3D Printing - Big Struggle Featured

Dec 01, 2025 Last reply: 7 months ago 43 Replies

... I've done some fancier parts using FreeCAD, which gets criticized for having a steep learning curve, although there's excellent in-depth coverage of it in youtube videos if you have a few weeks to assimilate them. jiw

------------------------------------

I used PADS PCB for circuit board and machined enclosure design for many years and learned to tolerate its many quirks and annoyances. It could do everything but the command sequence differs among object types and it doesn't allow hopping sideways between menu tree branches, which at least helps avoid modifying an adjacent wrong selection, circuit boards are densely packed in 3 dimensions.

formatting link
"Unfortunately, I can't stop using this software: The company is committed to it, based on my recommendation (pounds head on desk 😝 ) , so I'll just have to live with it."

It originated at DEC and used the numbered function keys for commands, which was handy for the simpler DOS version but limiting when upgraded for Windows.

A particularly serious gotcha was that pin designation of diodes varies between libraries, as it's not obvious which should be 1 or 2, A and C are only aliases. I created my own library of all components I used, often with slightly extended pads for soldering rework or test point wires and tolerances matched to the fabricators' improving capabilities.

New users received and needed a two week training course at their headquarters, fortunately nearby. Electrical engineers using my workstation network for Viewlogic schematic capture stopped asking questions in half a day, with PADS they were still having trouble for a week.

Multilayer high speed circuit board design is tricky anyway and evidently not taught well enough in college, I had to learn it on my own with little help from above. I also learned ASIC and FPGA (customized IC logic) design and G code quickly without help.

How relatively difficult is FreeCAD?

<snip>

Don't have a 3D Printer... only know about what I've read🤷️

Hackaday has several pointers for this, mostly by using inserts:

formatting link
I've read that nuts can be embedded while printing too. Nut Traps?

Don't have a 3D Printer... only know about what I've read🤷️ Hackaday has several pointers for this, mostly by using inserts:

formatting link
've read that nuts can be embedded while printing too. Nut Traps? Leon Fisk Grand Rapids MI

----------------------------------- Thanks, I didn't know about that type of insert.

At Segway 'someone' inadvertently screwed a valuable injection molded prototype part together with permanent Loctite and I was tasked to salvage it. Such tasks are thankless to protect the guilty, typically a department head with little hands-on experience.

Molten solder on the screw heads softened the plastic around the brass inserts enough to ease out and unscrew them and epoxy in the hole secured them back in well enough that I heard nothing more.

I made a number of repairs with epoxy covered with clear tape or plastic film to make it hand moldable as it stiffened. Often in an electronics lab one has to make repairs with office supplies, like Wite-Out as solder mask and file folders to model sheet metal.

Generally they seem to be melted in. I've seen a hot iron tool used with the insert stuck on the end. I always wondered if the plastic flowed in enough to really bond them. A hot screw in insert, in my mind, might hold better.

I have used to other 3D CAD systems with some success. Fusion and ViaCAD. I found the strictly parametric modeling of Fusion slow and restrictive. Use that as a basis for evaluating if ther eis any vlaue in my opinion of FreeCAD.

From what I have "seen" it is very powerful, but I have failed to complete any work with it.* It has a steep learning curve couple with different standards and interface look/feel in different modules. I guess there are some "skins" that can reduce some of that or be selected so atleast part of it has a similar feel to some other CAD program you may already be familiar with. I never got to the point of seeing that. The steep learning curve is partly because there is a lot power there, partly because it was created by coders who may or may not have had design backgrounds, and partly because it is open source with lots of add-ons written be different people who wrote their own part to suit themselves.

*Well, I did use it to analyze some third party surface meshes, but I didn't actually succeed in repairing them.

FreeCAD may very well be the most cpable free CAD there is, but as has mentioned the learning curve is steep. It may very well be more capable than many commercial CAD programs.

I have a FreeCAD icon on my desktop, but I can't recall the last time I opened the program.

I have used to other 3D CAD systems with some success. Fusion and ViaCAD. I found the strictly parametric modeling of Fusion slow and restrictive.

-------------------------------------

formatting link
This is very similar to the way I create line drawings in PADS by assembling and moving models of features and subassemblies such as bolts and ball bearings and rolled steel sections. FreeCAD looks like a good winter project.

Preferably bentonite clay, and what you describe is called green sand. In the hobby realm atleast, it seems many small foundries are transitioning to petrobond where managing moisture content when not engaged in the hobby for some time is not an issue. Petrobond uses oil instead of water for the same/similar affect. To make it clump when rammed. I think Windy Hill Foundry (cast iron foundry business) also uses petropond as their default casting sand.

Sodium silicate. Its used in solution in place of just plain water. CO2 causes it to harden allowing for few or no inclusions, and more detailed molds made from more complex patterns. The CO2 in air is enough, but venting can help for faster mold prep, and for even faster casting C02 is sometimes flushed through the mold from a gas bottle. I first ran across it when I was researching how to recycle 6061 which is not a good casting alloy unmodified. That was when I first discovered the guys building the SV Seeker marine research vessel. They were casting custom porthole covers in sand molds using sodium silicate to make more rigid sand molds.

