f(t) = 40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t)

Funny. :)

Thanks, Bret.

Musatov

Ah don' see no pitcha....

Brian W

Type in sin(t) and click on the red '=' sign. When you get the idea, try again.

That was disappointing - that Wolfram's stuff couldn't handle f(t) = 40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t) or solve f(t) = 40 + 10t + (4+ t)sin(t)sin(10t).

It must be pretty fragile. Maybe it will get stronger. Meanwhile, I'll stick with MatLab.

Brian W

It works. Just leave off the 'f(t) =' part.

Bob

But it did handle it, it simply didn't like your syntax. Copy and paste this:

I'm not sure what Cahill finds exciting about it, though.

Got it! Thanks. I was hoping for more free form capability, I guess

Brian w

..and then again, it may be totally useless as well as off-topic.

Tom Davidson Richmond, VA

and the answer is available in many books. However, that requires reading a book.

/BAH

Why do nonsensical none math related terms like 'Muslim' keep popping up? I don't buy the motivations of characters on USENET like 'Uncle Al', I think the whole thing is a scam.

-- Musatov

Usenet is plagued with desperate trolls who can't get anything posted on the moderated groups.

Most of them are mentally ill.

Tom Davidson Richmond, VA

Usenet is plagued with desperate trolls who can't get anything posted on the moderated groups.

Most of them are mentally ill.

Tom Davidson Richmond, VA ======================================= The mentally ill claim that YOU are mentally ill. How to decide?

First, the secondary evidence: is the poster anonymous? Is the pseudonym fanciful or indicative of a role player whose grasp may be attenuated?

Then the primary evidence: is the poster respectful, whether agreeing or disagreeing? Is the point a cogent one - or humorous, or amusingly cantankerous? But above all, is the note relevant?

Those would be some criteria one could use, I suppose....

Brian W

So in your estimation: being respectful, humorous and relevant is primary evidence of mental illness.

Disrespectfully, Androcles.