|> | Note that codes inspectors want to see a functioning 3-way switch |> at the top |> | and bottom of stairways in many cases. |>
|> Why do they want a 3-way switch there? I don't recall seeing |> anything in |> the code that requires a 3-way switch. | | two switches controlling the same lights normally requires 3-way | switches
Replace "normally" with "typically" and I'd agree with you. However, that is not a required configuration. An inspector should want to see a switch that will turn the stairway light on and off at each end of the stairway, including midway access landings where two or more segments are controlled in common. It should be verified that turning the light off at any point does not preclude turning it back on at any other point.
If have personally found that 3-way switches pose a minor hazard because of the incorrect orientation of the switch half the time. The typical hazard scenario is carrying things that require two arms, and trying to turn the light on or off and finding an incorrect switch orientation. This could be made worse if a stairway is involved. This hazard can be a major one if what is being carried is a baby.
My house plans for what I will be building in the future specify that no
3-way toggle switches will be allowed in most circumstances. Instead, I will be using those switches that settle into the middle position by the spring force, and make momentary contact to separate wires when pushed up or down. That will then activate a contactor that controls the actual power current. The control side will be 12 volts.
For stairways, there will be two separate contactors controlling the light each each end of the stairway. Thus, if one contactor fails, chances are the other will continue to work for a while. Additionally, motion sensors will be used for stairways to ensure the light comes on and stays on as needed. All switches and sensors will control all contactors for that one stairway.