FYI: The addition of more silicon metal can improve the cast-ability of

6061. I think I read 6-7% additional silicon, but one fellow I chatted with claimed he got usable results with as little as 4% more silicon. I have a small gas foundry furnace on the shelf along side a couple bags of silicon metal, but I have not had the time to play with it. I also have a LOT of 6061 scrap. I've thrown away barrels of the stuff, but lately I've been cutting the tops out of old Roundup(tm) barrels purchased cheap and using them to store scrap. Its why I asked a while back about aftermarket barrel covers.

On 12/1/2025 12:58 PM, Bob La Londe wrote:

I've recently run into two things that may expand the scope of 3D printing in my mind. No real epiphany here, but maybe an expansion of scope.

One I already knew and mentioned. Undercuts. You can 3D print stuff with undercuts impractical or evne impossible to make by sutractive machining without complex setups, and changing relatively simple single structures into complex multiple part assembled structures. I'm talking about things beyond a non-uniform parting line. I had a customer recently send me a nice 3D .stp STEP file. One of the few that didn't translate broke or with artifacts. They had 3D printed a mold from it. There are many things wrong with plastic for mold making, but was injecting a soft cure media, and the undercuts did not prevent the part from being demolded. A machined aluminum mold would be superior for this media for many many reasons, but cutting it would be a lot of work requiring very very small cutters. I don't think I could tilt the plate enough to use those tiny cutters with their very short stick out enough to cut the features with crashing the tool holder into the part. I suggested some alternatives, but I have not heard back from them. That last part is no surprise. When I tell people the truth about what they want they often ghost me. I prefer that to those who imply I am a liar or competent, and they will just get somebody who knows what they are doing. In their case I don't think I would make their part by subtractive machining even on an articulating head 5+ axis machine. Maybe...

Parts where the raw material cost is. You need a bronze bushing. Bronze is expensive. You can usually buy a bronze bushing cheaper than the raw stock to machine one. If you are setup for it, and have been saving scrap you might be able to cast a bronze blank and then finish to spec, but generally the raw material is expensive. If a usable bushing is already available its probably cheaper. How about 3D printed bronze? You might make the argument that, "Sure, that's great if you can stock

10 grand worth of bronze powder,and you already have a quarter million dollar laser sintering 3D printer. The part is cheap, but the barrier to entry is quite high. No. There are filaments that can be printed (according to the manufacturer) on the same printers as PLA as easily as PLA. I can only assume they mean with a hardened steel or carbide nozzle. At this point I am falling back on sales propaganda, but it might have some potential. The thing is its not the price of PLA. A 1/2 kg spool of aluminum filament is over two hundred bucks. Amazingly a 1/2 KG spool of bronze filament is a little less (not much). Still its expensive, and to finish with a full metal part you have cook it in a furnace after printing to burn off the binder. It sounds like a compromise part, but maybe there is something there. I'm leaning towards probably not. If I already have a furnace (I do) I think it would still be faster and cheaper to cast a blank and machine to spec. There may be something there, but I am sure the nuance escapes me.

Well, I have a dozen(+) blanks to cut from wrought stock and a bunch of molds to cut. Another Sunday spent in the shop trying to catch up. Hopefully nobody falls, dies, or has a personal emergency today dragging me out of the shop yet again.

Parts where the raw material cost is. You need a bronze bushing. Bronze is expensive. You can usually buy a bronze bushing cheaper than the raw stock to machine one. If you are setup for it, and have been saving scrap you might be able to cast a bronze blank and then finish to spec, but generally the raw material is expensive. If a usable bushing is already available its probably cheaper. How about 3D printed bronze? You might make the argument that, "Sure, that's great if you can stock

10 grand worth of bronze powder,and you already have a quarter million dollar laser sintering 3D printer. The part is cheap, but the barrier to entry is quite high. No. There are filaments that can be printed (according to the manufacturer) on the same printers as PLA as easily as PLA. I can only assume they mean with a hardened steel or carbide nozzle. At this point I am falling back on sales propaganda, but it might have some potential. The thing is its not the price of PLA. A 1/2 kg spool of aluminum filament is over two hundred bucks. Amazingly a 1/2 KG spool of bronze filament is a little less (not much). Still its expensive, and to finish with a full metal part you have cook it in a furnace after printing to burn off the binder. It sounds like a compromise part, but maybe there is something there. I'm leaning towards probably not. If I already have a furnace (I do) I think it would still be faster and cheaper to cast a blank and machine to spec. There may be something there, but I am sure the nuance escapes me.

