Some local fellow is trying to replace his 240 volt ceramics kiln with
essentially the same thing wired for 208 volt. I don't know if he has an
electronic timer or just a simple kilnsitter that uses pyrometric bars
to shut off. If electronic then I understand but if not what difference
would it make. Firing times might differ but hot is hot and the cones
know when it is just right. The resistor wire shouldn't be that
different for 30 nominal volts.
What am I missing? or is he just wrong.
The only reason I can think of is that when a 240 volt kiln was run on
208 volts it would get up to temperature slower and (possibly) it might
never reach some high temperature he needs to accomplish something he
wants to do.
Watts dissipated in resistance heating is E^2 divided by R, so for a
given value of heater resistance the heat produced at 240 volts would be
about 1/3 more than at 208 volts. That could be enough to make a
difference in the temperature he needs.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 14:38:40 -0700, the renowned firstname.lastname@example.org
(daniel peterman) wrote:
Power will be about 25% lower for that 32V difference in voltage. It
will heat more slowly and won't reach as high a maximum temperature.
He can always buy new elements for the lower voltage. They wear out
anyway, fairly quickly if he's operating at high enough temperatures
to care about the power.
"it's the network..." "The Journey is the reward"
email@example.com Info for manufacturers: http://www.trexon.com
The question was, wouldn't the kiln wired for 240 still reach the
desired temperatue even at 208? I have used kilns alot mostly to fire
overglazes and even at cone 018 they still take many hours to ramp up
and ramp down. Once they shut off you still keep the lid closed for
about 5 hours unless you want the ware to crack. I know where he can get
a 208 kiln but for about 30 dollars he could just buy new kanthal coils
for some sections and not worry about it.
The *ultimate* temperature (running full duty cycle for a long time) will
be lower at 208 vs 240, but if the *desired* temperature is lower than the
ultimate, then yes, it will still reach the desired temperature, but taking
a longer time to do so.
Do you know the duty cycle needed to maintain the desired temperature at
240 volts? If that was more than about 60 percent, then you'll likely
never get there with 208 volts at 100 percent duty cycle.
Resistance wire is cheap. Consider winding your own elements.
Thanks guys. I don't think he knows what he is doing as regards
electricity. he runs one of those "you paint it, I fire it ceramics
shops so I doubt the kilns are ever full and there is really no rush.
The kilns are rated cone 10 but I don't think he ever goes that hot. I
might be missing something so I'll talk to him in the next few days. I
thought I could save him some money. Secondhand kilns are often kinda
beat up and his is fine.
Is he still planning to run the "wired for 208 kiln" on 240
What actual voltage was he inputting to the 240 volt kiln?
Sounds to me that he'll get lots of heat!
daniel peterman wrote:
That's the way I read it, too, Pete. He said "Some local fellow is trying
to replace his 240 volt ceramics kiln with essentially the same thing wired
for 208 volt"
What he can expect is faster heating, and higher overall temps, assuming he
cares to achieve them.
I own a heat treat furnace made by McEnglevan. My particular furnace was
marketed for 208 volts, three phase (Wye) wiring. I have three phase
delta (240 volts). A phone call to McEnglevan yielded the advice to rewire
the control circuit to address the different voltage (there's taps on the
transformer for various voltages)----and use the furnace. I was informed
that they use 240 volt coils in all their furnaces, so the 208 volt furnaces
heat somewhat slower.
The control circuit is the only really voltage sensitive item, you
might have to change connections on the pyrometer or contactor coil.
The heater is just coiled Nichrome wire in a slot and more than
likely dual rated for both voltages, it just gets a bit hotter on 240.
Rather than re-stringing the elements in the furnace (unless it is
due anyway...) install a Buck-Boost transformer (or three for 3-phase)
to drop the 240 to 208 or vice versa.
The Buck-Boost transformer only has to be rated for the percentage
of the voltage it's dropping or raising. If you are boosting 32 Volts
you can operate a 10 KVA 1Ph load with a roughly 1.5 KVA transformer.
--<< Bruce >>--
Furnaces are a simple resistance device, unless it has a 3-phase fan
motor all it takes is a rewire. And a roughly 33% larger power feed,
since you are going from three hot lines to two.
--<< Bruce >>--
First I would try it as is. It will not heat as fast, but may be good
enough. If it does not heat fast enough ( or Hot enough ), it can
easily have the elements replaced with 208 volt elements. But before
you do that, just shorten up the elements. Should work good, but maybe
not last a long time. But so what. Elements are a consumable and burn
out even if you start with heavier gauge wire.
New elements are likely to be cheaper than a buck/boost transformer.
Absolutely - but you have to consider how long the heater elements
are going to live to decide whether to Buck-Boost or restring.
If you are trying to do a Boost from 208 feed to 240 elements, do
nothing - it will take longer to warm up, but that will be solved the
first time you need to change the elements.
Shortening the elements sounds nice - but the ones I've seen have
the wire welded to the feed screw heads for a long lasting connection,
you stretch the element wire coil out to the length needed. It gets
too hot there to do a field bolted or lug connection, you will have
failures at the feed points.
Besides, the wire gets brittle after it's been cycled through normal
white-hot operating temperatures once or twice - try stretching the
element out longer to cut the end off, and it's going to snap at
If it's got Calrod elements that tend to live forever and cost more
to replace when they die, then the Buck/Boost may make more sense.
--<< Bruce >>--
Polytechforum.com is a website by engineers for engineers. It is not affiliated with any of manufacturers or vendors discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.