# f(t) = 40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t)

• posted

For a good time paste this function in

Bret Cahill

• posted

Funny. :)

Thanks, Bret.

Musatov

• posted

Ah don' see no pitcha....

Brian W

• posted

Type in sin(t) and click on the red '=' sign. When you get the idea, try again.

• posted

That was disappointing - that Wolfram's stuff couldn't handle f(t) = 40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t) or solve f(t) = 40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t).

It must be pretty fragile. Maybe it will get stronger. Meanwhile, I'll stick with MatLab.

Brian W

• posted

It works. Just leave off the 'f(t) =' part.

Bob

• posted

But it did handle it, it simply didn't like your syntax. Copy and paste this:

40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t) =

I'm not sure what Cahill finds exciting about it, though.

• posted

Got it! Thanks. I was hoping for more free form capability, I guess

Brian w

• posted

..and then again, it may be totally useless as well as off-topic.

Tom Davidson Richmond, VA

• posted

and the answer is available in many books. However, that requires reading a book.

/BAH

• posted

• posted

Why do nonsensical none math related terms like 'Muslim' keep popping up? I don't buy the motivations of characters on USENET like 'Uncle Al', I think the whole thing is a scam.

-- Musatov

• posted

Usenet is plagued with desperate trolls who can't get anything posted on the moderated groups.

Most of them are mentally ill.

Tom Davidson Richmond, VA

• posted

Usenet is plagued with desperate trolls who can't get anything posted on the moderated groups.

Most of them are mentally ill.

Tom Davidson Richmond, VA ======================================= The mentally ill claim that YOU are mentally ill. How to decide?

• posted

First, the secondary evidence: is the poster anonymous? Is the pseudonym fanciful or indicative of a role player whose grasp may be attenuated?

Then the primary evidence: is the poster respectful, whether agreeing or disagreeing? Is the point a cogent one - or humorous, or amusingly cantankerous? But above all, is the note relevant?

Those would be some criteria one could use, I suppose....

Brian W

• posted

So in your estimation: being respectful, humorous and relevant is primary evidence of mental illness.

Disrespectfully, Androcles.

PolyTech Forum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.