------------------------ Interesting but not yet useful for me.

formatting link
I watch what 3D has made to learn to think in its design terms, as I now think and design in terms of what my lathe and mill can (or can't) do. I was introduced to 3D printing of ABS at Segway 20 years ago and saw that it isn't strong enough for stressed parts of moving machinery, the sort of thing I may have to make or repair. I've seen some impressive recent 3D work at a Maker Space but not enough to tempt me to join.

So far 3D printing seems to me similar to the scenery and prop making of theatre, it can form artistic shapes mostly without function. I take it as incompletely substituting for expensive machine tools or the skill of a sculptor instead of replacing them.

I've been practicing hammering sheet metal into compound curves instead of pursuing 3D, to make things I need but can't buy. For example a replacement floor panel for my truck unnecessarily copies the no longer needed factory dip priming drain hole of the original, my patch continues a stiffening rib across that area instead.

This rule would be a severe restriction for me. I've cut pulley grooves for vee belts, steel cable and serpentine belts, all of which violate it.

formatting link

There are some commercial 3D machines out building structure parts. Read this awhile back, took me awhile to find it again...

formatting link

There are some commercial 3D machines out building structure parts. Read this awhile back, took me awhile to find it again...

formatting link
Fisk Grand Rapids MI

----------------------------------------

Thanks, that is very interesting. I don't have the mechanical engineering education to design beyond stock shapes of known properties. I just built what the Ph.Ds designed.

I've been considering hobby level 3D printing versus manual machining, not high end industrial equipment for which there was little to no need in testing or communications electronics. The machining I did at Segway was mainly to accommodate added electronics.

The parts being made were really interesting in shape. They look like something animal and plants would grow for structure rather than cast or machined.

I realize these 3D "printers" are out of reach for us peons to have about just now. I suspect the techniques and material will come down in price eventually.

There are some 3D Color printers now in our price range...

formatting link

I find most things machine faster out of better materials, but for "additive" manufacturing I would like to be able to turn my scrap into some form of usable raw stock again. Foundry work.

I found a use case for some supplemental black smithing. You can argue that blacksmithing is both additive and subtractive manufacturing. I made a set of wrenches a while back using normal 2.5D machining specific to some collet chuck tool holders I use everyday. I managed to partially mangle one end of one of the wrenches. Its 4140HT, and I figured it would be strong enough before it deformed. It would have been, but I let it slip. I had cut deep enough for a second wrench, so I just sliced a wrench off the stock. However, the old wrench could have been fixed a little faster by taking a step back in time. I set it out back on the bench near where I use the forge, and the next time I fireup the forge I'll deform it a little further, and just machine out the working surfaces that hold the tool holder. Then I can heat treat it like I should have the first time around. While I did already have a

2nd wrench 90% machined if I didn't it would certainly have been faster to reforge the mangled wrench than to make a new one from raw stock.

So far none of these thoughts have given me an epiphany about 3D printing, but thinking about them has started to change how I think about other processes.

Look at this cool looking thing I made. Yep. for the most part I agree, but there are companies selling 3D printed plastic parts.

There is one place 3D might be useful. To make one off hammer form or foam press form tools. I am sure you are familiar with the process of pressing a mold (die?) into heavy rubber foam to form sheet metal.

>

There are other forms of 3D printing where it might not be an issue. Filamant and resin to my meager knowledge level might not be suitable, but laser sintered metal powder might just do the trick. A truly capable machine would no doubt be beyond the budget of most of us here in this group, well except for our rich mining magnate from the UK (GRIN), but it can probably do that kind of work.

I'd have to ask my son about resin printing. I can think of some strategies where it might work.

There are some 3D Color printers now in our price range...

formatting link
Fisk Grand Rapids MI

-------------------------------------------- The inspiration for 3D printing was a molten plastic ink color printer that could pile up ink as Braille or offset printing plates.

formatting link
"In 1982, Robert Howard came up with the idea to produce a small color printing system that used piezos to spit drops of ink. He formed the company, R.H. (Robert Howard) Research (named Howtek, Inc. in Feb 1984), and developed the revolutionary technology that led to the Pixelmaster color printer with solid ink using Thermojet technology."

Many of the engineers had been at Centronics. I was their lab tech.

How does coloring the dots help with braille? ;^)

There is one place 3D might be useful. To make one off hammer form or foam press form tools. I am sure you are familiar with the process of pressing a mold (die?) into heavy rubber foam to form sheet metal.

-- Bob La Londe

---------------------------

Actually my process is medieval, hammer stretching the metal freehand into a deeper depression in end grain oak or flaring a hole into a trumpet horn shape on the anvil horn and edges. Once stretched spherical it can be reshaped oval or whatever, the hardest were a watertight rust patch for where an inner fender well transitions into the conical strut tower and a closely fitted costume armor helmet from a salad bowl that was cylindrical above and conical below.

A punch and die aren't necessary though I have a jewelry-sized dapping punch and block set and have made a hollow silver ball necklace ornament with one. I'd like to find or make a blacksmith swage block.

formatting link

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required