simple. If the load is non-linear, such as a three, separate phase-neutral full-wave rectifiers, the neutral current can be

*more* than any single phase current. If the magical 3 phase circuit that phil postulated shifts the load from phase to phase as each phase voltage changes, that would be a non-linear type of load and the rms current of the neutral could be higher than rms current through any single phase. Even if all three phase currents are exactly equal. They only cancel out to provide zero neutral current if they are sinusoids.

daestrom

Is converting AC to DC too expensive for fluorescent or any kind of lighting?

in article snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com, Tim923 at snipped-for-privacy@verizon.net wrote on 9/20/04 1:42 PM:

The problem is the ballast. Inductors offer a cheap and low-loss way to stabilize current flow through the tube. To do so on dc will require electronics or an inductor in the primary circuit of the rectifier.

Bill

wHICH is the way my patented ballast works. A bridge circuit is inserted in series with the AC circuit and it controls the light electronically.

in article AII3d.4935$Ii2.148@trnddc09, bushbadee at snipped-for-privacy@verizon.net wrote on 9/20/04 3:20 PM:

You got a patent for that? When? What is the patent number? Did it ever earn a royalty? I know how a bridge circuit can be connected to an ac circuit in many ways, but what do you mean by "inserted in series"?

Bill

Sure did get a patent. Got one in the US, Japan and Germany on it. If I gave you the patent no you would know my name. Well the power came in, went through a capacitor to the lamp, from the lamp to the bridge and from the bridge to the return.

Only about 14 parts total and it regulated from about a couple of micro amps of lamp current to a full 60 ma which was the lamp max. There was no styrating of the lamp at any brightness.